E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
One thing that's understandably been neglected in writing about the prospects of a unified Republican government with Trump as president is that we can expect the enactment of policies aimed, not at paying off supporters or fulfilling promises (or violating rights -- which may fall into either or both of those categories), but rather at weakening components of the Democratic coalition. The model is the project of defunding the left, which -- in its most interesting aspects -- didn't involve simply denying federal funds to things associated with the left but instead involved the adoption of "substantive" policies whose effect was as I've described. The most obvious recent examples are the attacks on class actions and class arbitration, whose effect, when successful, is to make plaintiff-side trial lawyers less able to support Democrats with campaign contributions. Friedrichs-type litigation and the promotion of charter schools are other examples. It might be helpful for people on "our" side to think about what other policies might have that effect, and begin to frame the discussion of those policies not (only) with reference to their wisdom as policy (or lack thereof), but with reference to their mostly intended political effects. (For the record, I don't think that defunding Planned Parenthood is an interesting example of how policies make politics in the sense I'm intending -- mostly because the interesting examples involve substantive policies rather than funding policies. But I'm open to persuasion, etc.)