E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Debt Limit Charade Redux: The Humiliation of the Moderates
David Super
As derisive as my post
of yesterday was about the courage of GOP moderates, events showed that I actually
gave them too much credit.The quick and
humiliating capitulation of the few Members posturing as GOP moderates confirms
that there is no path to a negotiated solution to the debt limit problem and
puts the ball squarely in President Biden’s court.
After describing concessions
the Republican leadership made to the corn industry and its far-right, I
predicted that “[l]ikely more [tweaks] are to come.”I did so because House GOP moderates had been
circulating a (very) short list for over a week of changes they were insisting
that the leadership make in the bill to secure their votes.
These changes
would have eliminated neither the unseriousness
of the bill nor its fundamental cruelty.They would not have alleviated the recklessness of its repeal (with very
small transition provisions for the corn industry) of the Inflation Reduction
Act’s efforts to combat climate change.And they would not have altered the provision that would gut Internal
Revenue Service funding for pursuing affluent tax cheats, a move the Congressional
Budget Office estimates
would increase the deficit by $120 billion over ten years.
The moderates’
only demands were the removal of a (very) few of the most sensationally cruel sections
of the bill, sections that contributed very modestly to the bill’s estimated
deficit-reducing effects.Indeed, had
the leadership removed the sections to which the moderates objected and also
the reduction in IRS funding, the bill’s estimated bottom line would have been
essentially unchanged.
I did not think
the moderates would get their full list, even as modest as it was, but I
assumed they would get something, even something merely cosmetic.I was wrong. The leadership ordered them to vote for a
final bill that was somewhat worse than the one to which they had objected on
the issues they were raising.
And every single
one of the so-called moderates went along.The four negative GOP votes were all
from the far-right Freedom Caucus:Matt
Gaetz, Andy Biggs, etc.The moderates
abased themselves completely.And
because they were widely known to be holding out for changes, the fact that they
got absolutely none shows everyone how complete the leadership’s contempt for
them is – and how wholly lacking in backbone they are.
When moderate
Democrats have resisted legislation in the House or Senate of previous
Democratic-controlled Congresses, Democratic leaders almost invariably offered
them some concessions, albeit often less than the holdouts desired.Senate Republican Leader McConnell operates
similarly, as did former Republican House Speakers John Boehner and Paul
Ryan.
This complete,
public humiliation of the so-called House Republican moderates demonstrates the
far-right’s utter domination of that caucus.It also is a further humiliation of Speaker McCarthy, who presumably requested
but was denied permission to offer the moderates some fig-leaf.And the so-called moderates’ meek acceptance
of their humiliation confirms that they believe the threat of primaries from
the far right precludes any assertiveness whatsoever.
Just as some kept
holding out hope in January that the moderates would band together with the
Democrats to elect one of their own as speaker, some now imagine that the House
Republican moderates will join with Democrats to sign a discharge petition to
bring a clean debt limit fix to the House floor and avert a fiscal high-noon.This episode demonstrates that the House
leadership does not regard that as a sufficiently plausible possibility to
afford those moderates even a modicum of respect.
Whether or not the
U.S. defaults on its debt now depends entirely on whether Joe Biden is willing
to adopt either a technical solution (such as authorizing the minting of a platinum
coin with a high enough denomination to allow the Treasury to pay the country’s
bills under 31
U.S.C. 5112(k)) or to declare the debt limit unconstitutional under Section
4 of the Fourteenth Amendment.There
will be, and can be, no negotiated settlement with this House Republican
Party.
By the way, for
those keeping score at home, we are now almost two weeks past the statutory
deadline for House and Senate concurrence on this year’s Congressional Budget
Resolution.If the House GOP was, as
Speaker McCarthy repeatedly insists, determined to bring our nation’s fiscal
house into order, one would expect at a minimum that it would introduce, report
out, and pass a budget resolution as required by law.It will not do so, of course, because that
would require it to add at least some specificity about where it would make the
one-third
reduction in appropriations for programs other than defense and veterans’
health care.And that would either anger
those who want a federal government that continues to function or expose the
GOP’s supposed budget cuts for the unserious fraud that they are.