E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
One of the interesting features of Justice Alito's dissent in Obergefell is that it shows how social and religious conservatives are rethinking freedom of speech in the light of the next phase of the culture wars. In the last three decades many social and religious conservatives have been strong defenders of freedom of speech against "political correctness" on the left. But consider how widespread acceptance of gay rights is quietly reshaping their judgments about what freedom of speech means.
Social and religious conservatives have already been arguing--and will continue to argue--that others should not call them discriminators, much less bigots, because they refuse
to accept same-sex marriage or gay equality. Perhaps more important, social conservatives are starting to claim that they are being silenced (and therefore censored) by the larger secular community. Justice Alito explains:
Today’s
decision usurps the constitutional right of the people to decide whether
to keep or alter the traditional understanding of marriage. The
decision will also have other important consequences.It will be used to
vilify Americans who are unwilling to assent to the new orthodoxy. In
the course of its opinion,the majority compares traditional marriage
laws to laws that denied equal treatment for African-Americans and
women. E.g., ante, at 11–13. The implications of this analogy will be
exploited by those who are determined to stamp out every vestige of
dissent.
Perhaps recognizing how its reasoning may be used, the
majority attempts, toward the end of its opinion, to reassure those who
oppose same-sex marriage that their rights of conscience will be
protected. Ante, at 26–27. We will soon see whether this proves to be
true. I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to
whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they
repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and
treated as such by governments, employers, and schools.
In
this respect, social and religious conservatives are reviving left-wing arguments made in the 1980s and 1990s by radical feminists like Catherine MacKinnon and by critical race
theorists like Mari Matsuda. They argued that sexist and racist speech
silenced (and therefore censored) women and minorities, because they were afraid to speak up for themselves and
be thought crazy or disagreeable. In the same way, Alito argues, general acceptance of equal rights for gays is going to silence religious people,
who will be afraid to say what they think because they will be thought
backward or bigoted.
Sam Alito as Mari Matsuda and Catherine MacKinnon. Talk about your ideological drift. Posted
2:05 PM
by JB [link]