E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
The Project on War and Security in Law, Culture and Society
Mary L. Dudziak
I'm pleased to announce the launch in Fall 2012 of the Project on War
and Security in Law, Culture and Society at Emory Law School, where I will be Director of the project and the (as yet unnamed chair) professor
of law. While I have been thinking about an interdisciplinary law-and-war-related project for
some time, I started putting thoughts on paper in a more focused way on
this blog and elsewhere in response to reactions to my new book and
related commentary. So I must especially thank Benjamin Wittes, who prompted this post.
There
are a few reasons that this project will be at Emory. Most important
is that the law school is at the beginning of a promising era, with the appointment of Robert Schapiro as Dean, which has generated much
excitement on campus. The university as a whole is a terrific fit for
this project due to significant interest in war in the Political Science
Department, beginning with its Chair, Dan Reiter. Human rights
history scholar and long-time friend Carol Anderson is also at Emory,
along with others at the law school and elsewhere on campus who I look
forward to collaborating with. And then there’s the end of
cross-country commuting, and other family-related reasons that make
Atlanta attractive. Having a lateral offer is always a good time to
pitch a new project, and both deans offered full support for the
start-up. It is a project instead of a center because I think that not
every idea needs a center and the bureaucracy that can go with it, so
the focus will be on ideas and not infrastructure. At least for now.
The
project’s first event will be a fall lecture by legal historian John Witt, Yale Law School, who will discuss his exciting new book, Lincoln’s Code: The Laws of War in American History (date and details to be determined). A grad seminar and
colloquium series will begin in spring 2013. I will also create a web
presence for the project, and which I’ll post about when that’s up and
running.
Here’s the basic idea, from the project proposal:
Many American law schools have developed programs focused
on legal issues related to war and national security. Meanwhile,
serious study of the nature of war and security is underway in many
other disciplines, including political science, history and
anthropology. Although interdisciplinarity is a central feature of
American legal scholarship, programs on law and national security tend
to focus intently on law and policy, and do not have interdisciplinary
inquiry as a central objective. This deprives legal study of war and
security of broader critical inquiry that is essential to understanding
this area.
This Project proceeds from the premise that the study
of law and war is necessarily an interdisciplinary inquiry. Legal
scholars often carefully analyze the law, but they take "war" as a given
- as a feature of the world that does not require the same close
interrogation. There have been compelling reasons for the narrow focus
of other programs, as the changing nature of warfare presents new legal
and policy questions. But a full understanding of the intersection of
law and war/security requires a broader canvas. It is best pursued in
an interdisciplinary environment involving scholars and law and graduate
students trained in different fields.
This idea paper proposes a
workshop series and related courses and programs aimed at an
interdisciplinary approach to the study of law and war. The core of the
Project would be a deeply interdisciplinary workshop series, modeled
after the Project on the Rhetoric of Inquiry, a brilliant and rigorous
seminar directed by economist Deirdre McClosky at the University of Iowa
in the 1980s. Ideally the Project will eventually expand to include
post-docs and other components, but this will depend on outside funding.