E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
I'm sure that others have posted on these items, but on blogs that I may have missed. Both are from the minutes just before and just after the end of the Superbowl.
1. Just after the end, there was a classic "fleeting expletive." It's inconceivable to me that any sensible legal regime would impose liability for its dissemination; the effect of doing so would be to eliminate on-field microphones.
2. On (what turned out to be) San Francisco's final pass attempt, there was something that -- on viewing from multiple angles -- was pretty clearly either defensive holding or defensive pass interference (I'm not big on football technicalities -- but pretty clearly a defensive foul). From some angles the foul might not have been all that clear, and it wasn't called. The announcers initially said something like "Good call," but as the events were replayed from different angles, it was increasingly clear that the foul had occurred. And then the "law and sports" angle came in: The announcer said something like, "Well, it's OK not to call a foul like that at this point in the game" (and, I would add, probably where the pass couldn't have been caught in-bounds if at all -- it was quite high, and, although maybe the receiver could have jumped high enough to catch it, it didn't look to me as if, had he done so, he would have been able to land in-bounds). So, this is how umpires (here, referees) call balls and strikes (here, fouls) -- with sensitivity to the entire context in which the events occur.