E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Legal scholars often write about law and war, including war’s impact
on constitutional rights and powers. But what about war’s assumed
opposite: peace? If war is exceptional – a rupture of normal time, as
Jeh Johnson, then General Counsel of the Defense Department, suggested in a recent speech
-- then peace is thought to be our normal time. Peace seems to do a
lot of work in American law and politics, since the arrival of peace (or
the process of war’s ending and the transition to peace) is assumed to
bring about a recalibration of the exceptional legal regime that war
requires.
But what is peace, and how does it work in
contemporary law and politics? Are there two sharp categories
(war/peace), so that peace is the absence of military conflict, turning
off the spigot of the war powers? Or is peace, sometimes enforced by
soldiers carrying arms and wearing blue UN Peacekeeping helmets, a form
of military conflict? Is peace a tactic or a rhetoric in a world of
ongoing conflict? Or is peace and idealized imagined state, a goal of
human striving, that, like the concept of heaven, simply cannot exist in
the material world?
An imaginative and interdisciplinary group of scholars took up these questions on an AALS panel in January on The Concept of Peace in Law, Culture and Society.
In a series of posts over the next week or two, I’ll share with you
summaries or snippets from their presentations. The roundtable,
organized by Matteo Taussig-Rubbo and me, included a historian of peace,
Petra Goedde, Temple University Department of History; founder of the
U.S. Institute of Peace, John N. Moore, University of Virginia School of
Law; and interdisciplinary legal scholars Kim Lane Scheppele, Princeton
University; Mateo Taussig-Rubbo, University at Buffalo Law School and
Ruti G. Teitel, New York Law School(and me as Moderator).