Balkinization |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahman sabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts A PhD in Law? Yes. A PhD in Law.
|
Monday, September 10, 2012
A PhD in Law? Yes. A PhD in Law.
Gordon Silverstein As many of you may have heard, Yale Law School has announced a new PhD in Law program – applications are now being accepted for admission to begin study toward the PhD in September of 2013. Jack kindly offered me a chance to guest blog about this new program – which I am intimately involved with as the recently hired Assistant Dean for Graduate Programs at Yale Law School.
It is true that while the vast bulk of successful legal academics completed their formal education with the JD degree, a growing number of law professors now have PhDs in cognate
fields like Economics or Political Science, or from explicitly interdisciplinary programs. A PhD in Law will not, cannot and
should not supplant these other avenues. But a PhD in Law will add something distinct and quite
important.
It seems there are two important themes to consider – what is
different about Yale’s PhD in Law,
and why that matters.
Unlike PhD programs designed for students who wish to learn
about law from the disciplinary perspectives of a cognate field, Yale’s PhD in
Law degree is for students who have already earned a JD at an American law
school and who wish to pursue advanced studies in law from the perspective of
law, contributing to, and building upon the traditions of legal research. While many would contest
the idea of law as a discipline, surely after more than 100 years of important
and successful scholarly – theoretical and applied – accomplishments, law ought to be able to make a claim as an important and independent field of study. A PhD in Law, one that seeks to cross the classic
lines dividing public from private, domestic from international, transactional
from normative and so many more, is something well worth pursuing and
developing. Yale’s PhD in law will offer young scholars as well as future
practitioners and policy makers an opportunity to contribute to the development
of law as an academic field, and it will provide an alternate path into law
teaching alongside existing routes such as fellowships, advanced degrees in
cognate fields, and transitioning directly from practice or clerkships.
There are, of course, a number law schools that house and support various PhD programs. These tend to break into three groups – (1) interdisciplinary programs (such as the august program in Jurisprudence and Social Policy at Berkeley); (2) joint-degree programs that offer a JD in conjunction with a PhD in a cognate field such as Political Science or History at a wide range of law schools; and (3) more specialized, focused cross-disciplinary programs such as Vanderbilt’s PhD in Law and Economics. And these, of course, are all in addition to the venerable and deeply valued LLM and JSD programs at Yale and elsewhere.
(1) Interdisciplinary programs are asking (and answering)
questions about law, legal institutions, and social and political behavior, but
they deploy the disciplinary norms, methods, and canonical literature of other
fields and disciplines to do so. (Berkeley’s JSP program – which helped found
and build the Law & Society movement – explicitly and effectively deploys the methods and theoretical approaches of the traditional social science disciplines). Many students in these interdisciplinary programs will
earn a JD alongside their PhD – but not always.
(2) Focused cross-disciplinary PhD programs – such as a PhD
in Law and Economics – also are asking and answering important questions about
law, but rather than developing an interdisciplinary tradition, these programs maintain
a deep and specific focus: Law as studied through the lens of economic theory
and methods, for example.
(3) The classic dual-degree programs, where students complete the JD in the law school, and, separately, a PhD in a cognate field. The PhD in these cases is very much the intellectual product of the cognate field, and the student's dissertation often is supervised by an advisor whose training and disciplinary focus is exclusively in the cognate field rather than in law.
Which brings us to Yale’s PhD in Law. This is meant to be a
PhD in the field of law – the study of law from the perspective of law. That’s
new (at least in the United States). Law schools in the United States have long
worn many hats – they are the source of professional training in the practice
of law as well as the source of both basic and applied research in everything from jurisprudence and philosophy to transactional law, from international and comparative law to alternative dispute resolution, from intellectual property and legal history to public policy and election law and much more. But with more than 100
years of experience in the study of law, it is more than a little surprising that there has not been greater formal effort to study law as more than the sum of its parts. There are
important questions that legal research, legal scholarship and legal thought
can help to solve in ways cognate fields cannot: Not only will the PhD in Law help
us to think about what is distinct to legal scholarship, as well as what is profitably borrowed,
and also what legal scholarship, what the study of law from the perspective of law might contribute to these cognate fields.
As would a PhD student in Economics, a PhD student in Law needs to start with a broad understanding of the full field before embarking on a
dissertation that will dig deeply into one the student's area of expertise and concentration within the broader field. To provide a common foundation on which to build this program, all
students applying for admission to the Yale PhD in Law program must have a JD
from an American law school as a prerequisite for admission. This will provide
a common baseline, and ensure that PhDs in law are well trained in legal
reasoning and well prepared to help train the next generation of legal
practitioners. Admitted students will continue to broaden and deepen
their studies: All PhD students will be required to enroll in a two-semester
proseminar much like the proseminars PhD students in History or Sociology
would be required to take. This two-semester sequence of courses – led by a team of Yale
Law School faculty – will expose the PhD students to different perspectives on
the canon of legal scholarship and ask them to engage deeply with these
traditions through their own supervised research and writing.
PhD students also will be required to take additional courses
of their choosing to enable them to gain
expertise in materials relevant to their own research plan. These courses will
be drawn from a set of graduate seminars offered within the law school as well
as graduate seminars offered in cognate fields for those whose dissertation
work would benefit from such courses. Students will then be required to take general, comprehensive exams as well as narrower oral exams in their field of expertise.Finally, students will research and write a dissertation –
which can take the form either of three articles appropriate for publication in
a major law review or a book-length manuscript.
Throughout this process, PhD
students will be guided and supervised by a three person faculty committee that they will assemble to suit their project and interests. In
addition, PhD students will be given training and practice in the art of law teaching,
as well as extensive opportunities to participate in faculty and student
workshops, and in seminars designed to enhance their professional as well as
academic development. On a more nuts-and-bolts level, students will be provided
with a tuition waiver, health insurance and year-round stipends for the three
years we anticipate they will spend in residence at Yale as well as access to
all of the University’s resources: As members of the Graduate School of Arts
& Sciences, as well as the Law School, PhD students also will be welcome to take
courses across the university and participate in student organizations,
academic centers and a wealth of other opportunities on and off-campus.
There are important questions to answer and challenges to
meet in the understanding of law that a PhD program is ideally suited to
address. In no way does it supplant or replace Yale’s outstanding JD, LLM, MSL
and JSD programs – but instead it is an innovative and exciting addition to
them, and I am delighted to be able to participate in its development.
I would, of course, be more than happy to try to answer any questions
– and would frankly welcome thoughts, comments and suggestions as we launch
this new initiative. You can find further information about the program here, and
applications, which are administered by Yale’s Graduate School of Arts & Sciences,
can be found here.
Please feel free to contact me at: gordon.silverstein@yale.edu
Posted 7:00 PM by Gordon Silverstein [link]
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers ![]() Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) ![]() David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) ![]() Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). ![]() Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) ![]() Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) ![]() Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) ![]() Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) ![]() Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) ![]() Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution ![]() Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) ![]() Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) ![]() Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) ![]() Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) ![]() Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic ![]() Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) ![]() David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) ![]() Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |