Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Unfair Competition from Government: "Give me your Retired, your Sick, your Impoverished Masses"
A few hours ago CBS News broadcast an embarrassingly bad story about health reform. Worried that an "overhaul" would "hurt health care," correspondent Sharyl Atkisson strung together some quotes from a Cato Institute spokesman and spun a fable projecting that new regulations could force employers to drop coverage for their workers. (As if private insurers have no recourse in Washington if this starts happening.)
But the piece de resistance of obfuscation in the piece is even more egregious:
Today, Mr. Obama also scoffed at claims that a public plan would put private insurers out of business. "If private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality of health care, if they tell us that they are offering a good deal, then why is that the government, which they say can't run anything, is suddenly going to drive them out of business?" Mr. Obama asked.
The answer, critics say, is that the government has many tools to get an unfair advantage and undercut private companies. "The government can subsidize its plan with tax revenue from other taxpayers," said [Michael] Cannon [of the Cato Institute]. "The government can enact regulations that favor its plan over other private insurers."
To see the absurdity of such rhetoric, imagine we are starting from scratch, and government officials running Medicare and Medicaid and state uncompensated care pools get together with private insurers. The government officials say: "We're taking over responsibility for all the elderly, whose health care costs are generally much higher than average. We'll also take on a large proportion of the poor. We're leaving you the best customers--those who are relatively young, and employed. But hey, we'll also pay you far more than we pay our own bureaucracy for taking on some of the Medicare population, too."
That, in actuality, is the scary government's opening negotiating position. And we're really worried that it's going to push private insurance plans against the wall? Health care costs are highly concentrated among a small portion of the population. As AHRQ notes, "Half of the population spends little or nothing on health care, while 5 percent of the population spends almost half of the total amount." Government is already taking on a great deal of responsibility for that care, and it alone has the purchasing power to control costs.
About the only way you can say that a public plan must be stopped because it will kill off private insurance is if you believe that something like Dick Cheney's "One Percent Doctrine" applies to health care finance. Of course, the fearmongering worked in the case of Iraq. And if it works again in health care, it'll probably have the same results for our fiscal situation as the three trillion dollar war.