Balkinization |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahman sabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Claiming Equal Dignity
|
Monday, October 05, 2020
Claiming Equal Dignity
Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on William N. Eskridge, Jr., and Christopher Riano, Marriage Equality: From Outlaws to In-Laws (Yale University Press, 2020).
Stuart F. Delery Marriage Equality by William Eskridge and Christopher Riano arrives billed as a comprehensive history of the fight for same-sex marriage, but it actually goes further to explore the broader campaign for LGBTQ+ equality over the past half century. The book tells a great story, as much of a page-turner as you will find in an academic study. It weaves compelling individual portraits together with deep analysis of judicial doctrine, social movements, litigation strategy, and legislative debates. Although I thought I was fairly familiar with this history (and I play small parts in several chapters in the story), I learned a tremendous amount. Many aspects of Marriage Equality are worthy of comment, but to me the core of the book is its careful account of the critical role played by ordinary LGBTQ+ people in communities across the country. The authors never lose sight of how choices by individuals and couples to live their lives openly and with dignity, often in the face of personal and public hostility, ultimately compelled the Supreme Court to recognize their legal right to be treated on equal terms by their government. As Eskridge and Riano ably describe, the Supreme Court’s recent constitutional LGBTQ+ rights decisions are all grounded on the concept of equal dignity. Lawrence v. Texas said that individuals who enter into same-sex relationships “still retain their dignity as free persons,” that gay people “are entitled to respect for their private lives,” and that “[t]he State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime.” In United States v. Windsor, the Court recognized that decisions by states to recognize same-sex marriages “conferred upon them a dignity and status of immense import” and held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was invalid because “no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity.” And Obergefell v. Hodges ends with a simple but ringing description of the claim to marriage equality by same-sex couples: “They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”This recognition was not simply bequeathed by a benevolent judiciary. In the words of the Supreme Court in Obergefell, LGBTQ+ people themselves demanded to “vindicate their own direct, personal stake in our basic charter.” Eskridge and Riano draw a direct connection between the Supreme Court’s understanding of dignity and the grassroots articulation and embodiment of that principle, starting with how early advocate Frank Kameny and the Mattachine Society framed their mission in the early 1960s: “to secure for the homosexual the right, as a human being, to develop and achieve his full potential and dignity, and the right, as a citizen, to make his maximum contribution to the society in which he lives.” The authors carefully chronicle the sea change in public attitudes in the 50 years between the declaration by Frank Kameny and the victories of Edie Windsor and Jim Obergefell. The AIDS crisis in the 1980s “revealed that gay relationships could engender the same kind of selfless, till-death-do-us-part devotion as traditional marriages.” Lawyers and other advocates recognized that it was critical to have a national campaign to educate and persuade the public before launching court challenges. Political debates about marriage in state legislatures highlighted the experiences of hundreds of same-sex couples and their families. Civil union and domestic partnership benefit programs, and later early same-sex marriages in Massachusetts, California and other states, showed the broader public that committed same-sex couples would not cause the sky to fall. Eskridge and Riano conclude that this “equality practice” and campaign of public education “called for straight people to see gay and lesbian couples as committed to serious, long-term relationships, often with children, that deserved respect and support for the same reason that straight marriages deserved respect and support.” And this effort was successful. It should be noted that the authors thoroughly document the leading role played in the years-long effort by lesbian and transgender people, the importance of which cannot be overstated. One critical factor undergirding our progress has always been the willingness of countless lesbians, gay men, and transgender individuals to be open about their lives. Once people can say that they know a gay, lesbian, or transgender person, they are much more likely to support our rights. This is true of family members, neighbors, co-workers, legislators, judges, and Executive Branch officials. As Eskridge and Riano put it, “[i]t was harder to be angry about gay marriage when your barber, your neighbor, your city council member, your aunt, your kid’s teacher, or your daughter was gay-partnered.” The lived experience of LGBTQ+ couples and families ultimately became impossible for the government to deny. As a Department of Justice brief said on behalf of the United States, “same-sex couples form deeply committed relationships that bear the hallmarks of their neighbors’ opposite-sex marriages: they establish homes and lives together, support each other financially, share the joys and burdens of raising children, and provide care through illness and comfort at the moment of death.” Once courts were convinced of this, the result in the marriage cases was hard to avoid. The Obergefell Court made a point of saying that “[t]he petitioners’ stories make clear the urgency of the issue they present to the Court.” But the Tenth Circuit may have best captured the dynamic when it said (quoting the district court in Utah), “it is not the Constitution that has changed, but the knowledge of what it means to be gay or lesbian.” The victory was won by all of the LGBTQ+ people who shared the mundane ups and downs of their lives with co-workers just as straight people do; by every young person who came out to parents and family, often with painful consequences for personal relationships; and by every couple that refused to accept an inferior status from their government. With the Supreme Court in transition, the LGBTQ+ community is understandably concerned about the path forward. Recent progress, while real, is also young and therefore in some ways fragile. Courts can change decisions. The White House was lit up in rainbow colors the night of the Obergefell decision just over five years ago, but as we have seen the federal government will not always be an ally. Eskridge and Riano have a lesson for us now: perhaps the best protection LGBTQ+ people have against judicial backsliding is to continue to claim equal dignity by living our lives day in and day out consistent with the rights we know the Constitution guarantees to us. Just as doing so was key to the victories in the first place. Finally, in light of the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, it is worth noting that Eskridge and Riano detail the role that she played in securing marriage equality and in LGBTQ+ rights more generally. Justice Ginsburg did not write the landmark LGBTQ+ rights opinions, but she was in the majority in each case and her mark was unmistakable. For example, in the Windsor argument, the authors note, Justice Ginsburg flagged that “DOMA’s pervasive regime of excluded benefits and duties created a new institution, what Ginsburg called ‘skim milk marriages,’ which differed from the full-blown marriages available to most couples.” Justice Kennedy’s ensuing opinion for the Court echoed this view and found intolerable the federal government’s decision to relegate same-sex couples to “second-class marriages for purposes of federal law.” In the Obergefell argument, Justice Ginsburg pointed out that the institution of marriage had already changed substantially over time. The authors also report that Justice Ginsburg urged Justice Kennedy to add the equal protection element to the Court’s reasoning, fusing the concepts of liberty and equality to guarantee same-sex couples the right to marry. More generally, Eskridge and Riano explicitly ground marriage equality for LGBTQ+ couples in Justice Ginsburg’s “constitutional vision for the family” based on gender equality and heightened equal protection scrutiny for sex-based classifications. The great work of Justice Ginsburg’s life was a key building block for LGBTQ+ rights and “equal dignity.” From the beginning of the Nation, there has been a contradiction between our founding ideals of freedom and equality and the reality for too many. A common theme across our history has been the struggle to lay claim to the Nation’s promise; “[a]s the Constitution endures,” the Court said in Lawrence, “persons in every generation can invoke its principles in their own search for greater freedom.” I remember vividly first reading Simple Justice, Richard Kluger’s magisterial account of the road to Brown v. Board of Education, in college. It galvanized my thinking about how much work remained to achieve equality, and also about what the law and lawyers could and should do to work towards that goal. Eskridge and Riano have produced a study of similar scope, one that should be both canonical for the history of the LGBTQ+ community and inspiring for advocates for greater equality of all kinds in our society. Stuart F. Delery is a litigation partner in the Washington, D.C office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and a Visiting Lecturer in Law at Yale Law School. He can be reached at SDelery@gibsondunn.com.
Posted 9:30 AM by Guest Blogger [link]
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers ![]() Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) ![]() David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) ![]() Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). ![]() Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) ![]() Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) ![]() Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) ![]() Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) ![]() Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) ![]() Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution ![]() Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) ![]() Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) ![]() Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) ![]() Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) ![]() Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic ![]() Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) ![]() David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) ![]() Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |