Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Should Fort Knox and Yellowstone be placed on the auction block?
|
Thursday, July 07, 2011
Should Fort Knox and Yellowstone be placed on the auction block?
Sandy Levinson
The value of all gold held by the United States Government, as of June 30, 2011, according to the United States Treasury, was $11,041,058,821.09. which seems to be a "mere" eleven billion, 41 million, 58 thousand, 821 dollars and nine cents. I don't know what the value of, say, Yellowstone National Park is. I raise this with regard to Jack's invaluable posting about the precedent conditions to the President's being able to declare a sufficient "existential economic emergcy" to warrant either the invocation of Section IV of the Fourteenth Amendment or a more Schmittian declaration of Lockean prerogative power to act in an emergency to preserve the overall political order. He suggests that it must follow doing everything legally possible to enable the US to meet its debt. This means, among other things, getting money, since the basic point is that there might not be enough money in the Treasury to satisfy all creditors. Well, one way to get money, of course, is to sell assets. And the first two that came to my mind, obviously, were America's gold reserve and Yellowstone. I invite others to think of what they could imagine putting on the block. But is it really the case that the US must in fact sell down its resources in order to prevent the debt from being called into question?
Comments:
I wonder how the US Treasury calculates the value of their gold assets. If you take the current spot price of a troy ounce you get something closer to $400B, not the $11B they have booked.
I'm not so certain that dumping that much gold on the market would have the depressive effect on prices that some say it would. After all, it would be happening during a time when the US government is unable to meet its financial obligations. The resulting hit to confidence in US debt would put incredible downward pressure on the value of the dollar, and likely drive even more people into commodities markets.
Why should we even consider allowing the government sell our national assets to feed its spending habit like a spendthrift who has maxed out his credit cards and pawns his possessions to maintain an unaffordable lifestyle.
There is a real simple solution to all this - STOP SPENDING MONEY YOU DO NOT HAVE.
@Bart
Great idea. What would you cut first (keeping in mind that the sum total of ALL non-defense discretionary spending is less than 20% of the Federal Budget)? Also, how quickly do you think the private sector will absorb the tens of thousands of workers laid off due to the cuts you recommend?
Our yodeler must have had laryngitis during the Bush/Cheney eight (8) years leading to the 2008 Great Recession regarding its spending AND committing America to future debt in his Charlie McCarthy role without an Edgar Bergen to move his lips. Our yodeler is in the habit of using the words "simple" or "simply" with his remedies from the Bo(eh)ner/McConnell/Tea Party coloring book; alas, he still has problems staying within the lines. Perhaps the economy in CO has cut back on DUI offenses. Glenn Beck can market the Fort Knox gold but Exxon Mobil has created Yellowstone problems.
We could sell all of our elected representatives and political appointees. I'm sorry, make that "resell."
There are much simpler ways to do this. The federal government has the power of seignorage, that is to create currency. One obvious solution is for the Treasury to hand the Fed a platinum coin which it declares to be worth $1 trillion. The Fed is then legally obligated to credit that amount to the Treasury (or to print the dollars). Either way, problem solved with no violation of Constitution or statute and no risk economically except inflation (which risk is trivial under current conditions).
Corn:
Balance the budget in five years by cutting spending back to the FY 2000 baseline in equal installments of about $300 billion per year. Everything is on the table including conservative sacred cows like defense. Federal employees can accept substantial pay cuts bringing them back to FY 2000 levels plus inflation and pension reform or they can be laid off. I would trade off a modest net tax increase in exchange for fundamental tax reform eliminating deductions and flattening the tax rates along the lines suggested by the President's budget task force that he ignored. The economic growth from lowering rates would bring in badly needed revenue.
Our yodeler's:
" ... back to the FY 2000 baseline ... " seems to recognize something about the pre-Bush/Cheney Administration that had left a surplus for Bush/Cheney that quickly disappeared with tax cuts, wars, more tax cuts, Medicare's unfunded prescription benefits, etc. Oh for the echos from our yodeler of the good old days of the Clinton Administration.
Shag:
Both Bush and Obama spent like drunken Democrats. With the exception of its part in creating the subprime mortgage market, the post-1994 Clinton Administration was the second most conservative administration of my middle aged lifetime after Reagan. The FY 2000 baseline took the lowest percentage of GDP from the American people in over a generation. In many ways, good days indeed. Because Dems would have a problem attacking the policies of the only successful Dem President in a generation, the GOP would do well to use the FY 2000 baseline as I do.
Of course, based upon our yodeler's adulation for Bush/Cheney at this Blog during the time of their 8 years, Bush and Cheney were sober Republicans. Now, our yodeler charges them retroactively of GUI - Governing Under the Influence. But going back to the base of 2000 will not bring back those good old day as if there were a time machine. Or a De Lorean car to take us back to the Reagan days. Yet another "simple" solution.
"The economic growth from lowering rates would bring in badly needed revenue." Can we have some economically literate suggestions, please?
No, Bart, from 2001-2006 GW & his bunch spent like drunken Republicans. Obama (no fan) & his bunch have spent a fair amount, true, but they did not initiate the Bush tax cuts or the Afghani or Iraqi wars nor were they the ones to initially bailout the investment banks, those honors go to your boy GW. BTW, why are you still here commenting? Have you changed any minds? Or do you continue to post in hopes of discouraging other commenters to leave? It didn't work for me, I don't have much to say except I know to skip your comments when I see 'em, at least for the most part.
BTW, why are you still here commenting?
Have you ever heard this one? A man goes hunting for grizzly bear with a shiny new gun. After fastidious preparations and patient stalking he finally gets an enormous prize grizzly in his sites. He squeezes the trigger and his gun emits an outlandish boom and cloud of smoke. When the smoke clears the bear is nowhere to be seen, but the man feels a tap on his shoulder. He turns around to find the 10-foot beast standing behind him. The bear says to the man, "I'll give you a choice. I kill you and eat you, or I sodomize you. Take your pick." Humbly, and with an eye towards tomorrow, the man chooses the latter. Several weeks later, vowing revenge, the man returns to the scene with a bigger, shinier gun. Sadly, for the man that is, the above scenario is repeated almost exactly. After another period of shame & repentance, the man buys a bigger yet weapon and returns, hoping to settle the score with this troublesome beast once and for all. This time, when the smoke clears, and the man feels the familiar tap on his shoulder, the grizzly bear says to him, "You're not here for the hunting, are you?"
With the exception of its part in creating the subprime mortgage market, the post-1994 Clinton Administration was the second most conservative administration of my middle aged lifetime after Reagan.
Yes, Bart, when Reagan tripled the national debt we were impressed with how very conservative an administration he ran.
"But is it really the case that the US must in fact sell down its resources in order to prevent the debt from being called into question?"
If it comes to it, yes. Section 4 doesn't have an "Unless selling assets would be necessary, in which case repudiate away!" clause. But, we're nowhere near that point now, with revenues well in excess of debt service. We might want to anyway, though, as we've run up so much debt over the last few years that a return to historically normal interest rates would ruin us. Best to get that debt paid down while we're still enjoying the teaser rate.
Yes, the "bear" facts can get you in the end. [I took a careful look at our yodeler's photo to see if a bear was lurking in the background and thought of the joys of photoshopping.]
darms:
BTW, why are you still here commenting? Have you changed any minds? I have this perhaps naive belief that all people can be freed from their dogmas and superstitions by being provided with the facts - even progressives.
Our yodeler proclaims his role is to convince "even progressives":
" ... by being provided with the facts ..." but what remains in dispute are the "facts" he provides, whether bare or bear. [Note: our yodeler misspelled "knave" in his self-described belief.]
I have this perhaps naive belief that all people can be freed from their dogmas and superstitions by being provided with the facts [by me, the objective, evenhanded, humble Bart DePalma]- even progressives.
Bart, you've haunted this blog for years. Years. Aside from my sense that you aren't terribly familiar with 'facts' which don't support your skewed worldview, I would ask you: Based on your experience at Balkinization, do you have any reason to believe this to be true? In other news, as we all know, only marxists would see an urgent need for fiscal stimulus.
mattski said...
In other news, as we all know, only marxists would see an urgent need for fiscal stimulus. Progressives and socialists (a group which includes Marx and his followers). There is almost no one on the modern left which does not share a nearly complete faith in the ability of the government to repeal the business cycle.
From a letter dated May 5, 2011 by Mary J. Miller, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Financial Markets:
Post a Comment
There are serious problems with selling the assets of the United States in order to raise short-term cash: A “fire sale” of the Nation’s gold to meet payment obligations would undercut confidence in the United States both here and abroad, and would be extremely destabilizing to the world financial system. Treasury Secretaries from both parties have made it clear that they would not sell gold in order to buy time in a debt limit impasse. As then-Treasury Secretary James A. Baker said: “President [Reagan] and I are not prepared to take that step because it would undercut confidence here and abroad based on the widespread belief that the gold reserve is the foundation of our financial system, and because the Congress clearly has the power to prevent a default by assuming its responsibility with respect to the debt limit.” When President Reagan was asked whether he would consider selling gold, he told his Budget Director, James Miller, “absolutely not.” Similarly, Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin said, “We will not sell the nation's gold supply.” http://www.treasury.gov/connect/blog/Pages/Federal-Asset-Sales-Cannot-Avoid-Need-for-Increase-in-Debt-Limit.aspx She is wrong. Ms Miller is in charge of the actual selling of bonds, notes and bills that are involved with rolling over our 13 trillion dollar debt. She is an experienced and savey trader who should be able to pawn our gold, no, I mean execute some gold backed repos with less than half a dozen phone calls, and put on a short derivative play to profit from the crash when the trade becomes public. This should get the attention the President needs from the House Republicans.
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |