E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Maples v. Thomas. I blogged about the case earlier this year.
Petitioner Cory Maples was convicted of murder and sentenced to death in Alabama. Because of a screw-up in the mail room of a major law firm representing Mr. Maples pro bono, he missed the deadline to appeal the denial of his state petition for post-conviction relief. When Mr. Maples subsequently filed a federal habeas petition, the district court dismissed the petition on the ground that it was procedurally defaulted and there was no cause to excuse the default. The 11th Circuit affirmed. Mr. Maples argues that the default should be excused and his federal habeas petition allowed to proceed.
This case is an easy one to call. A mailroom foreclosing federal review in a death penalty case will not sit well with a majority of the Court. The Court is therefore very likely to reverse the 11th Circuit. But this is also a bad case in which to do anything more than to give the petitioner (as the Court sometimes does) a golden ticket. It will be very hard for the Court to craft general standards about when administrative errors in law offices constitute cause for a procedural default. The result, then, will probably be a decision that helps Mr. Maples but virtually nobody else. And if the Court does decide to create general standards, the result won't be pretty: expect an opinion that provides little practical guidance to lower court judges.