Balkinization  

Monday, September 26, 2022

90% of Legitimacy Is Just Showing Up

Gerard N. Magliocca

The legitimacy of the Supreme Court is often raised as a concern following controversial or unpopular decisions. Dobbs is the latest example, with sitting Justices murmuring about the issue and commentators saying the quiet part out loud. To my mind, this chatter is just hyperbole. There is a simple test for the Court's legitimacy: Do litigants stop participating in Supreme Court cases?

Take the affirmative action cases that will be heard next month. Suppose Harvard refused to file a brief and boycotted the oral argument. "The fix is in," Harvard might say, "and we refuse to dignify this sham hearing through our presence." Of course, Harvard is not doing that and never gave the idea any thought. Nor have any commentators. This is what you might call a revealed preference that the Court is legitimate and that no serious person thinks otherwise.

Now there are famous examples of Supreme Court boycotts. Marbury v. Madison is one and Worcester v. Georgia is another. In both instances, there was a serious view that the Court was not legitimate (at least in part) that the Justices formally ignored but informally acknowledged in denying an effective remedy to the party that showed up and won. (Today one wonders if the Court would appoint an amicus curiae to argue somebody like Madison's position rather than leave counsel's chair vacant.) We are nowhere close to that.


Comments:

Post a Comment

Older Posts
Newer Posts
Home