E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Geoffrey Stone's latest criticism of "conservative" Supreme Court justices focuses on their practices in selecting law clerks. Professor Stone reports that of the twenty law clerks currently in the chambers of Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito, eighteen previously clerked for a Republican-appointed lower court judge. Of the sixteen law clerks in the chambers of Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, nine clerked previously for Democratic-appointed judges. He concludes: "Whereas the more liberal justices were clearly interested in exposing themselves to a range of different viewpoints and having the positions challenged, the conservative justices went way out of their way to ensure that their law clerks were already in sync with their judicial ideology." Let's leave aside the laughably bad methodology here. Let's also leave aside the chutzpah of a liberal law professor who clerked for a liberal justice (Brennan) calling for the justices to hire clerks who will challenge their own views. The bigger problem is Professor Stone's conclusion. It takes a very strange word view to imagine that unless you get a 25 year old law school graduate right there in chambers to impart the truth, the seventy or eighty year old Supreme Court justice will be totally unaware that there exist different ways to approach and think about issues. It seems to me the influence is much more likely to run the other way. For, could a new law school graduate spend a year working closely with Chief Justice Roberts or with Justice Scalia or Justice Thomas or one of the other "conservatives" and not be shaped, perhaps fundamentally changed, by the experience? Perhaps that's the real argument for getting the liberal law graduate into the "conservative" chambers. Posted
2:33 PM
by Jason Mazzone [link]