E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
John Bingham Explaining That Jefferson Davis Was Ineligible to be President
Gerard N. Magliocca
One issue in the current Section Three debate is whether the presidency is an "office . . . under the United States" subject to disqualification. A point that I made in my original Section Three article was that the presidency must be covered, because to say otherwise would mean that Jefferson Davis was ineligible for every office except the highest one. More research has followed from John Vlahoplus confirming that Americans in that era thought that Jefferson Davis was ineligible for the presidency.
I've found a speech by John Bingham in 1872 that provides additional evidence. By way of background, the Democratic Platform in that year argued for "universal amnesty" for all ex-Confederates and was a cause championed by Horace Greeley, the Democratic presidential candidate. Bingham gave a campaign speech in July1872 and pointed out that Congress recently gave to amnesty to most ex-Confederates:
"Why, then, do these gentlemen talk about general amnesty? Is the Republican Party to be stricken down unless Jefferson Davis is made eligible to be the Democratic candidate for President of the United States next after Horace Greeley? [Laughter] That is all there is left to this amnesty question."
Later in that paragraph, Bingham said:
"All disabilities, I repeat, are removed, except from such persons as Jefferson Davis and a few others like him. I don't know that the country will suffer if they are never relieved from their disabilities. I don't know that it is essential to the safety of the Republic, or to the equal rights of any of the citizens of this Union, that Jefferson Davis, or Beauregard, or any man of that character who bore the commissions of the United States, and were bound by oaths to support the Constitution of the United States, and committed treason against the United States, should ever hereafter be permitted to be either President or Governor, Senator or Representative."
I added the italics for clarity's sake and will find a way to make entire speech available if I can.
UPDATE: The speech was made in Ohio can be found in The Tiffin Tribuneon July 18, 1872.