E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Defending the sex discrimination argument from the left
Andrew Koppelman
Some of the recent criticisms of the sex discrimination argument for same-sex marriage have come from the left, arguing that the argument does not do justice to the reality of discrimination against lesbians and gay men. The argument in fact does not do it justice, but this is true of legal argument generally. I responded to such arguments in some detail in a 2001 article, responding to criticisms from Edward Stein. In light of the renewed interest in the sex discrimination argument, I'm posting that article onto SSRN. It is here. Here is the abstract: Edward
Stein’s is only the latest and most systematic of a growing number of
criticisms of the sex discrimination argument, from the left and the
right. Stein’s doctrinal objections to the argument misconceive the
reach of present doctrine, which treats all sex-based classifications
with deep suspicion. His empirical doubts misapprehend both the
argument’s claims and the enduring connections between heterosexism and
sexism. His only persuasive claim is his moral objection, which argues
that the sex discrimination argument ignores, and may render invisible, a
central moral wrong of anti-gay discrimination. This is a profound
moral difficulty, but it is one that is present in almost any legal
argument, and perhaps in language as such. It therefore cannot be an
objection against any particular argument. Posted
7:39 AM
by Andrew Koppelman [link]