Balkinization  

Monday, February 04, 2013

Scholars’ Brief in Shelby County v. Holder Urges Fidelity to Text and History of Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments

David Gans



While perhaps not as “unique” as the Westboro Baptist brief in Windsor described by Jason below, the brief Constitutional Accountability Center filed on behalf of scholars including Jack Balkin in Shelby County v. Holder, does present the Court with a uniquely comprehensive account of the Enforcement Clauses of the Reconstruction Amendments that I thought would be of interest to the readers of this blog.  The brief, which is available here and is signed by Jack as well as Professors Guy-Uriel Charles, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, and Adam Winkler, analyzes the text and history of the Enforcement Clause of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to show that the original meaning of the express grant of power to “enforce” by “appropriate legislation” gave Congress broad discretion to enact legislation to protect the Reconstruction Amendments’ new constitutional guarantees of freedom, fundamental rights and equality, and voting rights.  This is the first time in modern Supreme Court history – and perhaps ever – that the Court has been presented with the text and history of all three of the Reconstruction Amendments.  The payoff is a clear and comprehensive showing how the American people fundamentally altered the Constitution and the balance of federal-state power to give Congress the power to ensure that fundamental rights, like the right to vote, were actually enjoyed, and to prevent and deter state-sponsored discrimination.

As the brief demonstrates, the Thirteen, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments fit together like an interlocking puzzle with pieces that both stand alone and build off each other.   The Reconstruction Amendments and their nearly identically worded Enforcement Clauses reflect the lessons of the antebellum period and the Civil War and significantly change the balance of power between the federal government and the states.   Against the back drop of Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Framers chose language  – “appropriate legislation” – intended to give Congress broad discretion to select the means to “enforce” the Constitution’s new guarantees of personal, individual rights.    The Framers of the Reconstruction Amendments chose this language – words taken directly from Chief Justice Marshall’s foundational opinion in McCulloch v. Maryland sustaining the broad federal powers of Congress under Article I – because they were reluctant to leave the judiciary with sole responsibility for protecting against racial discrimination in voting and other constitutional violations.  As the brief reflects, the scholarly work of the nation’s leading constitutional scholars on both the left and right – including Jack Balkin, Steven Calabresi, and Michael McConnell – demonstrate that the text, history, and original meaning of the Reconstruction Amendment give Congress broad power to enact prophylactic regulation to protect the constitutional rights guaranteed by the Reconstruction Amendments.     

The history of the three Amendments fit tightly together.  Indeed, each subsequent Amendment built off the experience of Congress in trying to enforce the Constitution in the face of continuing discrimination by recalcitrant southern states.  The Thirteenth Amendment, for the first time in the Constitution’s history, gave Congress the express power to enforce the Constitution’s promise of freedom.  Debates over Congress’ first attempt to enact landmark civil rights legislation to enforce the Thirteenth Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, led to the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, which armed Congress with new powers to protect fundamental rights and equality under the law for all persons.  Culminating this historical progression, the Fifteenth Amendment’s plain language and history demonstrates that Congress, not the courts and certainly not the states, was being given sweeping powers to stamp out every conceivable attempt by the states to deny the franchise on account of race.  Given this history, the Fifteenth Amendment’s focused mandate, and the overwhelming evidence of the intended role of Congress, the Supreme Court’s deference to Congress should be at its apex in reviewing legislation designed to prevent and deter racial discrimination in voting prohibited by the Fifteenth Amendment.  

The central question in Shelby County is whether the Court’s conservative Justices will follow this text and history or try to subvert it.   Shelby County argues that the preclearance requirement of the Voting Rights Act and its associated coverage are outdated and necessary, and hence unconstitutional, but Congress, using the express powers specifically granted in the Constitution, disagreed.  By an overwhelming margin – 98-0 in the Senate and 390-33 in the House – bipartisan majorities agreed that the preclearance provision of the historic Voting Rights Act continued to serve the critical purpose of preventing and deterring racial discrimination in voting that persist in the covered jurisdictions.  As the comprehensive opinions below demonstrate, Congress had ample basis for maintaining Section 5 as a bulwark against current and ongoing state-sponsored racial discrimination in voting concentrated in the covered jurisdictions.   Pursuant to the original understanding of the Fifteenth Amendment’s Enforcement Clause – that Congress would have broad power to determine what is appropriate to protect the right to vote free from racial discrimination – the Court should defer to Congress’s near-unanimous judgment.      

David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center and a co-author of CAC's brief in Shelby County.  This post is being cross-posted at Text and History.


Comments:

The biggest concern here is that the USSC will hold that the specific use of the powers used here is not properly congruent and proportional to current needs. The general idea that Congress can address subject matter seems to me to be a major aspect of the brief, but that isn't really the biggest concern, is it?

It is that the baseline used is outdated and that more up to date and general (thus some concern that equality of the states is being violated) methods, including to address non-covered jurisdictions, should be used.

I'm all for broad discretion to Congress but this is the biggest concern. Is the brief and this discussion properly focused on it?
 

This comment has been removed by the author.
 

If the Amendment was intended to invest in Congress a broad power to enforce as Congress saw appropriate then the questions of congruency and such should be left to that body, no?

I think the Court should apply something like rational basis here.
 

This comment has been removed by the author.
 

Depends on how "broad" you want "broad" to mean. Pursuant to rulings like Boerne v. Flores & NAMUNDO v. Holder, the USSC has not just left the matters to Congress.

The USSC very well might be wrong, but don't think they are going to change their minds. So, my concern would be not some general history lesson, but more emphasis on why this specific law is good enough.

The PPACA also should have been upheld under the CC pursuant a rational basis test. We saw how appeals to McCulloch and the like got us there. But, I guess what should be the case can be part of the amici mix too.
 

Might Justice Thomas be the potential "swing" vote?
 

Wondering if this brief might allow the reconciliation of Section 5 with City of Boerne, I reread for the first time in a while City v. Boerne. Justice Kennedy makes two points in Section III-A of the opinion: that enforcing rights protected by the Constitution is different from defining those rights; and that "congruence and proportionality" between means and ends is a hallmark of enforcement.

It is interesting that the debate among the justices was focused on the definition of the right to freedom of religion, in particular, the validity of Employment Division v. Smith. If Smith had been wrongly decided, then there would be no conflict between RFRA and the First Amendment. "Congruence and proportionality" slipped in through the side door. However, I think it is clear that Justice Kennedy has always wanted it to be a limiting principle for federal power, and that the contemporary Court so sees it.

In City of Boerne, Justice Kennedy examines the "legislative record" for RFRA and finds it wanting in comparison with the Voting Rights Act. It is clear from NAMUNDO that the Court no longer respects that legislative record. Unless Justice Scalia decides that the legislative record is just legislative history writ large (he did not join Section III-A-1 of Kennedy's opinion, dealing with the legislative history of the Fourteenth Amendment, but did join Section III-B, analyzing the legislative record), there is only weak support for the preclearance remedy.

However, if the scope of the Fifteenth Amendment right to vote is sufficiently ample, it can support even such strong remedies as pre-clearance. That is, is the right to vote protected from violation by a shell of derivative rights, such as a right against non-retrogression in redistricting, a right against arbitrary changes in registration and voting procedures, a right against suppression of turnout by location and quantity of polling places, etc.

This issue is liable to be highlighted with the example of photo ID requirements. The Court has held these do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment in Crawford v. Marion County. (Interestingly, Scalia's opinion, joined by Thomas and Alito, sounds a lot like Employment Division v. Smith.) But the Justice Department refused to preclear Texas' photo ID requirement (which was later found to be regressive of voting rights by a three-judge court, which pretermitted the purposeful discrimination question that Scalia had found determinative). Particularly to state sovereignty adherents like Scalia and Kennedy, this differing treatment of states is abhorrent.

It seems that Justice Kennedy, like the amicus brief, interprets the Civil War Amendments in pari materia. Unfortunately, he interprets them as bearing much less power than the brief. The brief is a nice try, but I don't think it will save Section 5.
 

The Crawford plurality held that the specific law in place did not violate the Constitution in the midst of a facial challenge. This doesn't mean ALL id laws, no matter their harshness, are acceptable.

Also, Crawford noted the record didn't provide enough proof of harm. The Administration has offered such proof (we can carp on the merits) as have other challengers.

This seems to be a fact specific issue.
 

This is a powerfully, tightly argued brief, making its case by means of text, history and decisions of the Court, including decisions on the Voting Rights Act. The brief addresses well Boerne's refinement of McCulloch. It may be difficult for textualists/originalists on the Court to ignore the arguments in this brief. [Note: Is there available a textualist/originalism brief or article challenging this brief on text/originalism grounds?]

Justice Thomas, as I speculated in any earlier comment, just might be a swing vote. Thomas' life has experienced the efforts of states with Jim Crow laws impacting the rights of African-Americans under the 15th Amendment. While Thomas has yet to demonstrate on the Court what Justice Thurgood Marshall brought to the Court with his experiences as an African American and as a lawyer helping pave the way for Thomas to be appointed to the Court via educational benefits springing from Brown v. Bd. of Educ. and the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s), at some point Thomas has to be concerned with how history will treat his time and role on the Court. This case may be a future Dred Scott if the Court limits Section 2 of the 15th Amendment and decimates the Voting Rights Act. From the standpoint of originalism, much more information is available on how the Reconstruction Amendments came into being.

There is repetition in this brief that makes it even more effective. Its arguments are supported in great detail, sort of like belt, suspenders and jockstrap.

For those who cannot, will not take the time to read the entire brief, take a peek at the paragraph beginning at the bottom of page 27 and continuing on page 28 for a taste.


 

The brief is not available at the link provided. A search of available amicus briefs has me coming up empty handed. Can anyone help me out with this? I'd love to review it.
 

Never mind. Found it here: http://www.naacpldf.org/document/brief-constitutional-accountability-center-and-constitutional-law-scholars

But indeed, the original link in the blog post does not link to the brief.
 

Doug Kendall's recent post at this Blog "The Deafening Silence of Conservative Stars on the Constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act" does not provide for comments, although comments can be made at his post at Text and History.

In my earlier comment I included this question:

"[Note: Is there available a textualist/originalism brief or article challenging this brief on text/originalism grounds?]"

Doug's post seems to answer "No." But "Why"?

Perhaps it is Brown v. Bd. of Educ. that no one seems prepared to directly challenge. Brown was unanimous, with one opinion. Over time, alas too much time, Brown has been accepted. Some originalists have opined that originalism supports Brown. But it took a long time, too long, for the acceptance of Brown. Brown has become foundational in ConLaw. Brown, as noted, is no longer subject to direct challenge.

The textualism/originalism case for the Voting Rights Act is much, much stronger than it was for Brown. Perhaps this accounts for the deafening silence Doug refers to.

It is of course possible that SCOTUS may determine that cert should not have been granted and get rid of the case. If not, what might be the impact of a majority upholding Shelby County? What might be the impact on textualism/originalism? If SCOTUS sustains the lower court decision, thus upholding the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act, what if it is not unanimous with one or more dissents, or even if unanimous with one or more concurring opinions, what might be the impact? Might Shelby County v. Holder be considered a latter day Dred Scott? Might CJ Roberts display the skills of CJ Warren in Brown?

When Brown came down in 1954, I was finishing up law school at the age of 23. I recall well what happened as Brown was challenged on the ground and in Congress, even after the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s. I recall well Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy in the 1968 presidential campaign, remnants of which continue to this day. I recall well the treatment of Pres. Obama by conservatives from day one and continuing even with his reelection. This is a time for CJ Roberts to lead. Enough!


 

I neglected to include in the closing paragraph of my preceding comment this:

"I wonder how old the conservatives named by Doug in his post were in 1954 when Brown came down?"
 

Sam Tanenhaus' The New Republic essay (Feb. 10, 2013) "Original Sin - Why the GOP is and will continue to be the party of white people" includes some of what I recall from the days post-Brown v. Bd. of Educ. that I referenced in my earlier comment on Doug Kendall's recent related post at this Blog. I learned of this essay from Paul Krugman's NYTimes blog entry yesterday that provides a link and a comment about his view of the GOP in his "Conscience of a Liberal.".

Finley Peter Dunne's Mr. Dooley many generations ago sometimes commented on the Supreme Court following the election returns. Perhaps its conservative members also read "tea leaves." Tanenhaus makes no reference to the Shelby County appeal but read between the lines.
 

Why is the number of senators and representatives who supported the extension of the VRA of any significance in the debate? If Congress passes a law by the barest minimum in each chamber it is just as valid a law, yet this blog and several of the amici seem to feel that the size of the majorities should somehow make a difference in the legal argument.
 

Loyal Opposition apparently has more confidence in the unelected 5-4 judiciary than the elected, representative, branches. Why, especially when the elected branches do so overwhelmingly over time, including recently? Perhaps Loyal Opposition is suffering from Lindsey Graham-itis.
 


Thank you for the great article I did enjoyed reading it, I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back from again. I want to encourage that you continue your great job, have a good day.
e cigarette liquid


 

Thanks for sharing excellent informations. Your website is very cool. I’m impressed by the details that you’ve on this web site. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for more articles. click here to view std testing at home
 

toronto landscape designers, This is totally awesome! You have a great mind. This is interesting content I can respect and appreciate. It’s obvious you’re knowledgeable in this area.

 

Excellent! It is a successful article. The information is very useful. Thank so much!
collin county attorneys
 

This post is so well written and it's easy to see you know what you're talking about.
click here to view std testing at home
 

lawn care companies toronto, I really do enjoy this great website and your article was just wonderful. This is the ultimate blog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. Thanks for sharing all these valuable inform.


 

grounds maintenance, Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

 

permaculture course, I really do enjoy this great website and your article was just wonderful. This is the ultimate blog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. Thanks for sharing all these valuable inform.

 

permaculture course, Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

 

buy capsiplex, Thank You for creating quite a wonderful article I very much enjoyed browsing it.

 

buy capsiplex, These are all really great points made here. I hope many people gain access to this information. This is good quality writing deserving of attention.

 

fort worth doctor, There a good way to build up support and have seem to be working, I think it's a great idea.

 

fort worth emergency room, Great post, good work. It couldn't be wrote any better. Reading this post reminds me of my recent employer ! He constantly kept talking about this.

 

e juice
I really do enjoy this great website and your article was just wonderful. This is the ultimate blog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. Thanks for sharing all these valuable inform.
 

e juice
Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

 

landscaping companies, It isn’t often I take note of a writer, but you have done a bang up job here. I feel the same as you about this topic. Thanks for sharing.

 

Thanks for ones marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you might be a great author.I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back sometime soon. I want to encourage that you continue your great work, have a nice morning!
slim light boxes
 

Excellent! It is a successful article. The information is very useful. Thank so much!
Phoenix University
 

toronto landscapers, Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

 

markham landscaping, An attention-grabbing discussion is worth comment. I think that it’s best to write more on this topic, it may not be a taboo subject but generally persons are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

 

light box signage
It takes a special person to write a great quality article and you are such a person. The points you make in this writing are well thought out and written.

 

burleson silver sneakers, Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

 

burleson yoga, An attention-grabbing discussion is worth comment. I think that it’s best to write more on this topic, it may not be a taboo subject but generally persons are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

 

buy capsiplex, Can I just say what a relief to find someone who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people need to read this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

 

buy capsiplex, Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

 

lawn sprinklers toronto, It isn’t often I take note of a writer, but you have done a bang up job here. I feel the same as you about this topic. Thanks for sharing.

 

reception office signs
I feel the need to thank you for sharing your vast knowledge. It isn’t often I get to tell a writer “good job!”. Thanks for all the great informative content.
 

tattoo supply
However, if the scope of the Fifteenth Amendment right to vote is sufficiently ample, it can support even such strong remedies as pre-clearance. That is, is the right to vote protected from violation by a shell of derivative rights, such as a right against non-retrogression in redistricting, a right against arbitrary changes in registration and voting procedures, a right against suppression of turnout by location and quantity of polling places, etc.

 

copper signs
I really do enjoy this great website and your article was just wonderful. This is the ultimate blog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. Thanks for sharing all these valuable inform.

 

tarrant county hospital, Thank you for sharing such a good blog. I enjoyed reading it. Hope to read more post from you.

 

I have an interest in this topic and enjoyed reading your view on it. bourges
 

THANK you so much this is just the information that I needed. fireplace mantels
 

stainless steel signage
I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept. Thank you for the post.

 

What you say is true and I completely agree with your point of view. flash
 

Your have great insight about the subject of your post. click here to view addison criminal lawyer
 

You said exactly what I was thinking in this post and I wanted to say thanks. 3some
 

business signs
Straight to the point and well written! Why can’t everyone else be like this?

 

Your posts are so informative that I always come back for more. grab mckinney criminal lawyer
 

The information on this blog is always stimulating to read. canoe
 

Your article was great. I like your style.
plano texas attorney
 

The information on this blog is always stimulating to read. window cleaning san diego
 

This subject interests me greatly and I think what you said is right on. twit quiz
 

I love reading posts with such a fresh point of view on this interesting topic. metropol
 

home improvement contractors
That is, is the right to vote protected from violation by a shell of derivative rights, such as a right against non-retrogression in redistricting, a right against arbitrary changes in registration and voting procedures, a right against suppression of turnout by location and quantity of polling places, etc
 

business signs
Very nice post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wished to mention that I have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I am hoping you write again very soon!

 

I visited your site & after visiting i found that it is very informational for everyone you have done really a great job thank you timo
 

Search Engine Marketing Brisbane
That is, is the right to vote protected from violation by a shell of derivative rights, such as a right against non-retrogression in redistricting, a right against arbitrary changes in registration and voting procedures, a right against suppression of turnout by location and quantity of polling places, etc.

 

sleep study dallas
Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept. Thank you for the post.
 

I have an interest in this topic and enjoyed reading your view on it.canoe
 

Your blog has such good information that always makes me think. austin home loans
 

Your blog is very informative on the subject that interests me. twit quiz
 

office signage
Your blog is definitely worth a read if anyone finds it. I'm lucky I did because now I've got a whole new view of this

 

http://www.andy1stbirmingham.co.uk/
Thanks for the good post on your blog, it really gives me an insight on this subject.

 

http://www.potential-uk.co.uk/leicester.html
Subscribed to your blog, thanks
 

This subject is very stimulating and I thank you for this great post. austin credit union
 

building signage
Thanks for creating a great page I thoroughly liked reading through it.

 

Thanks for that great post and I appreciate the great blog you have. austin credit unions
 

business signs
I think this is one of the most vital information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The web site style is ideal, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers
 

http://www.potential-uk.co.uk/leicester.html
Thanks for ones marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you might be a great author.I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back sometime soon. I want to encourage that you continue your great work, have a nice morning!
 

open pan letters
Great post, I hope you don’t thoughts if I exploit this post as a part of my guide report?
 

Your blog has such good information that always makes me think.
University of Phoenix
 

This help me to widen my knowledge about what is your theme is. Thanks a lot for this information!
promotional displays
 

Your post made me look at the subject from a completely different angle.
austin texas bank
 

Your blog has such good information that always makes me thinkDivorce Attorney Las Vegas
 

SEO Consultants Brisbane
The general idea that Congress can address subject matter seems to me to be a major aspect of the brief, but that isn't really the biggest concern, is it?
 

Thank you for this post because it gave me so much great information. window washing san diego
 

residential remodeling
The general idea that Congress can address subject matter seems to me to be a major aspect of the brief, but that isn't really the biggest concern, is it?
 

You have a knack for writing thought provoking posts and I thank you. window washing san diego
 

Your blog is always informative and this post is no exception. Sparco Hand Brake Handles
 

Nice blog it rocks the way that you write makes me think differently.
Arts
 

Thank you for writing this blog this was what I was looking for.
social marketing
 

Really I'm impressed out of this post…The one that created this post can be a genius and learns how to keep your readers connected..Thank you for sharing this with us. I uncovered it informative and interesting. Excited for much more updates.plano law firm
 

Google, Face book and any other company would be G L A D to sell your information to everyone under the sun if they were allowed to.
london caterers
 

These kinds of articles are always attractive and I am happy to find so many good points here in the post. I appreciate it very much! I am looking forward to other share. Thank you so much! trending news
 


I never thought about looking at the topic in this way and I thank you for that.
Seo cardiff
 

Unfortunately I would not agree with anything written in this blog, sorry.
Seo cardiff
 

texas ppc
A search of available amicus briefs has me coming up empty handed. Can anyone help me out with this? I'd love to review it.
 

Thank you for the thoughtful article. Difficult and important topic.bodybuilding
 

Hope this answers your question, I am kind of new on the forums and still trying to gain knowledge.yoga
 

I am glad to see your article. I like it so much. And I think everyone does.
collin county attorney
 


Your astute observations have given me much to think about.
Nevada power of attorney
 


Your astute observations have given me much to think about.
http://www.gmdlegal.com/powers-of-attorney/
 

Interesting point of view and I agree with most of what you say.
Las Vegas kitchen remodeling
 

Thank you for a well written post, it really made me think.
Las Vegas general contractors
 


Your have great insight about the subject of your post.
solar iphone charger
 


Your take on the topic is certainly interesting and well done.
solar iphone charger
 

While I can't agree with all your points I did enjoy reading your post.
solar iphone charger
 


Your post made me look at the subject from a completely different angle.
adsl fpt binh duong
 

i am sure you spend a lot of time on doing this site! I'm really here to appreciate that you are a good blogger!!! singapore magento
 

I believe in what you have written here but I think a little more research could have been needed.
katy tx painter
 

I agree with a few of the points here but the others I do not agree with as much.
katy painter
 

I am not much into reading, but somehow I got to read lots of articles on your blog. Its amazing how interesting it is for me to visit you very often.web design singapore
 

This subject is very stimulating and I thank you for this great post.
lap mang fpt binh duong
 

I am kind interesting the movie that was being shared here. Thanks for this for I will shared it through my friend who loves move trip. Please share your comment with us. yoga
 


I like your style of writing, it's very thoughtful.
adsl fpt binh duong
 

Your have great insight about the subject of your post.
cap quang fpt binh duong
 


You have a knack for writing thought provoking posts and I thank you.
adsl fpt binh duong
 

This subject is very stimulating and I thank you for this great post.
Santa Monica dentist
 

The points you make are valid and I mostly agree with your ideas.
dentist Santa Monica
 

You have a unique point of view on the topic and I appreciate that.
katy tx painter
 


Thank you for stimulating my brain with this bright and observant post.
katy tx painter
 

You said exactly what I was thinking in this post and I wanted to say thanks.katy painter
 

There are a couple of points I don't agree with, but generally I like it.
cap quang fpt binh duong
 


I agree, this post is awesome and right to the point.
tong dai fpt binh duong
 

The information you provide on this blog is awesome.
adsl fpt binh duong
 

Your post made me look at the subject from a completely different angle.
adsl fpt binh duong
 

Your blog is very informative on the subject that interests me.
fpt binh duong
 

The information you provide on this blog is awesome.
lap mang fpt binh duong
 

I agree, this post is awesome and right to the point.
cap quang fpt binh duong
 

The information on this blog is always stimulating to read.
fpt binh duong
 

I don't agree with what you have written and I do believe more research should have been done but it was written well.
lap mang fpt binh duong
 

Thanks for providing some food for thought with this post.
Invisalign Santa Monica
 


You have a knack for writing thought provoking posts and I thank you.
dentist Santa Monica
 

While I can't agree on all your points, I think it's well written.
Cosmetic dentist Santa Monica
 

Thank you for this post because it gave me so much great information.
best hcg drops
 

Your blog is always informative and this post is no exception.
simply hcg
 

Thanks for that great post and I appreciate the great blog you have.
simply hcg
 


Your blog is very informative on the subject that interests me.
simplyhcgdrops.com
 

This blog is really very much interesting and if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did,
 

Regenerative Leadership Institute. Great blog as are all the rest found on this site. I know a couple of friends of mine who'll love this place so, I'll be sure to pass this site along to them. Thanks.
 

Regenerative Leadership Institute. This is a good common sense blog. Very helpful to one who is just finding the resources about this part. It will certainly help educate me.
 

Regenerative Leadership Institute. I am very satisfied with the content that you mentioned. I wanted to thank you for this great blog. I enjoyed every bit of his party and I'll be waiting for updates.
 

I am very impressed with…………
iphone developer
 

grosvenor house dubai. This was a really quality post. In theory I'd like to write like this too - taking time and real effort to make a good article. Thanks so much!
 

grosvenor house dubai. The post is good and interesting. It provide information that how important these certifications are. good work.
 

grosvenor house dubai. I highly appreciate your sharing. I hope you to continue posting on this topic.
 

Great blog as are all the rest found on this site. I know a couple of friends of mine who'll love this place so, I'll be sure to pass this site along to them. Thanks. chauffeur gezocht
 

I visited your site & after visiting i found that it is very informational for everyone you have done really a great job thank you
Los Angeles Credit Card Processing
 

Thanks for that great post and I appreciate the great blog you have.
 


Your astute observations have given me much to think about.
hcg weight loss drops
 


Thank you for stimulating my brain with this bright and observant post.
buy hcg drops
 


You said exactly what I was thinking in this post and I wanted to say thanks.
simply hcg
 


Thank you for this post because it gave me so much great information.
Toronto vinyl siding suppliers
 

Thank you for this post because it gave me so much great information.
Toronto vinyl siding suppliers
 

Crawling out of bed in the mornings is not easy for most people. Particularly if you need to do it really early in the morning, let's say before 7 am. While most get through with an alarm and a couple of snooze hits, there are some who just cannot rise early in spite of that.
dental magazine
 

While is it certainly the case that dentists should make their dental care of their patients their top priority, many seem to overlook the emotional care of the patients while they await their time with the dentist or dental hygienist.
Dentist La Jolla
 

Permaculture boasts no waste, no irrigation and high-yielding land use with less work. Permaculture farms produce as much as modern counterparts, but the methodology allows nature to take its course instead of using heavy machinery.
permaculture course
 

I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this post. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own blog now. Height Increasing Insoles.
 

It seems there are two big reasons people are reluctant to do more with their yards: money and time. But you can save a lot of both if you take a little time to consider how your yard fits into the environment around it and you can let Mother Nature do some of your gardening for you.
permaculture course
 

The amount of cash secured from these gold sales depends on the amount of gold in the jewelry pieces. Some consumers may opt for a trade-in transaction instead of getting cash in their hands. A trade-in transaction is where the consumer brings in a piece of jewelry to be traded in for another newer season piece with a top up payment.
sell diamonds nyc
 

I like it very much so that I will keep your new articles and continue to share them. Thanks so much for your comment. See you again. Shoe Lifts
 

I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own blog now iphone app developers for hire
 

iph one app development australia Some consumers may opt for a trade-in transaction instead of getting cash in their hands. A trade-in transaction is where the consumer brings in a piece of jewelry to be traded in for another newer season piece with a top up payment.
sell diamonds nyc
 

I admire the work that you do there. Must be a challenge to do a VIP blog each week. But very appreciated
 

Most of us are thankful to be working, and accept whatever the company gives us.
miami divorce lawyer
 

I am very impressed with…………
moving companies sacramento
 

I like your writing style. It is easy to understand the content of the article.
cane corso breeder
 

You have achieved success in persuading the reader. Congratulation!
air duct cleaners fort lauderdale
 

You have achieved success in persuading the reader. Congratulation!
 

You have achieved success in persuading the reader. Congratulation!
siding contractor Toronto
 

I wholeheartedly agree with your review
bend teeth whitening
 

The information on this blog is always stimulating to read.Roller Blinds Brisbane
 

Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us.
ottawa alarm systems
 

The observations you've made are right on, so keep it up!ce for dentists
 

I enjoy reading your article/ blog; I find most of them to be thoughtful and interesting
Toronto vinyl siding manufacturers
 

Your have great insight about the subject of your post.aspen colorado real estate
 

Post a Comment

Older Posts
Newer Posts
Home