E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
The drive for more transparent democratic institutions continues. But Saul Levmore long ago realized that the "Anonymity Tool" could deter corruption and further other democratic values.
Tony Blair's leadership has been threatened this spring by allegations that "secret political payments were rewarded with seats in the house of Lords." The traditional response is to simply require disclosure, but in a recent oped in the Financial Times, Bruce Ackerman and I argue that mandating anonymous contributions is a more powerful means of insulating the political sphere from uneven distribution of wealth in our economy.
Barry Nalebuff and I in a recent Forbes column argue that the anonymity tool can also help us make progress with CEO compensation consultants. If compensation consultants aren't told which company they are representing, but instead are asked to rank a group of CEOs, it will be a lot harder for them to say that the entire group is above average.
Several people have argued in the campaign finance arena that the costs of anonymity are too great -- especially the cost of depriving citizens of "voting cues." But in a forthcoming University of Chicago Law Review essay, Bruce and I argue that it is feasible to combine elements of disclosure and annomity in a single system. Under what we call "The Secret Refund Booth," contributions are immediately disclosed but contributors have a 5 day cooling off period to request a refund. The public gets a complete and accurate list of everyone who has tried to influence a candidate, but the candidate can't be sure whether any individual contributor actually paid the price. Posted
9:47 AM
by Ian Ayres [link]