Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts The Supreme Court Confirmation Process
|
Wednesday, April 09, 2014
The Supreme Court Confirmation Process
Gerard N. Magliocca
If you believe Nate Silver, then the GOP has a fine chance of taking control of the Senate in 2015. The last time that a Democratic President appointed a Justice confirmed by a Republican Senate was in 1895 (Rufus Peckham, the author of Lochner), so this is a rare political conjunction/junction. I want to make two observations about how a party change in the Senate could shape the Court.
Comments:
"It's hard to know what kind of Democratic nominee can get a majority (or sixty votes) in a chamber controlled by Republicans,"
The kind Obama wouldn't even consider nominating, I'd guess. A lot depends on who left, and under what circumstances. One of the minority, he could probably get away with nominating a younger moderate, because nothing would immediately change. OTOH, if it's one of the majority, (Maybe Thomas has a heart attack...) I don't see any chance at all of a Republican Senate confirming anybody Obama would be willing to nominate. If it's one of the majority, and they died in a remotely suspicious manner, better have plenty of food and water stockpiled, it isn't just going to be a political fight.
Jeffrey Toobin has argued that Sri Srinivasan has been teed up for possible nomination, and both his biography (incl. his clerkships and past legal practice) and the way he sailed through his confirmation proceedings for the D.C. Circuit suggest that it would be difficult for conservatives to muster any plausible argument against him, other than "Obama nominated him". The fact that he makes liberals nervous would be a bonus to conservatives. Now he just needs to avoid writing any telling opinions on the D.C. Circuit until the spot opens up.
The assumption of "genuine swing vote" seems to be that such a justice would be nominated by a Republican President. Assuming the descriptions of Kennedy or O'Connor as a swing vote, who knew when each was confirmed?
Kennedy was replacing a "swing vote" (Powell), so that concern was a big factor in the nomination process though at the time, he was less important than he is now.
O'Connor replaced Stewart, who was in effect a moderate that was a centrist (see, e.g., The Brethren -- "The Middle Holds" -- of course, then STEVENS was supposed to be there), so that might have been a concern, but I doubt it was much at the time. As to Brett's comment, it very well might be an honest account of what Republicans will do. They have filibustered people they previously said they supported. So, yes, it's quite possible that no one he would nominate, even someone who leans right, would be supported. Obama has repeatedly found people for the lower courts that Republicans have found acceptable, including home senators. So, he probably can find someone to replace Scalia that is quite credible to Republican 1995. But, Republican 2015, not so much.
I don't see any reason why the Rs would allow a vote on any Obama nominee. They'll prefer to gamble on the outcome of 2016. Now, that's a poor gamble IMO, but I think they'll take it.
Oh, I think they'd be willing to leave it empty for quite a while, longer if filling it meant changing the balance on the Court. Of course, they may not need to wait very long, depending on when the vacancy arises.
Okay.
(1) It might matter who retires. A long absence to fill the Ginsburg seat with some late 50s solid female appellate judge will be different than if Scalia leaves. (2) If someone leaves in June 2015, leaving the slot open for a term and a half to me (not that care to ask) is a hard sell for Republicans. 2016, sure. The MSM might even make that sound "proper."
#1 sounds right. My bet is that the Rs would gamble on #2 and take the heat. The cost to them is too great.
Well, not hoping for it or anything, but be interesting to see.
Scalia retires and Obama appoints some totally respectable somewhat right leaning sort and they pull that, be um interesting. Don't see Obama in that situation being dumb and appoint a Fortas. Be someone some on the left won't like that much, but an improvement. Then again, anyone other than Paul Clement, maybe the Rs will just do as you say.
"So, yes, it's quite possible that no one he would nominate, even someone who leans right, would be supported."
Actually, my view is that, for the Supreme court, Obama might be willing to nominate somebody liberals regard as leaning right, particularly if replacing one of the conservatives, but probably not anybody conservatives would so view. (Cue the cries of "no true Scotsman!" For instance, I'm fairly certain that Republicans would vote to confirm Alex Kozinski to the Supreme court. Do you suppose Obama would be willing to nominate him, to replace one of the current majority?
Jack Balkin's "The Last Days of Disco: Why the American Political System is Dysfunctional" builds in the scenario of the role of the Court as the change in political power takes place with demographic change. The transition may be delayed because of the Court.
I don't think Obama would nominate Alex Kozinski to replace Ginsburg or Breyer, nor would that be sensible or match what presidents traditionally have done & have deemed to have a right to have.
If Scalia or one of those on the right had to retire, yes, Obama very well possibly might appoint a sixty-five year old who has shown true libertarian leanings and did things like support race based programs, strike down tracking devices on privacy grounds, visited people in prison, shown himself to be a consistent free speech libertarian ala Kennedy etc. Just like Obama as part of a lower court deal nominated someone the various left leaning groups are strongly against. OTOH, I don't think Republicans controlling the Senate necessarily would support Kozinsi, just like they basically as a block opposed a former Republican senator who was pretty conservative when he was up for Secretary of Defense.
Cabranes might be confirmable, but I don't think the WH would want to nominate him. Maybe Hull because she voted against PPACA, but I don't know much about her, not my circuit.
Gerard N. Magliocca said...Who is this swing vote person though?
Obama can't find another Kennedy among all the federal and state appellate judges? The problem is not a lack of supply, but rather that Democrats have intentionally declined to appoint any swing votes to the Court in a couple generations.
Is a "swing vote" on the Court based on foresight resulting from the nomination/approval process or by way of hindsight following years of performance by a Justice? Some say hindsight is 20-20. But Political Scientists are not 20-20 on empirical studies. So how effective can the foresight of the nomination/approval process be? Consider the "OOPS!" moments of Presidents who have regretted some of their nominations who were approved.
Mark Field: "Oh, I think they'd be willing to leave it empty for quite a while, longer if filling it meant changing the balance on the Court. Of course, they may not need to wait very long, depending on when the vacancy arises."
Agreed. If there's one thing which characterizes the modern GOP, it's total willingness to ignore custom.
(Someone older who won't be on the bench for long? Someone with a more bipartisan profile?) It's been a long time since a Justice was confirmed who was not predictable, but that could end in 2015.
Some say hindsight is 20-20. But Political Scientists are not 20-20 on empirical studies. So how effective can the foresight of the nomination/approval process be? Consider the "OOPS!" moments of Presidents who have regretted some of their nominations who were approved.phoenixlol.com
lol代练 buy fifa 14 coins fifa 14 coins
Great details here, better yet to discover out your blog which is fantastic. Nicely done!!!
lighting poles
Wow! Thanks a lot to you! I always desired to write in my own website something like you have shared. home security system
Wow! Thanks a lot to you! I always desired to write in my own website something like you have shared. home security system thanks so much i like very so much your post حلي الاوريو الفطر الهندي صور تورتة حلى قهوه طريقة عمل السينابون طريقة عمل بلح الشام بيتزا هت كيكة الزبادي حلا سهل صور كيك عجينة العشر دقائق طريقة عمل الدونات طريقة عمل البان كيك طريقة عمل الكنافة طريقة عمل البسبوسة طريقة عمل الكيك طريقة عمل عجينة البيتزا فوائد القرفه
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |