E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Can Mitt Romney Succeed as President? (And a Note on Terrible Titles)
JB
Over at the Atlantic, I have a long essay applying Stephen Skoworonek's theories to a Mitt Romney presidency. I conclude, consistent with Gerard's view on this blog, that a Romney presidency would find itself in a very weak position politically. Romney would either be an affiliated president who would find it hard to keep his fractious party unified, or a disjunctive president who would preside over the end of the Reagan regime. For the full analysis, read the whole thing. (Also see Justin Peck's very interesting analysis from last month, which reaches a similar conclusion.)
Unfortunately, you don't get to choose the titles when you write for a major magazine, and the editors at the Atlantic chose two pretty awful titles for the piece. The first is "Does the GOP want a Romney Presidency?" Well of course they do! Would they rather have Barack Obama running the government and picking the judges for the next four years? The second title, which in its way is even more egregious, is "Political Science Says: A Romney Presidency Would Be Doomed." This is the sort of headline that should make any serious scholar cringe. Of course, political science says no such thing. There are lots of theories about the presidency, and even if one starts from Skowronek's premises, it's not certain what the result will be. All we can do is engage in educated guesses based on historical analogies, which are never perfect. My best guess is that Romney would be in a whole lot of trouble if he wins, but I don't think that political science has proven this. Again, read the whole thing and decide for yourself.
UPDATE: The editors have now changed the title to the more plausible "Why the GOP should fear a Romney Presidency." The point is that the old Reagan coalition is nearing exhaustion, the contemporary GOP is in a quandary, and the party will soon have to change, whether it wins this election or not. Of course, even if Republicans have reason to fear that Romney will be an ineffective president, I suspect they probably fear Barack Obama more. Posted
4:31 PM
by JB [link]