Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts A fine proposal defeated by (among other things) the text of the Constitution
|
Thursday, December 11, 2008
A fine proposal defeated by (among other things) the text of the Constitution
Sandy Levinson
Wisconsin history professor John Milton Cooper has a column in today's NYTimes entitled "The Pause That Depresses," which criticizes the hiatus between election and inauguration. Cooper, a noted Wilson scholar (who taught my wife a fine course in American history years ago at Wellesley), notes that Woodrow Wilson had resolved, had he lost the election of 1916 to Charles Evans Hughes, which turned on the California vote, to name Hughes Secretary of State and then, together with his Vice President, Thomas Marshall, resign so that Hughes could take office immediately. That, of course, proved unnecessary when Wilson carried California by fewer than 4000 votes. Cooper believes that Wilson would have been acting in the public interest and believes as well that we should today try to achieve a solution to the overly-long hiatus. (Obviously, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are less public spirited than Woodrow Wilson, but that's another matter. Also, for what it's worth, Cooper doesn't make mention of Wilson's scandalous resolve to remain President following his debilitating stroke in October 1919 or his delusional desire to be drafted for a third term in 1920.) Our current interregnum and its predecessor in 1933 have not been the only peril-filled transfers of power in our history — 1861 was the scariest of them all — and there ought to be a way to avoid or at least shorten such anxious passages. It is worth asking whether Woodrow Wilson’s idea could be wisely applied now. The present law of succession appears to rule it out because the speaker of the House, not the secretary of state, is now third in line. But this line of succession is not graven in stone, much less embedded in the Constitution. Congress has changed it several times, most notably at the end of World War II, when the succession shifted to include more elected officials, but as recently as 2005, when Congress designated the secretary of homeland security as 18th in line. In fact, it is not even necessary to change the order, only to add a provision — a version of Wilson’s plan — allowing a president to resign after a successor is elected and have that successor take office immediately. There’s no risk this would become standard practice, because outgoing presidents rarely want to leave before their terms expire. But we still need a procedure for the quicker transition of power in troubled times like these.
Comments:
Why does the author say that George Bush and Dick Cheney are less public-spirited than Woodrow Wilson? This left-wing habit of insisting that those who disagree with you politically are not just wrong, but evil, really degrades our public discourse.
The answer to Sean's snarky question seems self-evident: Woodrow Wilson was apparently willing to quite the presidency had he been repudiated by the American public in the 1916 election. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have no such impulses. They will hang on to their legal powers until high noon on January 20, 2009 even though they are the most disapproved-of president and vice president in the history of American polling. I suppose that the answer to my objection is that they genuinely fear the changes to be brought by the Obama Administration and that, therefore, they are really acting in "the public interest" by hanging on to power for dear life. Thay may well be their perception, though I have no doubt that Wilson, like Bush infected with a messianic personality, also deemed himself a far better steward of the public than Charles Evans Hughes.
In any event, I hope that we can all agree that Cooper's suggestion depends for its cogency on the willingness of incumbents to resign and thus voluntarily forego their otherwise constitutionally-guaranteed last days in office.
It seems to me that, at least according to the Amars' argument, it would be more constitutional to amend the Succession Act to include the President-Elect. The amendment only needs to establish the President-Elect as an officer of the Executive Branch. That office would not even need Senate confirmation, as long the legislation clearly spells out that the winner of the electoral college vote is the only person qualified for the job.
We could even move up the Electoral College vote to a week after the election (gotta give Alaska time to collect all those votes from remote areas).
We are a government of laws, not of men. This message has been drilled in us from early in the study of law. But the application of laws (including well intended laws) can sometimes be manipulated by men in unanticipated ways. Some men hunt for loopholes for personal benefit. Any amendment should be bulletproof.
Ah, so what Prof. Levinson meant to say is that, sadly, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson and Jimmy Carter were less public-spirited than Woodrow Wilson, and have established the regrettable precedent that, even in times of war and economic turmoil, the president remains in office until the end of his term, and that George Bush will be following the precedent of those loutish and unpatriotic individuals.
You see how much more persuasive the argument would be as so formulated, because it would be clear that this is not a partisan point, and would give the reader confidence that Prof. Levinson will be clamoring for the early resignation of the next Democratic president who is due to be replaced by a Republican successor. Unfortunately, Prof. Levinson's formulation gives the reader no such confidence.
This left-wing habit of insisting that those who disagree with you politically are not just wrong, but evil, really degrades our public discourse.
Both sides of that particular divide dehumanize and demonize the other--it isn't a diagnostic feature of either group. Or have you already forgotten that liberals are just as good as--if not worse than--terrorists? Methinks you should quit drinking the coffee in the faculty lounge--it's going to your head.
This sounds like the makings og the plot of Treasure of the Sierra Madre".
The President has to resign and get the Vice President to resign then get the Speaker of the House - someone who spent a career trying to get there - must resign. The Best Case is that the speaker would then rely on the collusion of the entire party caucus to put him/her back in that position after the inauguration. The first line of defense against becoming a victim of crime is to require that the criminal must collude with others to pull off the caper. Even with the best of intentions, to pull this off requires an exponential order of cooperation that may have been beyond the politbureau.
Well, make the person an officer! The piece noted that Wilson planned to appoint Hughes as Secretary of State. This was a key part of the plan, since that office was third in line at the time.
The rule is an "officer" can be set as next in line. It could even be an inferior one, which need not be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Not that this is too important given the POTUS here would have to resign, so one would assume would appoint the right person. So, after the election, or what have you, Congress creates some new gov't office. Anything would do, apparently. This office would in part be next in line after the v.p. What is the constitutional problem?
"Both sides of that particular divide dehumanize and demonize the other--it isn't a diagnostic feature of either group."
Actually, I think it's really striking how much less civil the bloggers and commenters are on this site compared to Volokh Conspiracy.
Actually, I think it's really striking how much less civil the bloggers and commenters are on this site compared to Volokh Conspiracy.
Huh. I would have said the exact opposite was true. And that's with fairly significant monitoring of comments by some posters at Volokh.
…the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
But at this point, hasn’t another President been elected? If not, certainly that will be true after the Electoral College meets. What was expected to happen after a President was elected and both the President and Vice-President were out of office? The wording above suggests that he was expected to be sworn in immediately. Not that Bush and Cheney are interested in resigning. They’re too busy removing science from the Endangered Species Act, and anywhere else they can.
Wouldn't it be simpler for the VP to resign (see Agnew), a new VP to be nominated and confirmed (Ford), and the President to resign (Nixon)? I agree that the lame duck period is a major Constitutional flaw, but I don't see how it prevents an early succession when all parties agree. They clearly don't. Among other things, it would ruin the party schedule at Blair House.
What we need here is a permanent fix to the problem, and that can only be done by amending the Constitution.
Specifically, the Constitution should be amended so that the president-elect decides when he takes office.
tell me which side i'm on
Post a Comment
approaching constant failure who's friend or foe? between love and hate which path to follow? how can i keep balance in this race? come faith i'm dying.. slowly
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers ![]() Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) ![]() David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) ![]() Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). ![]() Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) ![]() Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) ![]() Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) ![]() Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) ![]() Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) ![]() Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution ![]() Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) ![]() Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) ![]() Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) ![]() Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) ![]() Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic ![]() Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) ![]() David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) ![]() Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |