E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
1. The constitutional disqualification of government officials who violated their oath of office was central to the Fourteenth Amendment’s goal of ensuring government by persons who could be trusted to be faithful to the Constitution.
2. With one notable exception, Americans during the 1860s regarded Section Three as self-executing.
3. Section Three when framed was thought to be an additional qualification for officeholding and not a punishment for crime.
4. Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to bar from office any past or present state or federal officeholder who engaged in an insurrection, not just persons who participated in what members of the Thirty-Ninth Congress referred to as “the late rebellion.”
5. The persons who framed Section Three thought presidents of the United States are officers of the United States who are disqualified from holding future federal or state offices if they engage in an insurrection after or while holding office.
6. The persons who framed Section Three thought that presidency of the United States was among the offices under the United States that past and present officeholders who participation in insurrections were disqualified from holding.
7. An insurrection at the time Section Three was framed consisted of two or more persons resisting the implementation of any law by force, violence and intimidation for a public purpose and was not limited to rebellious attempts to overthrow the government.
8. The events of January 6, 2021 are consistent with the legal understanding of insurrection in 1866.
9. Constitutional authorities before, during and immediately after the Civil War maintained that any person who knowingly contributed to an insurrection as having engaged in the insurrection, even if that person did not personally commit an act of violence or were far from the scene of the violence, force, and intimidation.
10. If the allegations made by the Final Report of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol are true, Donald Trump participated in the insurrection that took place on January 6, 2021.