Balkinization |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahman sabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts The Abortion Closet
|
Monday, April 03, 2017
The Abortion Closet
David Pozen Cross-posted at Concurring Opinions (About Abortion Symposium) An enormous amount of information and insight is packed into Carol Sanger’s About Abortion: Terminating Pregnancy in Twenty-First Century America. The book is anchored in post-1973 American case law. Yet it repeatedly incorporates examples and ideas from popular culture, prior historical periods, moral philosophy, feminist theory, medicine, literature and the visual arts, and more.
The
panoramic ambition of the book, and its correspondingly multi-disciplinary
method, are established in the first chapter, in a section titled “What
Abortion Is About.” By the end of this section,
the reader has learned something about: Roe
v. Wade; various international treaties on the rights of women; abortion
training protocols in medical schools; the neurological development of a fetus;
the 2012 Republican presidential primary; a 1995 papal encyclical; a 1984
lecture by the New York Governor; a 2001 concurrence by a Mississippi Supreme
Court Justice; the 2003 decision by the FDA to approve the “morning-after-pill”
for over-the-counter sale; the anti-abortion turn within certain Protestant denominations
in the 1970s and 80s; sociological research on pro-life activists and their
views on sex; anthropological research on pregnancy termination decisions
following a diagnosis of fetal disability; prostitution laws in New York; abstinence-only
programs in Texas; President George W. Bush’s Culture of Life; the rise and
rise of parental involvement statutes and personhood amendments; the rise and
fall of federal support for family planning organizations and abortion services
to pregnant soldiers; the intensifying politics of abortion in state judicial
elections; the recent Hobby Lobby litigation
over the Affordable Care Act; and the Supreme Court’s decision last Term in Whole Woman’s Health.
This
section lasts fourteen pages. It is a
testament to Sanger’s skill as a writer and to her synthetic capacities as a
thinker that one comes away from this whirlwind tour feeling not vertigo, but
rather an enhanced sense of clarity about the arc of abortion regulation. While the pace soon slows down, the rest of
the book maintains a relentless inquisitiveness, ever collecting and connecting
data points to help guide the reader through complex socio-legal terrain.
Most
of the chapters could stand on their own as original accounts of one facet or
another of U.S. abortion controversies.
Chapter seven, on “Sending Pregnant Teenagers to Court,” advances an
especially powerful critique of judicial bypass hearings as cruel and
frequently arbitrary degradation ceremonies. But the main throughline of the book is its catalog
of the ways in which Sanger believes this country’s abortion discourse, or “abortion
talk,” has been lacking—and in consequence how abortion policymaking has been
lacking. Not in passion or commitment,
to be sure, but lacking in evidence, lacking in candor, and lacking in
appreciation and respect for the distinctive circumstances and perspectives of
women.
* * *
Secrecy
is a big part of this story. The book’s “central
argument,” Sanger writes in the preface, is that “the secrecy surrounding
women’s personal experience of abortion has massively . . . distorted how the
subject of abortion is discussed and how it is regulated.” These “distortions” take myriad forms. Politically, secrecy means that our debates about
abortion often paint a misleading picture, as by overstating its health risks
or understating its bases of support. Culturally,
secrecy means that abortion often gets coded as something shameful or deviant, which
reinforces the desire for concealment regarding abortion decisions, which in
turn reinforces the sense that there is something ignominious to be hidden
away, and on and on in a self-perpetuating cycle. And substantively, secrecy means that any
number of dubious, paternalistic, or factually erroneous claims about the harms
of abortion are able to circulate with less pushback than we might expect in a
more open conversational climate.
Abortion,
in other words, is in the closet.
Sanger
doesn’t expressly adopt this framing of abortion secrecy, although she draws an
analogy to sexual orientation “closetedness” in chapter two that suggests she
would be amenable to it. Closetedness,
as Sanger observes, refers to “a form of concealment that is both furtive and
debilitating,” set against a “shadow of disapproval.” We know from other contexts that such closets
are costly for inhabitants. They
stigmatize, they suffocate, they alienate, they create vulnerability, they
obscure reality. The abortion closet paradoxically
makes our society both more obsessed with abortion—because like all taboos, it
becomes an object of fascination and fear—and yet less familiar with abortion—because
many of our public debates about it are disconnected from women’s actual
experiences.
One
may wonder whether secrecy deserves such emphasis. Statistics on abortion are regularly compiled
and circulated. Many pro-choice women
have been vocal about their beliefs on abortion, pregnancy, procreation, and
related issues. Their views, however,
are liable to be discounted or discredited by competing discourses that
flourish alongside their own. The
problem here may have less to do with ignorance and “unknowing” than with a
refusal of empathy. It is not clear that
secret-keeping, of whatever sort, has been as central to the development of
abortion regulation as the closet historically has been to gay
subordination.
That
said, abortion secrecy is very real,
and underexplored, and my sense is that Sanger has opened up significant
conceptual and political opportunities in pointing to the abortion closet. The analogies and disanalogies to the gay
closet warrant sustained attention. Moreover,
if secrecy is at the core of Sanger’s diagnosis of what ails the American
discourse on abortion, the book also identifies a range of supplementary causes. One is the persistence of stark disparities
in the social roles and responsibilities of men versus women, with women
bearing not only most of the practical burden of raising children but also most
of the moral burden of responding to unwanted pregnancies. A number of newer developments that might
seem to enrich the conversation, meanwhile, only end up deepening the closet—from
the proliferation in popular culture of fetal images that foster an association
with personhood; to the proliferation of terminology, such as partial birth
abortion and unborn child, that gives pro-life advocates the “rhetorical advantage”;
to the proliferation of policies, such as mandatory ultrasounds and informed
consent protocols, that dictate what women see and hear in their physicians’
offices.
The
pro-life push to control the conversations that abortion providers have with
their patients, Sanger suggests, betrays an anxiety about frank dialogue. Proponents of Women’s Right to Know laws and
informed consent protocols recognize the importance of the discursive space;
their prescriptions generate a steady stream of abortion talk. Much of this talk, however, is scripted and
unidirectional. It purports to promote
more knowledgeable and responsible choices yet in reality serves to deter and
demean women and to interfere with their decisional processes.
* * *
Among
other contributions, Sanger’s subtle indictment of contemporary abortion discourse
sheds light on a classic subject in legal theory: the distinction between rules
and standards. Whereas rules are thought
to limit case-by-case discretion through crisp ex ante directives, standards
leave much of their content to be worked out by future enforcers and
interpreters. Rules are precise,
standards imprecise. Some legal theorists
have suggested that the very imprecision of standards ought to make them better
at facilitating moral and democratic deliberation. Rather than apply a rule by rote, citizens
faced with a standard are forced to think hard about whether they are acting
appropriately and why.
But
as Sanger shows, standards in abortion law may have just the opposite
effect. In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern
Pennsylvania v. Casey, the Supreme Court famously replaced Roe v. Wade’s trimester system with the “undue
burden” test to govern when abortion may be restricted. In so doing, the Court shifted the doctrinal
framework from a relatively rigid set of rules to a relatively hazy and
open-textured standard. On the rosy view
of standards as deliberation-forcing, Casey
should have led to richer public argument about the stakes involved in
terminating a pregnancy, in each trimester, and about whether any given
regulatory plan seems reasonable and respectful of women or alternatively
whether it seems excessive and unjustified.
Sanger,
however, suggests that the shift from Roe
to Casey occasioned no such
elevation of our deliberations about abortion, no salutary spur to collective
self-reflection. On the contrary, in her
telling, Casey largely enabled a diminishment of the quality and integrity
of these deliberations, as well as a diminishment of the abortion right. When you combine Casey’s malleable language of undue burden—a phrase that teeters on
the edge of tautology—with all the broader factors that threaten to “distort” abortion
talk and policy, it turns out that you invite endless cycles of opportunism and
obstruction, not sensitive and honest debate.
One
general lesson we might take from Sanger’s account, then, is that the
relationship between legal doctrine and cultural practice in such a politically
charged field may be poorly illuminated by abstract propositions about the comparative
merits of rules, standards, or the like.
Open-minded judges, in particular, might learn from Sanger’s implicit
yet emphatic demonstration of the need for more realistic, empirically
informed, and sociologically grounded approaches to abortion regulation.
* * *
Sanger
begins her book with “the possibility of conversation at a lower decibel by
women concerning their own abortion decisions and experience.” Less heat, more light, is her proposal. Less secrecy and shame, “more openness and
generosity,” as she puts it in the book’s closing line.
Sanger’s
book does not simply offer an eloquent brief in support of this proposal. The book also offers, through the author’s
own exemplary openness and generosity, a model of what such conversations about
abortion might be like. And what we find
is that they can be intensely illuminating.
This post is based on Pozen’s remarks at a recent event
celebrating the publication of About Abortion.
Posted 10:48 AM by David Pozen [link]
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers ![]() Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) ![]() David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) ![]() Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). ![]() Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) ![]() Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) ![]() Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) ![]() Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) ![]() Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) ![]() Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution ![]() Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) ![]() Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) ![]() Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) ![]() Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) ![]() Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic ![]() Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) ![]() David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) ![]() Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |