E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
I am attending and presenting at the Innovation Law Beyond IP 2 conference hosted by the Yale Information Society Project. As the conference website notes, IP is only one of many legal institutions that can help promote, stifle, or govern knowledge production. The website then lists some of the categories of measure that national (or sub-national) governments can use to promote innovation production and dissemination, in part reproducing a taxonomy of measures that I developed in a prior work. These are:
subsidies of different forms (which could include intellectual property rights as a wealth transfer in the form of a grant of property rights)
procurement by the government, with various kinds of risk sharing and timing considerations
direct development by government institutions
creation or promotion of different forms of commons
various forms of product or market regulation (in which category I place IP rights, and which affects market returns and thus private investment and innovation behaviors).
The focus of the conference is on the role that states should play in innovation law, and how to design state institutions to meet the challenge of innovating effectively (based in part on successful past experiences with “state-led innovation”).
Although such theoretical analyses are helpful and long overdue, they may prove useless unless accompanied by changes to actual determinants of innovation policies in practice. As my current presentation will discuss, eight general factors that are not related to optimal innovation theories actually determine how we make our government funding decisions that affect innovation. These factors are:
politics, which includes bureaucratic missions and strength of incumbents
regulatory factors and liability
globalization, including fragmentation of value chains
networks, power, and institutions
economics and psychological motivations
option and portfolio approaches to funding
stability (or not) of funding streams, which affects levels and timing of efforts
ideology, particularly beliefs in the relative value of government or market-based action.
There is thus---and will likely remain---a mismatch between our innovation theories and the actual determinants of our innovation funding practices.A great start for the analysis of the actual causes of dysfunction in our innovation infrastructure and what we may do to improve the situation is the recently published book The Science of Science Policy. I have some additional ideas in this regard, which I will present, but much more needs to be done. Hopefully, the conference will help to further identify particular circumstances where these mismatches between optimal innovation and actual practice occur and how to get our political economy more in line with our innovation goals.
Joshua D. Sarnoff is Professor of Law at DePaul University and a faculty member in and former director of the Center for Intellectual Property Law & Information Technology. He can be reached at jsarnoff at depaul.edu.