Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Supreme Court Justices as Leakers
|
Wednesday, July 29, 2020
Supreme Court Justices as Leakers
Gerard N. Magliocca
Sir Humphrey Appleby once explained that "the ship of state is the only ship that leaks from the top." The same is true in the Supreme Court. Joan Biskupic's "inside" stories on CNN about the recently completed Term probably came from one or more of the Justices. This is not unprecedented. There were Justices who talked to Bob Woodward for The Brethren. There were Justices who leaked in the 1940s during the Jewell Ridge controversy. And so on.
Comments:
Biskupic's after action stories are 90% speculation of legal observers with some tidbits which appear to be gleaned from a clerk. There does not appear to be an attempt by one or more justices to influence another during proceedings.
Roberts is plainly an establishment political animal who attempts to conform case results to the polls. The DACA case was a perfect example. DACA kids poll well. Illegal aliens, coyotes and Hispanic gang bangers do not. By finding a technicality upon which to reverse the DACA rule without welding the EPC club Sotomayor preferred, Roberts made the decision match the polls. Rather than suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome as suggested by Biskupic and others in the Democrat media, I suspect Roberts may see himself as protecting Trump against his instincts which do not poll well. The speculation Roberts (playing the new Kennedy and O'Connor) was the reason why the actual conservatives have declined to accept new 2A cases has been floating around conservative circles for years. I suspect the conservatives took a chance on the NYC case because the facts were so egregious that even Roberts would cry foul. They were wrong. Roberts found a way to dispose of the case without ruling on politically problematic issues like whether the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right requiring strict scrutiny of firearm prohibitions. There is not a chance in hell Roberts will vote to overturn the outlaw Roe decision. Those of us who prefer applying the law rather than the polls need to reelect Trump and hope he appoints a genuine conservative to replace Ginsberg and make five.
Important issue. We can't really know, from the related article of Biskup, that judges leak or have leaked something here (or generally speaking).
By the way, one may reach the article here: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/27/politics/john-roberts-supreme-court-liberals-daca-second-amendment/index.html Leaking, is bad. Fundamental principles are violated so. First, integrity. When one judge leaks, the public trust is eroded. Such judge, must be perceived as having back mind. Illicit one. He tries, to reach certain goal, not through direct confrontation, but, through manipulation of the media or whatever. This is not professional and ethical behavior, expected from one judge. Second, impartiality: If one judge, leaks something concerning a case pending, then, the same issue is raised: Why to leak, instead of confronting the problem in honest and sincere manner ? Also, and surly in the Supreme court, team cooperation is needed and expected. How shall one justice trust the other then? They leak instead of talking and solving disagreements. They leak and manipulate, instead of putting things straightforward on the table. All this, erodes, the public trust, in the system. System that must serve as ultimate example for integrity. Thanks
I think the times basically will lead to more leaks of this nature, justices in general more likely to express themselves publicly and interact with a variety of at times partisan actors. Overall, at least after the term is over like this, I think the whole thing is acceptable. I wasn't really surprised at what was said though some details might be unclear. The series does seem a bit more detailed, right after the term is over, than usual. OTOH, we have had books since "The Brethren" that provided comparable inside details.
Joan Biskupic is basically a quasi-official biographer with a long respectable pedigree. So, I think Roberts -- if likely not loving the whole thing -- accepts what she is doing. I think Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, one or the other at least, actively are of the sort who would work with her. Or, not mind if their clerks did so. The pieces on them, especially Kavanaugh, put them in a good light as reasonable sorts. They might not be seen as favorably by High Federalists, but touching upon something said, they very well might want to defend themselves there too. Anyway, they are mostly loyal, the Kavanaugh piece mostly saying his concern is "tone."
Those of us who prefer applying the law rather than the polls need to reelect Trump and hope he appoints a genuine conservative to replace Ginsberg and make five.
# posted by Blogger Bart DePalma : 2:57 PM The way things are going you're going to have to move to Russia and vote for Putin directly.
el roam:
I would agree with you if there was evidence justices were leaking to apply pressure on colleagues to change positions during proceedings. The only recent major change of position was Roberts defecting to save Obamacare and no one outside had a clue until reports after the fact.
Bart Depalma, as written by me, no proof at first place, of any leaking. And it is bad, not only because of pressure on colleagues, but:
It may be perceived, as manipulation. A judge, and manipulation of the media, well, that is like Christ v. Anti Christ. A judge, should even avoid being interviewed. Nothing at all. Thanks
1. It's very hard to confirm the things Biskupic claims. I have heard from someone who would have reason to know that her earlier stories on the NFIB v. Sibelius deliberations got things completely wrong.
Post a Comment
2. This, in the end, is all very unimportant and kind of damaging. The legal system runs on confidences. I am sure, for instance, that the public would be very interested in the advice that Johnny Depp or Amber Heard's lawyers are giving to their respective clients. But if people thought that those communications would become public, it would seriously interfere with the ability of people to get legal representation. Similarly, courts work by forming consensus. (A related point- forming consensus is actually 500 times more important than all the BS judicial philosophies that get debated, whether it is conservatives' "originalism" or liberals' "active liberty". A majority of the judges and justices trumps judicial philosophies every time.) You know how you make it impossible to form consensus? Do it in public. This is why cases settle in private mediations and not through public negotiations. People posture in public, and they react to publicity by trying to make themselves look good to whoever they are trying to please. Which is just anathema to what panels of judges are supposed to be doing. There's a whole bunch of people out there who aren't lawyers and who don't actually give a crap about how the judicial system actually works, and they cheer this stuff. It's terrible. You simply do not need to know one-sided accounts of private judicial deliberations.
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |