E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Gay rights, religious accommodations, and antidiscrimination law
Andrew Koppelman
A symposium on "Religious Accommodations in the Age of Civil Rights" has just been published in the Southern California Law Review. My contribution,"Gay Rights, Religious Accommodations, and the Purposes of Antidiscrimination Law," is available here. This is the abstract:
Religious
conservatives feel that it would be sinful for them to personally
facilitate same-sex marriages, and they have sought to amend the laws to
accommodate their objections. These efforts have been fiercely
resisted. The resistance is largely unnecessary. Gay rights advocates
have misconceived the tort of discrimination as a particularized injury
to the person rather than the artifact of social engineering that it
really is. Religious conservatives likewise have failed to grasp the
purposes of antidiscrimination law, and so have demanded accommodations
that would be massively overbroad. If those purposes are carefully
disaggregated, the result is different from what advocates on either
side have demanded.
This issue exposes a major flaw in
progressive thought, one that entrenches the very inequalities the left
seeks to combat. The individual-injury-based conception of
antidiscrimination law has not only produced excessively harsh treatment
of religious conservatives. It has entrenched racial and gender
subordination, by imagining discrimination to be the conduct of a few
bad actors rather than a structural wrong that demands structural
remedies.