Monday, December 19, 2005

Definition of "Audacity"

Marty Lederman

Noun: Bold or insolent heedlessness of restraints, as of those imposed by prudence, propriety, or convention.

As I explain below, the Administration's principal justification for its stark violation of FISA is the claim that Congress authorized the surveillance in question -- the circumvention of FISA's finely wrought scheme -- when, on September 18, 2004, it enacted the AUMF authorizing the President to take "necessary and appropriate force" against those reponsible for the 9/11 attacks. I suggested that this didn't pass the laugh test -- that it is simply inconceviable that any member of Congress, let alone a majority, intended by voting for the AUMF to allow circumvention of the FISA-court approval mechanism as to the wiretapping of communications involving U.S. persons. (If the AUMF had authorized such interceptions, why did the Administration seek and receive amendments to FISA in the PATRIOT Act? Why, in 2003, did the Justice Department draft further amendments to FISA -- including to section 1802 in particular -- without mentioned the surgery that had been performed by the AUMF, and why in that draft is the "U.S. person" limitation accurately described as if it had not been amended?)

But the Attorney General's press conference today makes it clear that that's their story, and they're sticking to it. The odd thing, of course, is that the Administration specifically went to Congress with a package of statutory authorities -- many related to wiretaps and surveillance -- that it thought were necessary to fight the battle against Al Qaeda. It was called the PATRIOT Act. Therefore, it's understandable that two reporters at today's conference asked the AG why they didn't simply ask Congress for a simple amendment to FISA, if this eavesdropping authority was as critical as the Administration now claims.

First, Gonzales is asked why, if this authority is so important, they didn't just "address that issue and fix it," i.e., through statutory amendment, rather than taking the "backdoor approach" [of pretending that it had already been authorized]. Here's his response:

"This is not a backdoor approach. We believe Congress has authorized this kind of surveillance. We have had discussions with Congress in the past -- certain members of Congress -- as to whether or not FISA could be amended to allow us to adequately deal with this kind of threat, and we were advised that that would be difficult, if not impossible."

Did you catch that? It's a two-part answer: (1) Congress has authorized the circumvention of FISA (in the AUMF); and (ii) We didn't ask Congress for an amendment to FISA because we were informed they would have denied it.

And then there's this exchange, in which the answers are inverted (1. We couldn't have gotten congressional authorization; 2. In any event, we got congressional authorization):

Q If FISA didn't work, why didn't you seek a new statute that allowed something like this legally?

ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALES: That question was asked earlier. We've had discussions with members of Congress, certain members of Congress, about whether or not we could get an amendment to FISA, and we were advised that that was not likely to be -- that was not something we could likely get, certainly not without jeopardizing the existence of the program, and therefore, killing the program. And that -- and so a decision was made that because we felt that the authorities were there, that we should continue moving forward with this program.

The interesting question now, of course, is whether Congress will permit itself to be treated with such contempt.


The best discussion of Lincoln's constitutional thought I've seen is "Lincoln's Constitution," by Daniel Farber. My impression from that book is that Lincoln was a good deal more respectful of constitutional and Congressional authority than Bush/Gonzales are. Far from overriding settled law when it was inconvenient, Lincoln acknowledged that ultimately Congressional authority was required for constitutionally controversial emergency actions.

My other impression is that the Civil War was a far more existential threat to the United States than the current perma-yellow-alert emergency is.

As to Goebbels and German immigrants: if there had been settled law against wiretaps of this sort, that should have been serious back then too. I seem to recall other actions against Americans of foreign extraction back then that most Americans are ashamed of today.

Assumedly there was aquessance in their silence.

Briefings aren't acquiescence. Say I bind and gag you and then 'brief' you that I'm about to rob your house. Later I tell the court "he didn't object." I guess you'd be pulling your chin saying "hmm, guy's got a point."

I think opposition party congressmen and women can't just run around blabbing about whatever they hear at an intelligence briefing. All they can do -- the few who even hear about the program, that is -- is object directly to the administration. Jay Rockefeller wrote a letter to Cheney doing just that, expressing strong reservations that were anything but acquiescence.

Briefings aren't acquiescence. Say I bind and gag you and then 'brief' you that I'm about to rob your house. Later I tell the court "he didn't object." I guess you'd be pulling your chin saying "hmm, guy's got a point."

The representatives were far from bound and gagged. They definitely had other means of investigation and oversite by means of the Intelligence committees. Those venues are already within a classified realm and can discuss such issues. If they then deemed the presidents activities as illegal, they then could tell him so and take further action as neccessary. Which include court actions if deemed appropriate.

Rockefeller's single letter is far from performing his due diligence in this. He most certainly could have brought this up in committee and forced the issue if he chose to.

And note, other Senators, of both parties, made similar statements and still did nothing. They all should be given a portion of the blame for failure to do anything beyond the most meager of protests.

They definitely had other means of investigation and oversite by means of the Intelligence committees.

Yeah, right. Bush has said it was "shameful" to reveal the existence of this unapproved, illegal program. The Senate and the House are both run by party-line partisans who have to shamed (and what an iffy proposition that was) into keeping their own promise to follow up on the pre-war politicization of intelligence. Oops, make that 'promising to keep their own promise.'

You know that you'd be supporting Bush and the Republicans to the hilt if Rockefeller had come out saying anything he was sworn not to.

There wasn't oversight, there was the arm-twisted appearance of oversight. And you know it.

I certainly have a problem with the president having carte blanche authority to surveil American's in search of foreign intelligence, but it seems that there is in fact some legal basis this view.

It seems that there are actually quite a few federal cases that say that the President has the "inherent authority" to wiretap without a warrant in order to gain foreign intelligence. In particular, there seems to be a 2002 case, In Re Sealed Case 310 F.3d 717, which explicitly states this. I this case, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review determined that the President had “inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches to obtain foreign intelligence information,” and that so long as the only real use of a FISA warrant is to be later able to use that information in a criminal prosecution. This authority apparently comes from the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief. and therefore Congress had no power to restrict this authority through FISA or any other means short of proposing a Constitutional Amendment.

I am more than willing to have someone tell me that I am wrong here, in fact, I wish someone would, but it seems to me that this was within the law.

Thanks for the info, maybe I can use this ended my tufted marketing and I've been use untold anulus media in run a interaction and they someone existing a big amend on me.
herbal paket hamil
Herbal Paket kista
Herbal paket langsing

Most of the time I don’t make comments on websites, but I'd like to say that this article really forced me to do so. Really nice post! Actual Pr backlinks
cara mengobati keputihan
penyebab bau tak sedap
ciri-ciri distributor asli PT. Natural Nusantara

Seiring dengan perkembangan jaman sekarang banyak sekali obat- obatan modern yang berasal dari bahan kimia seperti contohnya mercuri sebagai bahan dasar tersebut dengan tujuan , agar konsumen bisa mendapatkan hasil yang maksimal dengan cara proses yang instan. Konsumen tidak sadar bahwa bahan-bahan kimia sangat berbaya bagi kesehatan tubuh kita alam jangka panjang. Selain prosesnya yang instan tentu saja harganya yang relatif murah dibandingkan dengan produk kecantikan berbahan dasar alami.

On this occasion I will explain Apa Itu Manfaat Payudara Kecil Wanita and Bagaimana Cara Memperbesar Ukuran Payudara..? payudara kecil actually very beneficial for women because women can be members freedom to perform various kegitana without having to feel uncomfortable because the breasts are rubbed or touched. Also in the field of women's fashion can benefit because they can wear almost all kinds of clothes and bra. But if you want to add a little or a lot ukurang breast. We can do a Olahraga Untuk besarkan Payudara such as push-ups, pull-ups, etc. In addition you can also use Ayla Breast Care Untuk Besarkan Payudara , This cream can accelerate the growth of the breast becomes firmer and larger. This method can NDA combine.
Apart from the appearance of the inside of the course should be treated not the True Way Vaginal care is crucial for intimate areas are not attacked by diseases such as vaginal discharge, itching "and odor. Even Kanker Serviks . But no need to panic now Cara Mencagah Kanker Serviks already available. Such foods do routine maintenance and using Crystal X . Manfaat Crystal X Atasi Keputihan and cervical cancer has been proven in addition to the Efek Samping Crystal X a positive effect, namely the effect penyemubuhan. Thus and thanks


I've been browsing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all website owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.
Crystal X Merapatkan Vagina
Jual Crystal X Obat Keputihan
Crystal X Asli Obat keputihan Herbal
Crystal X Merawat Miss V
Crystal X Obat Miom dan Kista
Mengatasi keputihan
Crystal X cara agar Cepat hamil
Moreskin Skin Care
Collaskin collagen NASA


Eyes speak the best of the body language.
Agen Judi Online Terpercaya

Post a Comment

Older Posts
Newer Posts