E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Ran Hirschl was a pathbreaking scholar, an even better human being, and an even better friend. Words cannot capture his impact on scholarship and on the lives of the numerous scholars he touched. The excerpts from a letter on his behalf are a weak attempt to do justice to him and his legacy. They remain in the present tense because through his works, example, and encouragement, Ran will always be with him.
Hirschl is the leading thinker on
comparative constitutionalism in the world.
No political scientist in the public law field, no political scientists
in the comparative government field, no law professor, and no member of any
other discipline has come close to his achievements. Each of Professor Hirschl’s books is
acknowledged as path-breaking. No one
knows more about constitutional developments in different parts of the
world. No one has done more to inspire
the contemporary renaissance in comparative constitutionalism. No one has
played a greater leadership role in this comparative constitutional revival. You could divide Hirschl’s resume in half and
probably thirds and each piece would have a powerful case for a lifetime
achievement award in numerous disciplines and in numerous fields within those disciplines.
Hirschl
has a stunning range of expertise, a range that dwarfs any other scholar that I
know of in political science or law. One
finds in his publications a sophisticated understanding of political theory,
all aspects of public law, and comparative politics. He has clearly mastered the literature on
democratic theory, on constitutional interpretation, on law and society, and on
judicial politics. He seems to have
mastered the general literature on comparative constitutional law, and the
specific constitutional politics of almost every country with constitutional
politics. His chapter on case studies in
Comparative Matters is an extraordinary methodological piece, one I
regular insist my students examine. I have always been particularly impressed
with Professor Hirschl’s capacity to both know the details of what almost every
constitutional court in the world is doing and to organize those details into
theoretically rich arguments. Maybe
somewhere in an obscure province in India, a constitutional development exists
that Hirschl does not know about. But
neither I nor any of the numerous reviewers of his works have been able to
identify this omission. I am confident
Vulcan of Star Trek fame is fiction,
because Professor Hirschl has never discussed the Constitution of Vulcan.
This
erudition extends far beyond law and political science. Consider the first chapter of City, State:
The Constitutionalism and the Megacity.
The chapter begins with an extensive discussion of what almost every
social science field has said about cities for the past fifty years. Hirschl seems to have a fluency in subjects
ranging from sociology to architecture that would do experts in those field
proud. Perhaps I need to get out more,
but I cannot think of a scholar in any field whose expertise ranges over so
much political science, so much law and so much scholarship as Professor
Hirschl. The other books are
similar. Hirschl does not simply master
law and political science. He masters
whatever disciplines are necessary to cast light on his subject matters.
Professor Hirschl’s forthcoming book,
Constitutionalism 2050 points out that the traditional nation-state no
longer serves to manage central problems.
The problems regimes face, from climate change to globalization to
pandemics are now international. Local
national governance, he observes, weakens human capacity to respond to these
problems. Constitutionalism must go
global for the human race to survive.
Putting aside jealously, I had two thoughts when he was presented. Sandy Levinson accurately describes this work
as the most important book on constitutionalism published in the twenty-first
century. As always the erudition is remarkable;
the thesis strikingly original, and the importance speaks for itself.
Professor Hirschl is a fellow of the
Royal Society of Canada, which is the equivalent of being a member of the
American Academic for the Arts and Sciences in the United States (both are
academic halls of fame).He has held
distinguished chairs at the University of Toronto, the University of Texas, and
the Max Planck Institute in Germany, as well as holding distinguished visitor
chairs at the National University of Singapore, New York University and Harvard
Law School.He has won national and
global awards for scholarship and delivered addresses, often named, at almost
every major university in the world.He
is a former Co-President of the International Society of Public Law and one of
the founders of that organization.He
has published many edited collections and nearly one-hundred essays, many of
which have been republished and translated elsewhere.The evidence clearly indicates, I should
add, that none of his works seem to have been written by Christopher Marlowe.
Professor
Hirschl excels at all facets of the academy.
He was an award-winning teacher at Toronto. When I wrote his recommendation for the
Canada Research Chair, the University of Toronto presented me with as strong a
set of teaching evaluations, both for graduate students and undergraduates, as
I recall seeing. He has helped mentor
the younger generation of comparativists.
You see Professor Hirschl’s name in manuscripts by junior scholars
warmly thanking him for the time and energy he gave to reviewing junior
manuscripts. He has been a leader in
comparative constitutionalism, not just as a scholar, but as a founder and
leader of the International Society of Public Law. Thanks in significant part to his efforts,
ICON-S is probably the most important site in the world for comparative
constitutionalism. Finally, on a
personal note he is a warm and trusted friend to many of us in the academy.
Professor
Hirschl has a global reputation for excellence and as fine a global reputation
for decency. He is an outstanding
teacher, mentor, colleague, and friend.
There will be a program at APSA honored his memory and achievements. Others are in the works. All we can do for the present is miss terribly this amazing scholar, human being and friend.