E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
What is the most effective way for a president to challenge the Supreme Court?
JB
Over at the Atlantic, I discuss the current calls for President Obama to "run against the Supreme Court" as well as recent calls for rethinking judicial review.
I point out that "running against the Court" is an undertheorized concept, and that careful attention to historical examples shows that successful presidents in modern times have not, in fact, directly run against the Court, nor have they challenged the Court's power to review congressional legislation.
Instead, successful presidential candidates who challenge the Supreme Court have woven their criticisms into a larger narrative in which the Court plays a comparatively minor role. In particular, successful candidates have argued that the Court has had hindered important and popular social reforms. They have associated the Court with far less popular political opponents, and they have successfully portrayed the Justices as out-of-touch or as out of step with core American values. Last but not least, they have promised to use the appointments process to reshape the Court's doctrines, restore a correct interpretation of the Constitution, and redeem it from judges who have confused their political preferences with what the Constitution truly means.
I conclude by considering how President Obama might employ these time-tested strategies in the 2012 election. Posted
4:15 PM
by JB [link]