E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Attending a workshop at the International Association of Constitutional Law's meeting in Oslo, I heard a lawyer from Hong Kong pose that question. He prefaced it with the observation that a large number of lawyers in Hong Kong plan to demonstrate on June 27 against a statement issued by the authorities in Beijing dealing with judges in Hong Kong, which, he said, effectively stated that judges there should indeed be patriotic toward the People's Republic of China, of which Kong Kong is a "Special Administrative Region."
I thought it was a terrific question. Stephen Ellman of New York Law School followed up with the observation that it is common in the United States for scholars to describe judges as involved in a collaborative enterprise of (good) governance with executives and legislators. He referred specifically to the Legal Process school of the 1950s and thereafter. But, I suspect that even people who reject Legal Process thinking in favor of, say, originalism would agree that judges' job includes (is?) contributing as best they can to a long-term project of governing a country well. (It's just that, to continue my example, originalists think that originalism is a better way to make that contribution than legal-process thinking,) So, in that sense, everyone thinks that judges should indeed be patriotic.
If the nation is one as to which patriotism is an appropriate stance, that is.
Yet, what are the chances that a national political system as which no one should be patriotic will allow its judges to be anything other than patriotic? (And, to be clear, I regard the identification of nations as to which patriotism is an appropriate stance as an open question -- open, that is, even to people who are citizens of the nation under consideration.)