Balkinization: Scholars’ Brief in Shelby County v. Holder Urges Fidelity to Text and History of Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments

Scholars’ Brief in Shelby County v. Holder Urges Fidelity to Text and History of Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments

David Gans

While perhaps not as “unique” as the Westboro Baptist brief in Windsor described by Jason below, the brief Constitutional Accountability Center filed on behalf of scholars including Jack Balkin in Shelby County v. Holder, does present the Court with a uniquely comprehensive account of the Enforcement Clauses of the Reconstruction Amendments that I thought would be of interest to the readers of this blog. The brief, which is available here and is signed by Jack as well as Professors Guy-Uriel Charles, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, and Adam Winkler, analyzes the text and history of the Enforcement Clause of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to show that the original meaning of the express grant of power to “enforce” by “appropriate legislation” gave Congress broad discretion to enact legislation to protect the Reconstruction Amendments’ new constitutional guarantees of freedom, fundamental rights and equality, and voting rights. This is the first time in modern Supreme Court history – and perhaps ever – that the Court has been presented with the text and history of all three of the Reconstruction Amendments. The payoff is a clear and comprehensive showing how the American people fundamentally altered the Constitution and the balance of federal-state power to give Congress the power to ensure that fundamental rights, like the right to vote, were actually enjoyed, and to prevent and deter state-sponsored discrimination.

As the brief demonstrates, the Thirteen, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments fit together like an interlocking puzzle with pieces that both stand alone and build off each other. The Reconstruction Amendments and their nearly identically worded Enforcement Clauses reflect the lessons of the antebellum period and the Civil War and significantly change the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Against the back drop of Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Framers chose language – “appropriate legislation” – intended to give Congress broad discretion to select the means to “enforce” the Constitution’s new guarantees of personal, individual rights. The Framers of the Reconstruction Amendments chose this language – words taken directly from Chief Justice Marshall’s foundational opinion in McCulloch v. Maryland sustaining the broad federal powers of Congress under Article I – because they were reluctant to leave the judiciary with sole responsibility for protecting against racial discrimination in voting and other constitutional violations. As the brief reflects, the scholarly work of the nation’s leading constitutional scholars on both the left and right – including Jack Balkin, Steven Calabresi, and Michael McConnell – demonstrate that the text, history, and original meaning of the Reconstruction Amendment give Congress broad power to enact prophylactic regulation to protect the constitutional rights guaranteed by the Reconstruction Amendments.

The history of the three Amendments fit tightly together. Indeed, each subsequent Amendment built off the experience of Congress in trying to enforce the Constitution in the face of continuing discrimination by recalcitrant southern states. The Thirteenth Amendment, for the first time in the Constitution’s history, gave Congress the express power to enforce the Constitution’s promise of freedom. Debates over Congress’ first attempt to enact landmark civil rights legislation to enforce the Thirteenth Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, led to the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, which armed Congress with new powers to protect fundamental rights and equality under the law for all persons. Culminating this historical progression, the Fifteenth Amendment’s plain language and history demonstrates that Congress, not the courts and certainly not the states, was being given sweeping powers to stamp out every conceivable attempt by the states to deny the franchise on account of race. Given this history, the Fifteenth Amendment’s focused mandate, and the overwhelming evidence of the intended role of Congress, the Supreme Court’s deference to Congress should be at its apex in reviewing legislation designed to prevent and deter racial discrimination in voting prohibited by the Fifteenth Amendment.

The central question in Shelby County is whether the Court’s conservative Justices will follow this text and history or try to subvert it. Shelby County argues that the preclearance requirement of the Voting Rights Act and its associated coverage are outdated and necessary, and hence unconstitutional, but Congress, using the express powers specifically granted in the Constitution, disagreed. By an overwhelming margin – 98-0 in the Senate and 390-33 in the House – bipartisan majorities agreed that the preclearance provision of the historic Voting Rights Act continued to serve the critical purpose of preventing and deterring racial discrimination in voting that persist in the covered jurisdictions. As the comprehensive opinions below demonstrate, Congress had ample basis for maintaining Section 5 as a bulwark against current and ongoing state-sponsored racial discrimination in voting concentrated in the covered jurisdictions. Pursuant to the original understanding of the Fifteenth Amendment’s Enforcement Clause – that Congress would have broad power to determine what is appropriate to protect the right to vote free from racial discrimination – the Court should defer to Congress’s near-unanimous judgment.

David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center and a co-author of CAC's brief in Shelby County. This post is being cross-posted at Text and History.

Posted 2:34 PM by David Gans [link]

Comments:

The biggest concern here is that the USSC will hold that the specific use of the powers used here is not properly congruent and proportional to current needs. The general idea that Congress can address subject matter seems to me to be a major aspect of the brief, but that isn't really the biggest concern, is it?

It is that the baseline used is outdated and that more up to date and general (thus some concern that equality of the states is being violated) methods, including to address non-covered jurisdictions, should be used.

I'm all for broad discretion to Congress but this is the biggest concern. Is the brief and this discussion properly focused on it?

# posted by

Joe : 3:45 PM

This comment has been removed by the author.

# posted by

Mr. Whiskas : 5:01 PM

If the Amendment was intended to invest in Congress a broad power to enforce as Congress saw appropriate then the questions of congruency and such should be left to that body, no?

I think the Court should apply something like rational basis here.

# posted by

Mr. Whiskas : 5:03 PM

This comment has been removed by the author.

# posted by

Joe : 6:30 PM

Depends on how "broad" you want "broad" to mean. Pursuant to rulings like Boerne v. Flores & NAMUNDO v. Holder, the USSC has not just left the matters to Congress.

The USSC very well might be wrong, but don't think they are going to change their minds. So, my concern would be not some general history lesson, but more emphasis on why this specific law is good enough.

The PPACA also should have been upheld under the CC pursuant a rational basis test. We saw how appeals to McCulloch and the like got us there. But, I guess what should be the case can be part of the amici mix too.

# posted by

Joe : 6:32 PM

Might Justice Thomas be the potential "swing" vote?

# posted by

Shag from Brookline : 8:44 PM

Wondering if this brief might allow the reconciliation of Section 5 with City of Boerne, I reread for the first time in a while City v. Boerne. Justice Kennedy makes two points in Section III-A of the opinion: that enforcing rights protected by the Constitution is different from defining those rights; and that "congruence and proportionality" between means and ends is a hallmark of enforcement.

It is interesting that the debate among the justices was focused on the definition of the right to freedom of religion, in particular, the validity of Employment Division v. Smith. If Smith had been wrongly decided, then there would be no conflict between RFRA and the First Amendment. "Congruence and proportionality" slipped in through the side door. However, I think it is clear that Justice Kennedy has always wanted it to be a limiting principle for federal power, and that the contemporary Court so sees it.

In City of Boerne, Justice Kennedy examines the "legislative record" for RFRA and finds it wanting in comparison with the Voting Rights Act. It is clear from NAMUNDO that the Court no longer respects that legislative record. Unless Justice Scalia decides that the legislative record is just legislative history writ large (he did not join Section III-A-1 of Kennedy's opinion, dealing with the legislative history of the Fourteenth Amendment, but did join Section III-B, analyzing the legislative record), there is only weak support for the preclearance remedy.

However, if the scope of the Fifteenth Amendment right to vote is sufficiently ample, it can support even such strong remedies as pre-clearance. That is, is the right to vote protected from violation by a shell of derivative rights, such as a right against non-retrogression in redistricting, a right against arbitrary changes in registration and voting procedures, a right against suppression of turnout by location and quantity of polling places, etc.

This issue is liable to be highlighted with the example of photo ID requirements. The Court has held these do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment in Crawford v. Marion County. (Interestingly, Scalia's opinion, joined by Thomas and Alito, sounds a lot like Employment Division v. Smith.) But the Justice Department refused to preclear Texas' photo ID requirement (which was later found to be regressive of voting rights by a three-judge court, which pretermitted the purposeful discrimination question that Scalia had found determinative). Particularly to state sovereignty adherents like Scalia and Kennedy, this differing treatment of states is abhorrent.

It seems that Justice Kennedy, like the amicus brief, interprets the Civil War Amendments in pari materia. Unfortunately, he interprets them as bearing much less power than the brief. The brief is a nice try, but I don't think it will save Section 5.

# posted by

r.friedman : 12:42 PM

The Crawford plurality held that the specific law in place did not violate the Constitution in the midst of a facial challenge. This doesn't mean ALL id laws, no matter their harshness, are acceptable.

Also, Crawford noted the record didn't provide enough proof of harm. The Administration has offered such proof (we can carp on the merits) as have other challengers.

This seems to be a fact specific issue.

# posted by

Joe : 12:12 PM

This is a powerfully, tightly argued brief, making its case by means of text, history and decisions of the Court, including decisions on the Voting Rights Act. The brief addresses well Boerne's refinement of McCulloch. It may be difficult for textualists/originalists on the Court to ignore the arguments in this brief. [Note: Is there available a textualist/originalism brief or article challenging this brief on text/originalism grounds?]

Justice Thomas, as I speculated in any earlier comment, just might be a swing vote. Thomas' life has experienced the efforts of states with Jim Crow laws impacting the rights of African-Americans under the 15th Amendment. While Thomas has yet to demonstrate on the Court what Justice Thurgood Marshall brought to the Court with his experiences as an African American and as a lawyer helping pave the way for Thomas to be appointed to the Court via educational benefits springing from Brown v. Bd. of Educ. and the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s), at some point Thomas has to be concerned with how history will treat his time and role on the Court. This case may be a future Dred Scott if the Court limits Section 2 of the 15th Amendment and decimates the Voting Rights Act. From the standpoint of originalism, much more information is available on how the Reconstruction Amendments came into being.

There is repetition in this brief that makes it even more effective. Its arguments are supported in great detail, sort of like belt, suspenders and jockstrap.

For those who cannot, will not take the time to read the entire brief, take a peek at the paragraph beginning at the bottom of page 27 and continuing on page 28 for a taste.

# posted by

Shag from Brookline : 10:49 AM

The brief is not available at the link provided. A search of available amicus briefs has me coming up empty handed. Can anyone help me out with this? I'd love to review it.

# posted by

Dean : 11:29 AM

Never mind. Found it here: http://www.naacpldf.org/document/brief-constitutional-accountability-center-and-constitutional-law-scholars

But indeed, the original link in the blog post does not link to the brief.

# posted by

Dean : 11:32 AM

Doug Kendall's recent post at this Blog "The Deafening Silence of Conservative Stars on the Constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act" does not provide for comments, although comments can be made at his post at Text and History.

In my earlier comment I included this question:

"[Note: Is there available a textualist/originalism brief or article challenging this brief on text/originalism grounds?]"

Doug's post seems to answer "No." But "Why"?

Perhaps it is Brown v. Bd. of Educ. that no one seems prepared to directly challenge. Brown was unanimous, with one opinion. Over time, alas too much time, Brown has been accepted. Some originalists have opined that originalism supports Brown. But it took a long time, too long, for the acceptance of Brown. Brown has become foundational in ConLaw. Brown, as noted, is no longer subject to direct challenge.

The textualism/originalism case for the Voting Rights Act is much, much stronger than it was for Brown. Perhaps this accounts for the deafening silence Doug refers to.

It is of course possible that SCOTUS may determine that cert should not have been granted and get rid of the case. If not, what might be the impact of a majority upholding Shelby County? What might be the impact on textualism/originalism? If SCOTUS sustains the lower court decision, thus upholding the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act, what if it is not unanimous with one or more dissents, or even if unanimous with one or more concurring opinions, what might be the impact? Might Shelby County v. Holder be considered a latter day Dred Scott? Might CJ Roberts display the skills of CJ Warren in Brown?

When Brown came down in 1954, I was finishing up law school at the age of 23. I recall well what happened as Brown was challenged on the ground and in Congress, even after the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s. I recall well Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy in the 1968 presidential campaign, remnants of which continue to this day. I recall well the treatment of Pres. Obama by conservatives from day one and continuing even with his reelection. This is a time for CJ Roberts to lead. Enough!

# posted by

Shag from Brookline : 8:21 AM

I neglected to include in the closing paragraph of my preceding comment this:

"I wonder how old the conservatives named by Doug in his post were in 1954 when Brown came down?"

# posted by

Shag from Brookline : 9:03 AM

Sam Tanenhaus' The New Republic essay (Feb. 10, 2013) "Original Sin - Why the GOP is and will continue to be the party of white people" includes some of what I recall from the days post-Brown v. Bd. of Educ. that I referenced in my earlier comment on Doug Kendall's recent related post at this Blog. I learned of this essay from Paul Krugman's NYTimes blog entry yesterday that provides a link and a comment about his view of the GOP in his "Conscience of a Liberal.".

Finley Peter Dunne's Mr. Dooley many generations ago sometimes commented on the Supreme Court following the election returns. Perhaps its conservative members also read "tea leaves." Tanenhaus makes no reference to the Shelby County appeal but read between the lines.

# posted by

Shag from Brookline : 3:19 PM

Why is the number of senators and representatives who supported the extension of the VRA of any significance in the debate? If Congress passes a law by the barest minimum in each chamber it is just as valid a law, yet this blog and several of the amici seem to feel that the size of the majorities should somehow make a difference in the legal argument.

# posted by

Loyal Opposition : 4:20 PM

Loyal Opposition apparently has more confidence in the unelected 5-4 judiciary than the elected, representative, branches. Why, especially when the elected branches do so overwhelmingly over time, including recently? Perhaps Loyal Opposition is suffering from Lindsey Graham-itis.

# posted by

Shag from Brookline : 8:57 PM

Thank you for the great article I did enjoyed reading it, I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back from again. I want to encourage that you continue your great job, have a good day.
e cigarette liquid

# posted by

Nga Phùng : 9:57 PM

Thanks for sharing excellent informations. Your website is very cool. I’m impressed by the details that you’ve on this web site. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for more articles. click here to view std testing at home

# posted by

hamletpro : 10:34 PM

toronto landscape designers, This is totally awesome! You have a great mind. This is interesting content I can respect and appreciate. It’s obvious you’re knowledgeable in this area.

# posted by

afyjea : 12:56 AM

Excellent! It is a successful article. The information is very useful. Thank so much!
collin county attorneys

# posted by

yeaonh : 9:36 PM

This post is so well written and it's easy to see you know what you're talking about.
click here to view std testing at home

# posted by

Khac Cuong : 7:18 AM

lawn care companies toronto, I really do enjoy this great website and your article was just wonderful. This is the ultimate blog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. Thanks for sharing all these valuable inform.

# posted by

Puafoz : 11:18 AM

grounds maintenance, Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

# posted by

Puafoz : 11:19 AM

permaculture course, I really do enjoy this great website and your article was just wonderful. This is the ultimate blog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. Thanks for sharing all these valuable inform.

# posted by

Puafoz : 11:08 PM

permaculture course, Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

# posted by

Puafoz : 11:08 PM

buy capsiplex, Thank You for creating quite a wonderful article I very much enjoyed browsing it.

# posted by

bghygu : 9:30 PM

buy capsiplex, These are all really great points made here. I hope many people gain access to this information. This is good quality writing deserving of attention.

# posted by

bghygu : 9:30 PM

fort worth doctor, There a good way to build up support and have seem to be working, I think it's a great idea.

# posted by

Vixuj : 1:53 AM

fort worth emergency room, Great post, good work. It couldn't be wrote any better. Reading this post reminds me of my recent employer ! He constantly kept talking about this.

# posted by

Vixuj : 1:55 AM

e juice
I really do enjoy this great website and your article was just wonderful. This is the ultimate blog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. Thanks for sharing all these valuable inform.

# posted by

jngfksdgmf : 5:27 AM

e juice
Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

# posted by

jngfksdgmf : 5:27 AM

landscaping companies, It isn’t often I take note of a writer, but you have done a bang up job here. I feel the same as you about this topic. Thanks for sharing.

# posted by

dacahi : 4:44 AM

Thanks for ones marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you might be a great author.I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back sometime soon. I want to encourage that you continue your great work, have a nice morning!
slim light boxes

# posted by

quynh hao : 9:56 PM

Excellent! It is a successful article. The information is very useful. Thank so much!
Phoenix University

# posted by

yen le : 11:09 PM

toronto landscapers, Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

# posted by

afyjea : 9:42 PM

markham landscaping, An attention-grabbing discussion is worth comment. I think that it’s best to write more on this topic, it may not be a taboo subject but generally persons are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

# posted by

afyjea : 9:44 PM

light box signage
It takes a special person to write a great quality article and you are such a person. The points you make in this writing are well thought out and written.

# posted by

quynh hao : 10:20 PM

burleson silver sneakers, Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

# posted by

Cixui : 12:50 AM

burleson yoga, An attention-grabbing discussion is worth comment. I think that it’s best to write more on this topic, it may not be a taboo subject but generally persons are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

# posted by

Cixui : 12:51 AM

buy capsiplex, Can I just say what a relief to find someone who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people need to read this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

# posted by

Cixui : 8:58 PM

buy capsiplex, Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

# posted by

Cixui : 8:59 PM

lawn sprinklers toronto, It isn’t often I take note of a writer, but you have done a bang up job here. I feel the same as you about this topic. Thanks for sharing.

# posted by

julia : 9:31 PM

reception office signs
I feel the need to thank you for sharing your vast knowledge. It isn’t often I get to tell a writer “good job!”. Thanks for all the great informative content.

# posted by

quynh hao : 9:25 PM

tattoo supply
However, if the scope of the Fifteenth Amendment right to vote is sufficiently ample, it can support even such strong remedies as pre-clearance. That is, is the right to vote protected from violation by a shell of derivative rights, such as a right against non-retrogression in redistricting, a right against arbitrary changes in registration and voting procedures, a right against suppression of turnout by location and quantity of polling places, etc.

# posted by

wiiliamliat : 3:02 AM

grounds maintenance, Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

# posted by

convert09 : 10:00 PM

copper signs
I really do enjoy this great website and your article was just wonderful. This is the ultimate blog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. Thanks for sharing all these valuable inform.

# posted by

quynh hao : 10:08 PM

tarrant county hospital, Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

# posted by

bgjing : 9:50 AM

I have an interest in this topic and enjoyed reading your view on it. bourges

# posted by

Juliana : 5:38 AM

THANK you so much this is just the information that I needed. fireplace mantels

# posted by

Hoai Pham : 12:32 AM

stainless steel signage
I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept. Thank you for the post.

# posted by

quynh hao : 10:46 PM

What you say is true and I completely agree with your point of view. flash

# posted by

Hoai Pham : 5:37 AM

Your have great insight about the subject of your post. click here to view addison criminal lawyer

# posted by

Hoai Pham : 11:41 PM

You said exactly what I was thinking in this post and I wanted to say thanks. 3some

# posted by

phuong nga : 10:54 PM

business signs
Straight to the point and well written! Why can’t everyone else be like this?

# posted by

quynh hao : 11:19 PM

Your posts are so informative that I always come back for more. grab mckinney criminal lawyer

# posted by

schmidt Ralph : 6:13 AM

The information on this blog is always stimulating to read. canoe

# posted by

Juliana : 11:41 PM

Your article was great. I like your style.
plano texas attorney

# posted by

nothater : 2:54 AM

The information on this blog is always stimulating to read. window cleaning san diego

# posted by

Juliana : 8:05 AM

This subject interests me greatly and I think what you said is right on. twit quiz

# posted by

Juliana : 11:10 PM

I love reading posts with such a fresh point of view on this interesting topic. metropol

# posted by

rophi89 : 12:55 AM

home improvement contractors
That is, is the right to vote protected from violation by a shell of derivative rights, such as a right against non-retrogression in redistricting, a right against arbitrary changes in registration and voting procedures, a right against suppression of turnout by location and quantity of polling places, etc

# posted by

selingzat : 5:35 AM

business signs
Very nice post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wished to mention that I have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I am hoping you write again very soon!

# posted by

quynh hao : 10:21 PM

I visited your site & after visiting i found that it is very informational for everyone you have done really a great job thank you timo

# posted by

Nguyen Van : 6:57 AM

Search Engine Marketing Brisbane
That is, is the right to vote protected from violation by a shell of derivative rights, such as a right against non-retrogression in redistricting, a right against arbitrary changes in registration and voting procedures, a right against suppression of turnout by location and quantity of polling places, etc.

# posted by

sakuramin : 11:34 AM

sleep study dallas
Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept. Thank you for the post.

# posted by

nayounine : 10:28 PM

I have an interest in this topic and enjoyed reading your view on it.canoe

# posted by

Nguyen Van : 11:21 PM

Your blog has such good information that always makes me think. austin home loans

# posted by

Khac Cuong : 5:42 AM

Your blog is very informative on the subject that interests me. twit quiz

# posted by

kenvinpipi : 3:14 AM

office signage
Your blog is definitely worth a read if anyone finds it. I'm lucky I did because now I've got a whole new view of this

# posted by

quynh hao : 3:45 AM

http://www.andy1stbirmingham.co.uk/
Thanks for the good post on your blog, it really gives me an insight on this subject.

# posted by

lung thung : 4:37 AM

http://www.potential-uk.co.uk/leicester.html
Subscribed to your blog, thanks

# posted by

lung thung : 4:38 AM

This subject is very stimulating and I thank you for this great post. austin credit union

# posted by

kenvinpipi : 11:27 PM

building signage
Thanks for creating a great page I thoroughly liked reading through it.

# posted by

lung thung : 4:20 AM

Thanks for that great post and I appreciate the great blog you have. austin credit unions

# posted by

kenvinpipi : 5:24 AM

business signs
I think this is one of the most vital information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The web site style is ideal, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers

# posted by

lung thung : 11:54 PM

http://www.potential-uk.co.uk/leicester.html
Thanks for ones marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you might be a great author.I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back sometime soon. I want to encourage that you continue your great work, have a nice morning!

# posted by

lung thung : 12:15 AM

open pan letters
Great post, I hope you don’t thoughts if I exploit this post as a part of my guide report?

# posted by

yeu tinh : 10:57 PM

Your blog has such good information that always makes me think.
University of Phoenix

# posted by

yen le : 10:24 PM

This help me to widen my knowledge about what is your theme is. Thanks a lot for this information!
promotional displays

# posted by

yeu tinh : 11:38 PM

Your post made me look at the subject from a completely different angle.
austin texas bank

# posted by

kenvinpipi : 11:27 PM

Your blog has such good information that always makes me thinkDivorce Attorney Las Vegas

# posted by

Mai Truc : 11:12 PM

SEO Consultants Brisbane
The general idea that Congress can address subject matter seems to me to be a major aspect of the brief, but that isn't really the biggest concern, is it?

# posted by

saclymaicon : 10:11 AM

Thank you for this post because it gave me so much great information. window washing san diego

# posted by

kenvin hugo : 9:51 PM

residential remodeling
The general idea that Congress can address subject matter seems to me to be a major aspect of the brief, but that isn't really the biggest concern, is it?

# posted by

Hoom1974 : 3:27 AM

You have a knack for writing thought provoking posts and I thank you. window washing san diego

# posted by

kenvinpipi : 12:20 AM

Your blog is always informative and this post is no exception. Sparco Hand Brake Handles

# posted by

hamkingter : 3:46 AM

Nice blog it rocks the way that you write makes me think differently.
Arts

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 5:30 AM

Thank you for writing this blog this was what I was looking for.
social marketing

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 5:39 AM

Really I'm impressed out of this post…The one that created this post can be a genius and learns how to keep your readers connected..Thank you for sharing this with us. I uncovered it informative and interesting. Excited for much more updates.plano law firm

# posted by

kevilcuongpro : 6:01 AM

Google, Face book and any other company would be G L A D to sell your information to everyone under the sun if they were allowed to.
london caterers

# posted by

kenvinbruno : 12:13 AM

These kinds of articles are always attractive and I am happy to find so many good points here in the post. I appreciate it very much! I am looking forward to other share. Thank you so much! trending news

# posted by

kenvinpipi : 6:23 AM

I never thought about looking at the topic in this way and I thank you for that.
Seo cardiff

# posted by

marya leona : 11:49 PM

Unfortunately I would not agree with anything written in this blog, sorry.
Seo cardiff

# posted by

marya leona : 11:53 PM

texas ppc
A search of available amicus briefs has me coming up empty handed. Can anyone help me out with this? I'd love to review it.

# posted by

pham marien : 9:39 PM

Thank you for the thoughtful article. Difficult and important topic.bodybuilding

# posted by

hienhseos : 5:06 AM

Hope this answers your question, I am kind of new on the forums and still trying to gain knowledge.yoga

# posted by

papa mama : 5:54 AM

I am glad to see your article. I like it so much. And I think everyone does.
collin county attorney

# posted by

histrely : 11:33 PM

Your astute observations have given me much to think about.
Nevada power of attorney

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 5:55 AM

Your astute observations have given me much to think about.
http://www.gmdlegal.com/powers-of-attorney/

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 5:55 AM

Interesting point of view and I agree with most of what you say.
Las Vegas kitchen remodeling

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 6:09 AM

Thank you for a well written post, it really made me think.
Las Vegas general contractors

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 6:17 AM

Your have great insight about the subject of your post.
solar iphone charger

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 4:31 AM

Your take on the topic is certainly interesting and well done.
solar iphone charger

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 4:33 AM

While I can't agree with all your points I did enjoy reading your post.
solar iphone charger

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 4:34 AM

Your blog is so interesting and full of great information that I always come back.
adsl fpt binh duong

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 10:54 PM

Your post made me look at the subject from a completely different angle.
adsl fpt binh duong

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 10:55 PM

i am sure you spend a lot of time on doing this site! I'm really here to appreciate that you are a good blogger!!! singapore magento

# posted by

hienhseos : 11:58 PM

I believe in what you have written here but I think a little more research could have been needed.
katy tx painter

# posted by

laura anmi : 11:41 PM

I agree with a few of the points here but the others I do not agree with as much.
katy painter

# posted by

laura anmi : 11:43 PM

Thanks for that great post and I appreciate the great blog you have.
lap mang fpt binh duong

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 3:39 AM

The information you provide on this blog is awesome.
adsl fpt binh duong

# posted by

hanh nguyen : 3:40 AM