E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
A Marriage by Any Other Name: Why Civil Unions Should Receive Federal Recognition
Andrew Koppelman
The
federal government now recognizes same-sex marriages as triggering
rights and responsibilities under federal law. However, it still
generally refuses to recognize alternative legal statuses — civil unions
and domestic partnerships — that were created by states to serve as
functional marriages. Even though all the states that created such
alternative policies now permit same-sex couples to marry, this
misguided policy causes ongoing harms. Some same-sex couples who entered
into alternative relationships when marriage was not an option may now
lack the capacity to marry. Couples who have since married may also be
hurt by the federal government’s refusal to recognize civil unions or
domestic partnerships retroactively, even in situations where it is now
recognizing same-sex marriages retroactively.
In an essay that my coauthor, Prof. Deborah Widiss, and I have just posted on SSRN, we argue
that the current federal policy is based on a mindlessly literalist
approach to statutory interpretation that should be repudiated. Federal
law generally looks to state law to determine valid marriages, and the
state laws that created these alternative statuses defined them to be
fully equivalent to marriages in all respects. Couples who enter into
such unions thus make exactly the same legal commitments to each other
that couples who marry make to each other. Just as the federal
government routinely recognizes foreign marriages, even when called
something other than “marriage,” it should recognize state civil unions
or domestic partnerships that are likewise legally indistinguishable
from (other) marriages. Posted
9:17 AM
by Andrew Koppelman [link]