E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
The Nixon Tapes Case at 50: Why Judge Cannon Was Wrong to Reject the Supreme Court's Statutory Holding
Marty Lederman
Over on Just Security, I've published a deep dive into the statutory question that prompted Judge Aileen Cannon to dismiss the indictment against Donald Trump in the Mar-a-Lago documents case. Despite the way Judge Cannon's decision has been advertised, it really has little to do with the Appointments Clause or any other constitutional issue. The only real dispute is whether Congress has vested the Attorney General with statutory authority to hire someone from outside DOJ to handle a criminal investigation and prosecution.
As the Supreme Court held 50 years ago today--with respect to Acting AG Robert Bork's appointment of Leon Jaworski as Special Watergate Prosecutor--the plain answer to that question is "yes." In my post, I explain why that answer was right--indeed, so clear that both Nixon's savvy counsel and Oliver North's, fourteen years later, concluded that it wasn't even worth raising.
My post is very detailed (it even has a bunch of footnotes, for those of you who can't resist getting into the weeds!), but the basics are quite straightforward:
Congress has vested the Attorney General with (i) the authority to control criminal investigations and prosecutions; (ii) the authority to delegate those functions to other DOJ actors; and (iii) the authority to hire persons from outside DOJ to work at the Department. Ergo, Attorney General Garland was statutorily authorized to hire Jack Smith to work at DOJ specifically for the purpose of supervising the Mar-a-Lago and January 6 cases.