E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Three years ago, I wrote a post here entitled "Will Andrew Cuomo Have to Pardon Donald Trump?" Of course, New York now has a different Governor, but the question remains. Here is part of what I said then:
What happens if Donald Trump is prosecuted in New York next year (or five years from now) when he is no longer President?
Go and read President Ford's speech defending his pardon of Richard Nixon. Here is a key section:
[A] former President of the United States, instead of enjoying equal treatment with any other citizen accused of violating the law, would be cruelly and excessively penalized either in preserving the presumption of his innocence or in obtaining a speedy determination of his guilt in order to repay a legal debt to society. During this long period of delay and potential litigation, ugly passions would again be aroused. And our people would again be polarized in their opinions. And the credibility of our free institutions of government would again be challenged at home and abroad.
Of course, no President can pardon someone for state criminal charges. Only that state's Governor can do that.
Governor Hochul is not in the same position as President Ford was in 1974. One of Ford's concerns was that a trial of Richard Nixon would make it much harder for him to serve as an effective President. The Trump case, by contrast, will have no impact on Governor Hochul's effectiveness. The question for her is simply whether a pardon is in the best interests of the country.
One way to think about that question is through the longstanding tradition (in Britain and the United States) of giving someone a pardon or commutation after a conviction. The conviction vindicates the rule of law, but the pardon or commutation recognizes that there are other important interests at stake. In this case, though, you might say that the trial itself is the problem that a pardon should address.
I don't know what the right answer is here, but Governor Hochul and (perhaps) Governor Kemp may face this dilemma soon