E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Here is the text of the House bill and the Senate bill. The Senate bill is the one that is likely to pass.
The Senate bill looks like a final exam in a Federal Courts course. De novo review of state court findings. No Younger abstention. No requirement of exhaustion of remedies.
You just can't make this stuff up.
So you may be thinking, what's all this about federal injunctions against ongoing state court proceedings? Whatever happened to Hugo Black and "Our Federalism?" Well, there's at least one important difference here: the injunction against concurrent state judicial proceedings wouldn't be in violation of the Anti-injunction act, because there is express authorization from Congress.
Just reading the thing gives me a constitutional headache. I've been arguing in several places that, contrary to popular belief, Michael Schiavo did not make the decision to remove the tube. The court did, acting as Terri's surrogate, after determining, by clear and convincing evidence, that it is her wish. This was done through the normal course of Florida law.
Its a great pleasure reading your post.Its full of information I am looking for and I love to post a comment that "The content of your post is awesome" Great work Golf Betting AdviceLiga Spanyol
Thanks for the info, maybe I can use this ended my tufted marketing and I've been use untold anulus media in run a interaction and they someone existing a big amend on me. Judi BolaVillage Resort
Until you do your best, don't try to take a rest. Until you take a leap, don't try to sleep. Until you top, don't try to stop. Agen Judi Online Terpercaya