Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts First time tragedy, second time farce
|
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
First time tragedy, second time farce
Sandy Levinson
By many historical accounts, FDR was deeply worried at the beginning of 1935 by the possibility of a challenge from Huey Long, the extraordinary Democratic senator from Louisiana (who was simultaneously serving as governor of that state) who was a leading critic of the New Deal from the left. Long, of course, was a remarkable orator who was speaking to many genuine realities of life, including corporate oppression, in Louisiana and elsewhere. He was also a fascistic, dictatorial demagogue (think, perhaps, of Mussolini). For better or worse, FDR could relax in 1936 not because the New Deal had suddenly started working so much better (indeed, the Supreme Court was busy invalidating much of it) , but, rather, because Long had been assassinated in Baton Rouge. Long is an endlessly fascinating figure who inspired a fine (albeit, like Long himself, over the top) novel by Robert Penn Warren that has been filmed at least twice, as well as recurrent biographies that make the reader at once realize Long's genuine appeal and his menace. He might well rise to the level of a tragic figure, and not only because of the way he died.
Comments:
Isn't your title a bit misleading considering Long was attacking FDR from the left and Palin is attacking Obama (who's about as transformative as a Prius running into a tree) from the right?
A much better title would be "First time tragedy, second time TBA"
But, of course, there is not one ounce of grandeur in Ms. Palin. Unlike Long, who had a real vision of where he wanted to take Louisiana and in fact transformed the state, for good and for ill, her visions come out of comic books. Nor, obviously, is she willing to do any hard work, by, for example, even filling out her term of office as Alaska's Governor. Did she leave any enduring impact on her own state? Yet Barack Obama, the most potentially-transformative President since FDR, must be fearful of her candidacy...
I am not often rendered speechless, but that passage sure did the trick. Palin accomplished more in her first term as Wasilla mayor than Obama did in his entire political career before arriving at the White House. Palin ran multiple members of her own political party out of office on corruption charges. Obama was simply another corrupt Chicago pol with a gift for gab. Palin took on the oil companies, raised their extraction taxes and returned the money to her constituents. Obama has dithered for a year over whether executive bonuses are good or bad. Palin shoots and skins elk. Obama shoots hoops. Palin's nickname is Sarahcuda. Obama doesn't have enough personality or accomplishment to have a nickname. It has been said that Obama was a blank slate upon which his supporters drew the person they wanted. However, you are taking that particular projection way, way, way too far by comparing Obama to FDR. I disagreed with almost everything FDR did apart from WWII. However, FDR proposed his own legislation, pushed it through and convinced the nation to love it - in short, he was an outstanding leader. In stark contrast, Obama has offered nothing but platitudes and speeches, has handed off policy making to Congress and then crumpled like wrapping paper when things got a little tough. Transformative my ass. Obama has yet to measure up to Jimmy Carter - a perennial occupant of the worst five Presidents in American history club. Obama needs to fear a Palin candidacy because she is more qualified and far tougher. Given Palin's relatively slim resume, that fact is pathetic.
Palin took on the oil companies, raised their extraction taxes and returned the money to her constituents.
Doesn't that make her a communist? Obama needs to fear a Palin candidacy because she is more qualified and far tougher No one, outside the GOP power brokers, fears a Palin candidacy. She is clearly an imbecile, and her poll numbers indicate that a lot of people are very much aware of that fact.
Here's our intrepid former backpacker:
"I am not often rendered speechless, but that passage sure did the trick." Alas, the trick was soon over, followed by 35 lines. Pointless, yes. Speechless, no. Perhaps this speechlessness will appear in our yodeler's work of friction [sick!] in progress on Obama's two terms.
Our intrepid former backpacker's ears must be ringing with George Will's OpEd in today's (2/18/10) WaPo titled "Sarah Palin and the mutual loathing society" that closes with this:
"Political nature abhors a vacuum, which is what often exists for a year or two in a party after it loses a presidential election. But today's saturation journalism, mesmerized by presidential politics and ravenous for material, requires a steady stream of political novelties. In that role, Palin is united with the media in a relationship of mutual loathing. This is not her fault. But neither is it her validation." Perhaps this will fill the vacuum between our yodeler's ears.
I tend to agree: Portraying Obama as FDR is more than a little over the top. FDR, for all that I loath his policies, was a fairly competent President. Obama is something of an empty suit, must have been a real shock to his system to discover that Presidents couldn't vote "present".
I grew up in New Orleans and Huey Long was still a divisive figure in the 70s and 80s. The elites still despise him. I remember listening to a professor of law school denounce Long in class. His reforms were necessary as were perhaps the means he chose to effectuate those reforms. Perhaps the better comparison might be to one of the populist leaders in Latin America on the left (Hugo Chavez comes to mind). The best biography is T.H. Williams, Huey Long. He starts the book by saying that Louisiana is the northernmost tier of the banana republics. The question of the day is whether given the deep divide between elites in the US and their inability to compromise on such basic matters as a budget deficit that we might be witnessing the Latin Americanization of American politics. Some of the features of the "new" politics of the Americas are that personalities matter more than programs and that excessive power will be ceded to presidents in the vain hope that they can solve intractable problems.
Judge Richard Posner has an interesting book review (titled: "1937, 2010") in The New Republic (2/18/10) available at:
http://www.tnr.com/article/books-and-arts/1937-2010 on Jeff Shesol's "Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court" with some interesting comparisons between FDR in 1937 and Obama in 2010. Brett has given up on subtlety apparently with this: "Obama is something of an empty suit," Compare this to the intellectual nudity of George W. Bush for 8 years.
I tend to agree: Portraying Obama as FDR is more than a little over the top. FDR, for all that I loath his policies, was a fairly competent President. Obama is something of an empty suit
# posted by Brett : 6:34 AM Brett, after 8 years of Dumbya it's easy to understand why some would compare his successor to FDR.
Shag from Brookline said...
"Obama is something of an empty suit," Compare this to the intellectual nudity of George W. Bush for 8 years. After this past year, I cannot believe you still want to go there. What ever you think of him, Bush was always in charge. Bush got his way when the GOP held Congress and still got his way when the Dems took Congress. In contrast, Obama does not even have a plan or a clue. Obama believes that the presidency consists of a series of speeches and parties - both of which he holds a first year record for. The signature substantive accomplishment of his time in office has been an $835 billion pork bill that he had Congress write as it wished. That is it, unless you count helping destroy his party's standing with voters in record time. Even you on the left are somewhere between disappointed and pissed off with Obama's dithering weak sister routine. Thus, it is unsurprising that merchandise with Dubya's fratboy grin and "Do you miss me yet" is selling like hotcakes.
After this past year, I cannot believe you still want to go there.
You must be fucking kidding. You assholes created an epic disaster. We're going to be reminding everyone of George W Bush for the next 50 years.
Our yodeler continues in his search for that pony in the pile of political excrement left behind after 8 years of Bush/Cheney.
Some of the features of the "new" politics of the Americas are that personalities matter more than programs and that excessive power will be ceded to presidents in the vain hope that they can solve intractable problems.
It sounds to me as though the very fundamentals of self-government, either republican or direct, should be examined. Ceding power to an office holder mostly by default seems to be yearning for monarchical structure. Sure we can vote the individual out of office in due time or try to frame an appropriate impeachment based on undesirable policies but these do not help the country during need or even crisis. It seems to me that the means of discussion and influence held by citizens at large is insubstantial. Could we create a better way?
Folks:
The expiration date on "Blame Bush" was last summer when the Obama and Dem polls started their historical free fall. If you wish to campaign against Bush in 2010 and 2012, please be my guest. Voters know who is in charge. Interestingly and tellingly, no one is attempting to defend Obama against my rather brutal assessments.
The expiration date on "Blame Bush" was last summer
# posted by Bart DePalma : 10:59 AM Wishful thinking on your part. There is no expiration date for reminding people of the disaster you clowns created. As for your other claims, one only has to consider the source. You are self-refuting
There is no statute of limitations for political idiocy so that our intrepid former backpacker and the Bush/Cheney Administration will continue as fair game, although both are getting gamy.
"Yet Barack Obama, the most potentially-transformative President since FDR"
I don't know what Barak Obama you're talking about. Did you sleep through 2009?
Seriously, Baghdad, Bush/Cheney was an epic disaster. Do you really think we're not going to shove that down your throat for the next few dozen years?
if we are to believe that the expiration on the "blame bush" show was some time last year, the first year of the obama administration, i would like to know when our friends on the right believe the "blame clinton" nonsense expired.
phg said...if we are to believe that the expiration on the "blame bush" show was some time last year, the first year of the obama administration, i would like to know when our friends on the right believe the "blame clinton" nonsense expired.
About the same time in the first Bush Administration. The GOP did not run on "Blame Clinton" in 2002 or 2004.
The GOP did not run on "Blame Clinton" in 2002 or 2004.
# posted by Bart DePalma : 1:56 PM Clowns like you are still running with it. Hell, you're still running on the blame Carter platform.
Just to be clear Bart,
I don't feel any need to refute anything that comes out of your delusional neo-fascist mouth. I've done it too many times already. There isn't any reasonable person reading this blog who doesn't understand exactly what a malicious subversive and congenital liar you are -- a total waste of time, carbon, and oxygen.
The Dem polling firm PPP is coming out with an interesting poll tomorrow. 59% percent of Americans (not registered or likely voters) think that Palin is unqualified to be President, but 22% of those would still vote for her over Obama.
PPP observed: "I guess Republicans could make the argument that Obama's just so bad that any Republican would be better than him, whether they consider that Republican to be qualified or not." Well yeah, that seems to be what the numbers indicate.
PPP observed: "I guess Republicans could make the argument that Obama's just so bad that any Republican would be better than him, whether they consider that Republican to be qualified or not."
# posted by Bart DePalma : 5:22 PM These poll numbers are GREAT NEWS for John McCain!!
There isn't any reasonable person reading this blog who doesn't understand exactly what a malicious subversive and congenital liar you are -- a total waste of time, carbon, and oxygen.
I consider myself a reasonable person of the legal persuasion. I cannot speak for other reasonable people, but for the beenfit of future empirical study I think that description is right on target based on my year or so of reading Prof. Balkin's fine blog and its various contributors.
it still boggles the mind that any serious observer of US politics would try to atribute any power to the figure head that presidency has become in this country... real power is not top down in this country... that is why grass-roots types who have a track record of bristling against falling in with the party line and; for better or worse; insist on following her own tack, represent a real hope for change to those who do feel that it is the only way to get it. Especialy since the "Great Hope" has so far fallen into the party (and one could argue that both parties are essentialy the same ideologicaly) line and, instead of continued with all the policies that the voters that put him there thought he would change (which some would argue he couldn't in the first place).
I'm not defending her or agreeing with all her views or attacking Obama just offering a perspective on why she has the popularity she does.
Sec. Sebelius told the press yesterday that President Obama would support a public option if the Senate does first.
Transformative presidency indeed!
It doesn't matter what metaphorical bullshit you're trying to sell, he, or she, does not get a vote.
it still boggles the mind that any serious observer of US politics would try to atribute any power to the figure head that presidency has become in this country... real power is not top down in this country... that is why grass-roots types who have a track record of bristling against falling in with the party line and; for better or worse; insist on following her own tack, represent a real hope for change...
I don't mean to pick on 'Jay's stuff' here. I just want to point out an instance of confused pro-Palin thinking because a) it's right here in front of me and b) it supports my belief that one would have to be confused to support Sarah Palin as potential candidate for the presidency. So: if the presidency is a powerless office then why look to a presidential candidate? Nothing in the aforementioned comment "explains" Palin's popularity, since a potential presidential candidate doesn't gather support amongst people who are blessed with the insight that the office of the presidency is essentially powerless. Otoh, people who are fundamentally confused about how the political process in this country works and who the two major parties really work for do in fact seem to flock to Palin. Palin shoots and skins elk. Obama shoots hoops. Palin's nickname is Sarahcuda. Obama doesn't have enough personality or accomplishment to have a nickname. Q.E.D. *Add to that, mentally incompetent zealots like Bart DePalma, who make egregiously ludicrous claims of upholding the law of the land (the US Constitution) while simultaneously arguing that the president is above the law and can order any damn thing done he wishes as long as it can be construed as an act of warfare, are exactly the sort of fools who would carry the Palin banner and wreck the debate at blogs like this. **Although if the software of Balkinization was changed to allow mentally incompetent zealots to be banned things would change around here.
As to what mattski said... one importance here is that the President sets forth an overall mind-set and in various ways (putting aside appointments and such) furthers a certain ethos that has many ripples like a stone in a pond. So, it's not like s/he is a potted plant, even if not as powerful as some give them credit for.
In fact, the assumed unimportance furthers the support: if the President is in effect powerless, why not just elect someone who we like, who we like to have a beer with or whatever, as a symbolic gesture?
Post a Comment
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |