Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts What Federal Loans Do for Law Students and Law Schools
|
Thursday, November 03, 2011
What Federal Loans Do for Law Students and Law Schools
Brian Tamanaha
Federal loans for law students are justified as “providing access” to a legal career for the middle class and poor. That’s one side. When you examine how the funding operates, however, it becomes apparent that federal loans are an irresistible (and life-sustaining) drug for revenue addicted law schools.
Comments:
Brian,
Do you have stats on the number of attorneys per capita in the U.S. from 2000 to date? How might such stats correlate with law school student loans over the same period of time? When Congress was "debating" student loans, were questions raised that such might result in increasing college (and law school) tuitions? And what were the roles of higher education in limiting the bankruptcy remedy for student loans?
Shag,
You can find detailed statistics on this at Law School Tuition Bubble. The short answer is that a big jump in the number of attorneys per capita occurred in the 1960s and 1070s, and it continued to climb gradually through the 1980s. Then the per capita number held steady, and even slightly declined in the past decade, as the population increased faster than the number of new lawyers. I recall a law review article (not at hand) written in the 1980s by John Kramer (dean of Tulane) that worried over whether the federal loan program would fuel tuition increases. I do not know what role, if any, higher education played in limiting bankruptcy for student loans. The key element for the availability of private loans is the federal guarantee of the loans--which eliminates the risk of default for the lender. For law students today, all of the loans are provided directly by the federal government (Stafford and GradPlus), cutting out private lenders.
A basic supply and demand graph would suggest that that if you artificially increase the demand for a product by subsidizing it, the price of that product will rise.
We saw this with the government promotion and subsidy of Alt-A and subprime home mortgages starting in the late 90s, causing a spike in demand and a housing price bubble. The fallout when the over-leveraged home owners defaulted and the government largely withdrew the subsidies for Alt-A and subprime home mortgages should be a warning to universities. The same thing will eventually happen with student loans.
A hallowed right-wing myth.
Reality of course has a well known liberal bias. But please, do go on believing whatever you like. Don't let the facts get in your way. Freedom includes the freedom to believe nonsense.
jpk:
The government's pressure on lenders to make Alt-A and subprime home mortgages and then its subsidy of Freddie and Fannie to purchase these toxic assets is well established. I recommend you read: Peter Wallison's dissent from the Obama financial crisis whitewash. http://fcic-static.law.stanford.edu/cdn_media/fcic-reports/fcic_final_report_wallison_dissent.pdf Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner's Reckless Endangerment. http://www.amazon.com/Reckless-Endangerment-Outsized-Corruption-Armageddon/dp/0805091203 Liberal economist Raghuram Rajan's Fault Lines http://www.amazon.com/Fault-Lines-Fractures-Threaten-Economy/dp/0691146837 Both the Wallison report and the Mrogenson book are packed with primary sources you can also read. Forget the myths you have been fed. There has been no deregulation of home mortgage lending standards during our lifetimes. Indeed, there was no need for regulation because banks refused to accept the risk of making Alt-A and Subprime loans for decades until the regulators who are tasked with maintaining the viability of our financial system started pushing banks to make these loans in the 90s and provided them with a way to offload the risk onto the taxpayers by selling them to Fannie and Freddie. Asset based instruments into which these high risk mortgages were bundled would never have failed absent the Alt-A and Subprime loan defaults starting in 2006.
jpk:
Please do read Krugman's articles as well. When you compare the two, you will see just how thin is the defense of the government's role in creating the primary and secondary Alt-1 and subprime mortgage markets.
A basic supply and demand graph would suggest that that if you artificially increase the demand for a product by subsidizing it, the price of that product will rise.
Bart's full of it about the subprime crisis, but he's right about this basic point. Basically, if you pour a lot of money into student loans and grants, accredited universities, which have an effective oligopoly, are going to pocket it by increasing tuition and fees. And that's what has happened.
Bart Bart Bart Bart Bart,
If you can read and follow this simple sentence, you'll be just fine: "do go on believing whatever you like" It is of zero interest to me whether you can.
Dilan:
Your comment makes sense, but it is only part of the truth. Let's set aside all the frills that prospective students/parents want and those demanded by the top-pick athletic recruits ("That other university has three Olympic sized pools!"). There is so much more to teach and so much more need (real in many disciplines) for technology, lab equipment, funds for student research, etc., than when I attended college that costs for universities ad colleges that want the best studets have gone up quite independently of loans and subsidies for loans. We also face other costs that most institutions of higher ed did not face in the good/bad old days: under-prepared students, students with a whole range of special needs (from physical accomodations to learnign accomodations), litigious parents, increasing numbers of students with psychological problems, demands that we 'prove' we are teaching students what we aim to teach them, and so on. Faculty would, mostly, be happy to get rid of the high-cost athletics programs, to reduce the numbers of [well-paid] administrators, and to trim the 'frills.' But, I think, even many administrators feel caught up in a vortex of demands from various constituencies such that we must all always be doing more, improving, competing, whatever. THis drives up the price tag.
CTS' point:
"But, I think, even many administrators feel caught up in a vortex of demands from various constituencies such that we must all always be doing more, improving, competing, whatever. THis drives up the price tag." in the for-profit sector might result in creating competition at a lower price, perhaps leading to "creative destructionism." Should non-profit higher education institutions be sacrosanct? I have heard that lobbyists employed by such non-profits pushing for student loans also pushed for making discharge in bankruptcy difficult in order to seal the deal. The institutions are clearly being subsidized. But in reality, are the students? At least homeowners with subprime mortgages may result in potential itemized income tax deductions serving as a form of subsidy, as well as a better chance at bankruptcy discharge. Student loans made it easier for parents to push the expense of higher education onto their children. Some parents of course truly could not afford such expense. But many parents could have contributed, perhaps wishing to increase their retirement assets or to "live a better life" unburdened by such expenses because of the availability of student loans. I recall "the rule" of some of my peer group of parents: "We'll take care of college. Grad school is on your ticket."
JPK:
In that case, I suggest you avoid posting about facts of which you are ignorant and have "zero interest."
So confused for so long -- perhaps you should be a Republican!
I didn't say I had zero interest in the facts. I said I had zero interest in your abilities. Such as the ability to read. But I do wish you the best of luck in your fight against reality!
Probably a better, at least a more plausible, explanation for the persistence of this right wing myth: here .
Summary: a fact inconvenient to the right wing is LESS regulation caused the financial crisis. So it's not that conservatives are idiots; by and large, they're not. But it's severely politically incorrect for them to admit facts that show bad things happening as a result of government inaction. So they pretend it was too much government interference.
Federal student loans forgiveness is the name used when the federal government decides to cancel a complete educational loan or part of it under a variety of circumstances. If a former student who took advantage of a federal educational loan to fund his or her college or post-college education decides to undergo federal student loans forgiveness, he or she should pass a number of qualifications.
Post a Comment
Pay day Loans
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |