E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
I was delighted to receive the information below in a mailing from the Liberty Fund. Barry Shain's book is simply terrific, an almost literally incredible scholarly feat of bringing together almost every conceivable document relating to the American colonists' critique of British rule and the relationship of this critique to the arguments set out in the Declaration of Independence. His introduction is a fascinating and valuable work in itself, for he argues that prior to the Declaration, the emphasis was almost exclusively on the "constitutional" illegitimacy of Parliamentary rule over the colonies (and not, for example, on the predations of King George, who was viewed as the potential savior from Parliamentary overreaching). Eric Nelson offers a similar argument in his very important new book, The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding (Harvard/Belknap, 2014). This is a golden age for reconceptualizations of the American Revolution (and, along the way, the Declaration of Independence, which will be the topic of a conference to be held next week at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia at which Jack and I will be presenting a paper arguing that we tend to ignore the emphasis of the Declaration on popular sovereignty and collective self-determination in favor of its throw-away line about inalienable rights.)
Shain's book was published last year by the Yale University Press, which charged $125, an almost reasonable price in context. (It's a beautifully produced book, in addition to being very long.) . But the glory of the Liberty Fund is its republication of many classics are readily affordable prices (with no stinting on production value). I realize this reads a lot like a commercial, but so be it. I really do think it's a terrific collection that should be on the shelves of anyone who professes to be interested in American political thought and that the Liberty Fund deserves kudos for making this readily available to anyone for a quite minimal cost (and a 20% discount is available until mid-May.
American State Papers, Petitions, Proclamations, & Letters of the Delegates to the First National Congresses
Compiled, Edited, and with an Introduction by Barry Alan
Shain
The Declaration of Independence, the document
that severed thirteen of Britain's North American continental colonies' ties
to the empire, was largely the product of twelve years of intermittent
conflict with Parliament during which time the colonists dutifully sought
relief and a closer relationship with their king. In sum, this collection
challenges, first, the American founding story as being one of opposition to
monarchy driven by an enthusiastic rather than a most reluctant
republicanism, and second , how we do this kind of history, by demonstrating
that cherry-picking documentary evidence without methodological controls can,
as it has done, produce competing historical narratives incapable of
adjudication and resolution.
This collection presented in this edition
show the reader the Declaration provided by the hundreds of continental-level
congressional state papers--declarations, petitions, resolutions, and
proclamations--and the debates and correspondence of those in attendance at
the first national congress.
Barry Alan Shain is professor of political
science and chair of the political science department at Colgate University.