Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts A discussion about the Senate.
|
Monday, March 16, 2020
A discussion about the Senate.
Sandy Levinson
I participated Saturday morning in an online discussion of the U.S. Senate. It was originally supposed to take place in person at the national Federalist Society Student Conference in Ann Arbor that was cancelled. The discussants were my colleague Lynn Baker; University of California Prof. John Yoo; and Amanda Neely, who works for Ohio Senator Rob Portman at the Senate itself. The moderator was Federal Judge Raymond Kethledge. Lynn and I both directed our fire at the allocation of equal voting power, whereas John and Amanda focused more on the purported advantages of bicameralism and the desirability of moving toward a more limited national government. I thought it was an interesting (and civil) discussion. The link begins about a minute or so before we actually got going, so just bear with it. The entire panel lasted about an hour and forty-five minutes or so. I suspect that few readers will actually want to listen to the whole thing, but I hope that anyone actually offering comments will have done so.
Comments:
I just want to point out this excellent letter to the editor:
To the Editor: In his enthusiastic review of Ezra Klein’s “Why We’re Polarized” (Feb. 9), Norman J. Ornstein, like Klein, dances around the all-important issue of how we might attain badly needed constitutional reform. After laying out the egregious realities of the formal political system established by the Constitution, most obviously the Electoral College and the Senate, Ornstein writes that “at some point, the fundamental legitimacy of the system will be challenged.” Why hasn’t that point been reached already, given the practical reality that a minority of the voting population controls the Senate, the White House and, therefore, the federal judiciary? More to the point, neither Ornstein nor Klein addresses the fact that the Constitution is inordinately hard to amend, so that the only practical way, say, to address the present role of the Senate is through a constitutional convention, most certainly not by expecting the existing senators to ask serious questions about their bloated powers. Ornstein concludes by expressing his “fear” that a “long and torturous” road lies ahead of us. Perhaps we should recognize, more accurately, that we’re already about to careen over a cliff and that the Constitution basically leaves us without brakes. Sanford Levinson Austin, Texas The writer is a professor of government at the University of Texas, Austin, and co-author of “Fault Lines in the Constitution.” https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/books/review/letters-to-the-editor.html
Sandy:
The Senate is not "affirmative action" for two reasons: (1) the Senate divide power equally among sovereign states, while the EC is a hybrid, dividing proportional power in winner take all states, and (2) when combined with a House based on proportional representation, the Senate and Electoral College represent a check, not an independent source of power over others. Election of our bicameral Congress and POTUS are designed to promote supermajority rule. That being said, the Senate lost any pretense of deferring to state power (federalism) with the advent of the 17A, progressive centralized power and a bipartisan political class dedicated to maintaining their exercise of that power. I found your passing note of support for bicameralism to be interesting. I always thought you wanted a unicameral parliament. What type of bicameral Congress do you support?
It's fair enough to say that, but as noted, few will listen to an hour and forty five minute discussion. If that is your desire, it is perhaps best for this time just to flag the conversation without comments. You can set up another open-thread to comment on something noted there or perhaps to discuss the general question.
Thanks for posting the letter. I again will note that the Constitution itself did come about via convention and it was aided by the Articles not being there for that long. Among other things. And, they then made it easier to ratify. Another major changing point occurred during the Reconstruction, which also was a special situation. There were some changes during the 20th Century of note though many are tweaks and others, also, came at special moments (the 22A or the 26A, particularly). The watered down 23A involving D.C. is an example of the limited results.
I'd like to endorse Joe's suggestion: If you've got some source material you want people to look at before commenting, I'm fine with that. Post something about it without comments activated, and go with a second post permitting comments a few days later. The capacity to comment times out here fairly quickly to expect people to study before commenting.
Bircher Bart's two points don't in any way address Sandy's point that the Senate is geographic affirmative action (a la Lani Gunier). Exactly what affirmative action does is provide 'plus factor' points to the already existing base of qualifications. Thus, affirmative action may give plus points to a student whose SAT scores (the House in this analogy) are low.
"That being said, the Senate lost any pretense of deferring to state power (federalism) with the advent of the 17A, progressive centralized power and a bipartisan political class dedicated to maintaining their exercise of that power." This is especially laughable. Bircher Bart laments that the 17th Amendment empowered a 'bipartisan political class' by putting the vote in the hands of the people instead of...a bipartisan political class!'
Mr. W:
Sovereign states requiring equal representation in a union of states is hardly unheard of. See the UN and NATO. Nothing says a representative democracy must be based on population rather than political state or geography. By definition, there is no "affirmative action" in a system of equal representation.
Affirmative action is to add an additional criteria to others.
So an applicant's race or geography may add to the additional criteria of test scores or GPA. Democratic criteria involves majorities. A system which adds an additional criteria like 'where geographically the majority comes from' is the definition of affirmative action.
Mr. W: Affirmative action is to add an additional criteria to others. So an applicant's race or geography may add to the additional criteria of test scores or GPA.
I suppose "additional criteria" is one way of referring to a system which favor an applicant based on race and/or gender in a selection which is supposed to be based on merit. "Affirmative action" in a system of equal representation in a union of sovereign states would be the Security Council at the UN, granting additional powers to a subset of states. Democratic criteria involves majorities. True. In the case of equal representation of states, a majority of states generally rules.
Affirmative action would be adding extra representation for a delegation just because it's from a certain geographical/political unit.
Mista Whiskas said...Affirmative action would be adding extra representation for a delegation just because it's from a certain geographical/political unit.
Every state has equal representation in the Senate.
Giving sparsely populated Wyoming equal representation to California is the epitome of affirmative action.
Hello everyone i am Mudaf Kyle from MALARIA , i am here to give my testimony about a great Best Herbal Penis Enlargement Medicine called Dr OLU, I was heartbroken and disappointed because i had very small penis, not big enough to satisfy or pregnant a woman, i have been in so many relationship, but cut off because of my small penis situation, i have used so many product,drugs,vaccines,herbs which doctors prescribe for me, but none could offer me the help i searched for. one faithful day i saw some few comments on the internet about how this great specialist called Dr OLU has been helping men enlarge their penis size ,pregnant woman and last longer in bed and i decided to email him on his email i saw on the internet,(drolusolutionhome@gmail.com) or you can also WhatasApp him number +2348140654426so I decided to give his herbal product a try. i emailed him and he got back to me, he gave me some comforting words and steps to follow which i did with his herbal pills for Penis Enlargement, Within 1 week of it, i began to feel the enlargement of my penis, " and now it just 1 weeks of using his products my penis is about 10.5 inches longer in erection , and i had to settle out with my Ex girlfriend Stephanie, i was surprised when she opened her mouth and said that i almost killed her and she is satisfied with my sex and i have got a very Big penis now.
Post a Comment
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |