E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Would Trump's Chances of Re-election be Substantially Reduced If He Chose Ivanka to be his Running Mate?
Ian Ayres
It is difficult to predict how alternative VPs would play in the swing states that are likely to determine the election (all the more now that it is less clear who the Democratic opponents will be). Beyond crude voter demographic preferences, some of the electorate might believe that Ivanka as Veep could usefully moderate some of her father's excesses.
But as long as the likelihood of Trump's re-election would not decline too precipitously, there is an argument that choosing his eldest child would further Trump's interests. Even if Ivanka hurt his chances, Trump might figure he has enough of a lead that he can still win with her on the ticket.
And if she were elected as vice-president, it would of course set her up to run for president in 2028, which would cheer Trump's base (just as some Obama supporters would welcome his spouse throwing her hat into the ring). They might believe that President Ivanka Trump would let her father usefully influence her policy decisions after he was constitutionally disabled from running again.
And if Trump has dynastic ambitions, it might be that he deems Ivanka, for whom he has a special affection, to be his most worthy successor. Or to paraphrase Sucession, he might consider her to be the most serious person among his offspring.
Dynastic presidential succession is suspect -- as the unsuccessful presidencies of John Quincy Adams, Benjamin Harrison, and George W. Bush have tended to demonstrate. And it will strike some voters that having a close relative as your running mate is deeply repugnant to our Constitutional tradition. Akhil Amar has pointed out that George Washington was father of our country in part because he did not have children of his own (and hence would have less temptation to instigate their succession). Then again Robert Kennedy was confirmed as attorney general and thereby placed in the presidential line of succession during his brother's term.
Ivanka, who has chosen to step away from the "dark world" of politics, might not be interested in such a position. This post is not about her or my preferences or what is best for our nation, but instead asks whether picking Ivanka might best serve Trump's interests.
In any event, it seems clear to me that Trump would have a second-mover advantage in waiting until the Democratic ticket is solidified before choosing his running mate -- as waiting might give him an opportunity to choose a vice-president that beneficially responds to his opponents.