| Balkinization   |
|
Balkinization
|
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Why We Write Books
Brian Tamanaha
Let's be clear: It's not for the money. Academic books take several thousand hours to research and write. Many university press books sell only a few hundred copies (mainly to libraries). A scholarly book that gets over the 2000 sales mark is doing very well. I get about two dollars for every paperback copy sold, and about five dollars for every hardcover copy sold (based on a 10% author royalty). I've earned about $3000 or so for each of my last three books (ignoring the total of $300 that I received for my first book). You can figure out the hourly rate of return from this information (I prefer not to do the calculation myself).
Comments:
Given what you've said, why don't more authors ask their publishers for permission to post the full-text online free, so that it gets disseminated as widely as possible?
x.
I would have no problem with that, but publishers are in the business to make money (naturally). As long as the book sells (and with the new print on demand technology), it is not in their economic interest to comply with the request. Authors can go the self-publish, self-dissemination-for-free route, but the book will not be taken seriously unless the author is a big name (and even then there will be raised eyebrows). Brian
Brian,
I thought the haiku was supposed to replace the abstract, not the jacket blurbs. Of course you think it's a good book, but what the hell is it about?
I guess it is about time I buy a few of these books (once I clear the in-basket a bit). I'm particularly interested in Balkin's "Cybercrime"; I have an professional interest (so to speak) in the CALEA laws and the means of interception and analysis, as well as my longer standing interest in constitutional law.....
Cheers,
You guys are fantastic, thanks for blogging so us who are not legal experts can get the scholarly look at what's going on with things like FISA and Guantanamo.
I'll be sure to check out your books, as well as your colleagues at Balkinization's, Brian.
Commercial publishers, yes--but university presses claim *not* to be in the business to make money. Yale UP, for example, is a *department of the university*, and speaks of its mission in these terms: "By publishing serious works that contribute to a global understanding of human affairs, Yale University Press aids in the discovery and dissemination of light and truth, lux et veritas, which is a central purpose of Yale University." It seems like if this is taken seriously, it then becomes an open question how best to spread knowledge, and how best to finance it within universities. (Aside from the empirical question of whether it would even hurt revenue--after all, most of the potential audience can already get the book through a library; people buy things for somewhat different reasons than just reading them.)
(I note that some presses seem to be taking tentative steps in this directions, as with Balkin's book, and Benkler's, etc. May these experiments continue!)
Don't the same "problems" apply equally to articles (time consuming, may not be published [or may be published in a journal you're not happy with], may be criticized, etc.)? And with articles you don't get any royalties from publication. It seems like the main reason to write books is the same reason you'd write an article, or an op-ed: because you have something to say. It just so happens that your thought sometimes turns into a 2 page op-ed; sometimes a 50 page article; and sometimes a 200 page book.
University presses used to be in the business of publishing their own professors' work -- i.e., if you taught at Michigan, then Michigan's UP was your forum.
Post a Comment
But UPs were financial sink-holes, so schools started cutting support. To survive, presses had to worry more about sales. To do this they started competing for authors/works that had a better chance of selling -- and they also started feeling out niche markets. UPs might "claim" to be in the business of spreading knowledge -- and I don't think that's an empty claim. But I think you infer too much from it, when you conclude that they're not out to make money. I don't think they're looking for huge profits -- but they do have to sell to survive. The real hindrance to the dissemination of these works, as I see it, is the problem of reliability or credibility that Brian touched on. If you self-publish a book to "get it out there," it won't be taken seriously because it hasn't gone through the vetting process. UPs provide credibility -- along with publication and distribution -- but they have no incentive to provide it for free. I do think, though, that it should be possible to make online, pdf-style versions of books available for download for a nominal fee. Say, $3.99. I would think this would increase sales substantially (thus increasing dissemination) -- and I don't see how there would be much overhead for the publisher. I'm not sure why UPs haven't moved in this direction yet...? As for articles -- I think Kevin's basically right. But also, sometimes publishing a few articles is necessary to establishing a "name" for yourself, to make the book publishing more likely. This is where motivations other than money come into play. Most UPs won't really consider your book ms unless you've got a few publications to your name already -- usually articles in good journals. Again, it goes to the vetting/credibility issue: if you've been published already, you've been vetted already. Considering all of this, it's no surprise that blogging generally lacks any scholarly "pull" -- because anyone can throw up a blog. (Pun intended.)
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers
Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009)
Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009)
Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009)
Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) Neil Netanel, Copyright's Paradox (Oxford Univ. Press 2008)
David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007)
Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007)
Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006)
Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006)
Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006)
Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006)
Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006)
Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005)
Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |