E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Jim Gibbons's recent academic haiku contest (via Crooked Timber), was a stroke of genius. The idea is to summarize your latest academic work, whether a paper or Ph.D thesis, in the famous five syllable, seven syllable, five syllable form. If your article has multiple theses, you may have a haiku for each one, but don't overdo it! This is haiku, not epic poetry.
The academic haiku is a brilliant innovation precisely because nobody these days has time to read even the abstracts to the endless stream of academic publications that flow ceaselessly before us, much less peruse the actual publications themselves. The flood of SSRN news letters I regularly receive drive me almost to despair. How much better it would be to be sent a series of short, evocative, gnomic stanzas summarizing the authors' ideas in seventeen syllables.
Moreover, as a memeticist, I am always on the lookout for new ways for academics to spread their memes ever more widely. The haiku is a far better meme than the abstract could ever be. It entices, it inveigles, it leaves the reader wanting more. The haiku is the delightful amuse bouche to the abstract's dry and tasteless dinner roll.
The shorter, the more alluring and the more ambiguous a cultural replicator, the more widely it will spread in a population, drawing people to investigate the abstract and perhaps even the underlying work.
The academic haiku is nothing less the academic soundbite of our times.
But enough talk. It is time for action.
I propose that every scholar-- and certainly anyone who sends a work to an academic journal or posts a new piece on SSRN-- should always provide three things: (1) the academic haiku, followed by (2) the 300 word abstract, followed by (3) the actual work itself, in that order. This will let readers know how far they need to read before they inevitably become distracted by some other glistening bauble in our Information age.
Hoping to turn Gibbons's idea into something more than a one-time contest, I hereby announce as a continuing feature (until either I or the readership gets completely tired of it) the Academic Haiku of the Week here at Balkinization.
This week, I present a haiku of a recent work of my own, and one I wrote in honor of Sandy Levinson's latest book.
Original meaning, The Living Constitution, Are one and the same.
Abortion bans are Compulsory motherhood, Class legislation.
Glad you liked the concept! One of the contestants referred to these haiku as abstracts, and I think that's exactly what they are. So let me be the first to second your idea - I think it's a great one.
I figured that someone would figure out that the word "original" could be pronounced with three syllables (or-RIG-nal) and four syllables (or-RIG-i-nal). Like a good living constitutionalist (and original meaning originalist) I decided to delegate this question to future interpreters.
I figured that someone would figure out that the word "original" could be pronounced with three syllables (or-RIG-nal) and four syllables (or-RIG-i-nal).