E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
In our discussions of Supreme Court Justices over the years, Sandy Levinson and I have adopted a rough division. Some justices who would not be very much remembered if they had never been appointed to the Supreme Court. Their primary achievement was that they sat on the Court, and their greatness, to the extent they are great, comes primarily from what they did while they were there.
A second group of Justices led noteworthy lives before they became Supreme Court Justices, and you could easily imagine someone writing a biography about them even if they had never been appointed to the Court. Indeed, one reason why they were appointed is because of their remarkable achievements.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg falls into the second category. Even had she never been appointed to the Supreme Court, she would have been an important figure in the second wave of American feminism, and a crucial figure in the modern legal campaign for women's rights. The obstacles she had to overcome would have been just as great, and her overcoming of those obstacles would have been just as inspiring. One could easily imagine a biography written about such a remarkable person and her remarkable life.
Lest I be misunderstood, let me hasten to add that her work on the Supreme Court was significant too. Her presence on the Court was important to American law in myriad ways. Her opinion in U.S. v. Virginia, and her dissent in Shelby County will still be read many years from now. And her status as a Supreme Court Justice certainly amplified her public influence so that, by the time of her death, she had become a beloved icon in popular culture. She also mentored many devoted law clerks, who have, and will continue to have, an important impact on the law. But make no mistake: Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a hero even before President Clinton appointed her to the Supreme Court. It is just that fewer people would have known about it.