E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Colbert and Diversity Changes to the ABA's Standards and Rules
Jason Mazzone
Every fair-minded person who heard the recording of the meeting between the Yale Law School diversity administrators and Trent Colbert over his Constitution Day invitation has concluded that something was seriously amiss in the way the administrators handled the incident. Indeed, the administrators’ views and urgings are so astonishing that without the recording it would be hard to believe the meeting even happened in the way it did.
However things now shake out at Yale (an assessment is underway), there is a larger concern: it’s quite possible that the Colbert meeting represents standard practice on the part of diversity administrators every day in law schools (and universities more generally) around the country. One of the many striking aspects of the recording is that the YLS administrators offer their diagnoses and cures with a degree of certainty that comes only with regular training and frequent practice. It’s difficult to imagine this was all a one-time slip.
The ABA should pay attention.
It’s surely time to hit pause on the diversity-related changes to the Standards and Rules that the ABA’s Section of Legal Education and Admissions has recommended. Those changes, recall, include a requirement that law schools provide all students with education on “bias, crosscultural competency, and racism;” a mandate that all law students “participate in a substantial activity designed to reinforce the skill of cultural competency and their obligation as future lawyers to work to eliminate racism in the legal profession;” and a specification that “among the values” that (required) professional responsibility courses must teach are “the importance of cross-cultural competency to professionally responsible representation and the obligation of lawyers to promote a justice system that provides equal access and eliminates bias, discrimination, and racism in the law.”
In light of the Colbert incident and the risk that it is representative rather than aberrational, these proposed changes to the Standards and Rules are surely fuel for fire. Entirely absent from the proposed changes are mechanisms to guard against law students, educationally primed to identify biases, cross-cultural incompetencies and racism, from rushing to report to administrators the adjudged sins of their peers and professors and to demand outsize redress. Worse yet, tying anti-racism to professional identity and obligation makes certain consequences of the kind the YLS administrators (reminding Colbert he will be applying for admission to the bar) only insinuated.
The best critique of the proposed diversity changes to the ABA’s Standards and Rules remains the letter, last June, from ten Yale faculty members. They knew—and know—what they were talking about.