E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Sixth Annual Book Review Issue of Tulsa Law Review Now Available
Linda McClain
Ken
Kersch and I are pleased to announce the publication of the sixth annual book review issue of the Tulsa Law
Review (Volume 51, Issue 2) and our third co-edited issue. Since
Sandy Levinson and Mark Graber passed the baton to us in the fall of 2012, we have
endeavored to carry forward the interdisciplinary conversation that they
envisioned. As in our two prior co-edited issues, both the books under review
and reviewers in this issue come from an array of disciplinary backgrounds—law, political
science, history, philosophy, and anthropology. When possible, we have carried on the practice of grouping books for review together when they address
similar problems or different problems that speak to each other in interesting
ways. In this issue, twenty-six reviewers evaluate forty-six books. The subject
matter of these books is diverse, ranging from historical topics, such as the
impact of royalist thought on the American revolution and the dynamics of
Progressive-era state-building, to present-day issues such as the social
construction of race and controversies over regulating hate crimes in
cyberspace. The books reviewed here also reach beyond national borders, both in
focusing, within the U.S., on state constitutions and state courts, and, beyond
the U.S., on comparative constitutional law, international courts, and global
migration. We are delighted that Sandy has
contributed a characteristically thought-provoking essay on three
recent books about Lincoln. Following Sandy and Mark’s example of rotation in
office after a term of co-editing three issues, we are pleased to announce that the new
editors of the Tulsa Law Review,
beginning with Volume 52, are Professors Stuart Chinn, of the University of
Oregon, and Julie Novkov, of Albany University, SUNY. Both Professors Chinn and Novkov are dually trained in law and political science and share a commitment to interdisciplinary
exchange and the importance of publishing and reviewing scholarly books. We are
confident that the annual book review issue will flourish under their
co-editorship.