E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Are Federal Judges Required to Cite the Bible as Authority for Constitutional Decisions?
Gerard N. Magliocca
Rick's post gives me an excuse to make the following observation. On a couple of occasions during the 1866 campaign, John Bingham told voters that the purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was to put the Golden Rule in the Constitution. For example, in a speech on August 24, 1866, he discussed Section One of the Amendment and said: “Is it objected to by any Christian man, to embody in your Constitution at least the simple golden rule you learned at your mother’s knee: ‘Whatsoever ye would that others should do unto you, do ye even so unto them?'”
Now here's my (half-serious) interpretative question. Does the Golden Rule state a prohibition on discriminatory intent or a bar on acts that also have a disparate impact? Posted
4:50 PM
by Gerard N. Magliocca [link]
The "original" Golden Rule has been nuanced by the current GOP Presidential candidates to their version: "He who has the gold rules" especially thanks to the Citizens United-five. Perhaps the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment might challenge the "required" in Gerard's question, unless Gerard is suggesting that the Section One of the 14th Amendment provides otherwise.
he Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate (but largely discretionary) appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases.[1] The Court, which meets in the United States Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C., consists of a chief justice and eight associate justices who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Once appointed, justices have life tenure unless they are removed after impeachment. sell Structured Settlement