E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
This is common because the powerful--say, in banking, oil, tobacco, insurance, military, media, cable, and telecom--have well-trained lawyers and lobbyists who monitor the details of laws, and who can't easily be fooled by public relations. But few of us are expert enough, or even have the time, to review the details of the many laws affecting our lives. Fewer of us have lawyers on payroll protecting our interest in Congress and federal agencies. So powerful lobbyists can strategically hide their giveaways in obscure legislative details using "magic words" called terms of art that have specialized legal meaning understood by only few experts but not understood by the public (or even most Congressmen). And then politicians can sell a law to the public as a great victory while glossing over the details.
Today, the Federal Communications Commission is in meetings with large corporations to discuss rules for an open Internet. While all of us rely on an open, free Internet in our daily lives, to communicate with loved ones, to learn the news, to debate politics, to organize for or against a cause, and even just to book travel, buy books, and check our finances, few of us understand the legal rules ensuring (or not ensuring) the Internet’s openness.
As a result, since I am a scholar on this issue who spent years in DC advocating for net neutrality, I post a detailed guide to the details debated in the current net neutrality discussion. With this guide, you will not need a well-heeled lobbyist to let you know if the FCC Chairman’s public relations potential campaign is true. You will know for yourself if the Chairman has preserved an open Internet or buckled to political pressure from the largest corporations when he, like any politician, claims his policies will help the average American. Posted
12:30 PM
by Marvin Ammori [link]