Balkinization |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahman sabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Our Overseas Empire
|
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Our Overseas Empire
Guest Blogger Alan Tauber In 1898, with the signing of the Treaty of Paris and the end of the Spanish-American War, the United States became a colonial power. Over a century later, the overseas empire remains and has in fact grown substantially. Relying on Art. IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, Congress has set up a patchwork quilt of jurisdiction and control over the five US territories of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. These five territories have three different statuses under U.S. law and two different statuses internationally. The U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam and American Samoa remain on the United Nations’ list of “Non-Self-Governing Territories,” while Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands have commonwealth status, and are thus deemed to be self-governing, despite their continued standing as not destined for eventual statehood. This post aims to explain the varying positions of these territories within U.S. law and examine how we got to where we are. Under U.S. law, territories can take one of several forms. First, a territory can be incorporated or unincorporated. Incorporation, within the territorial context, has been defined by the Supreme Court as destined for eventual statehood. As of now, all five U.S. territories are defined as unincorporated. Ever since the Court decided the “Insular Cases,” a series of cases from the turn of the 20th Century, this has meant that these territories are not full members of the Republic. In fact, the Supreme Court once famously described Puerto Rico as “foreign, in a domestic sense.” This distinction between incorporated and unincorporated territory has been used by the Court to deny equal rights to territorial citizens. For example, while fundamental constitutional rights, such as the First Amendment, apply fully to these territories, other, procedural rights, such as the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a trial by jury, do not. These rights apply only at the sufferance of Congress. Currently, Congress has extended the Constitution to all territories, although the 14th Amendment has limited application in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa (more on this below). The second distinction recognized by U.S. law is between organized and unorganized territories. An organized territory is one in which Congress has passed an organic act, setting up a system of government. Currently, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam are organized territories, with systems of government set up by federal statute. American Samoa remains an unorganized territory, operating under an indigenous system of government not directly regulated by Congress. Finally, Puerto Rico and the Northern Marianas are commonwealths, which indicates a higher level of political organization. However, any changes to the governing documents of these islands must be approved by Congress and the President. The exception is the Northern Marianas. Under the Covenant, it has the right to change its constitution without Congressional or Presidential approaval. Using this rubric, the territories can be classified thusly: Puerto Rico and the Northern Marianas are unincorporated commonwealths, Guam and the Virgin Islands are unincorporated organized territories and American Samoa is an unincorporated unorganized territory. All five territories pay federal taxes. However, Congress has directed that any monies collected be returned to the islands for their own local use. This has led many to the mistaken impression that islanders are not required to pay federal taxes. With the exception of Puerto Rico, all U.S. territories work with the Office of Insular Affairs in the Department of the Interior. This branch office works with the territories and is the primary contact point with the Executive Branch. This office also works with the three freely associated states of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of Palau. These states differ from territories in that they are independent nations, but have signed a Compact of Free Association with the United States. Under these agreements, these nations remain independent, but rely on the United States to handle defense, funding grants and social services to the citizens of these island nations. All three were formerly in the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands set up by the United Nations and administered by the United States. Puerto Rico Puerto Rico is the oldest of the territories, having come under U.S. power as part of the settlement with Spain at the end of the Spanish-American war. Citizenship was extended to the island via the Jones Act in 1917, when the government of the island was completely reorganized. Puerto Rico ratified its constitution in 1952, and Congress and the President approved it. Puerto Rico has held several referenda as to its political status in relation to the United States, and much of the island’s political life revolves around this question. Parties can be classified by their varying support for statehood, independence or commonwealth status. The latest referendum took place in 1996. Puerto Ricans were faced with three choices – independence, statehood or an “enhanced commonwealth status” which was never clearly defined. The largest share of votes (over 48%) went to “None of the Above” indicating that a large plurality of Puerto Ricans are happy with their current status. Independence received the lowest share of the votes. The current status allows Puerto Ricans to serve in the armed forces, but they cannot vote for their Commander-in-Chief. Puerto Rico has a non-voting delegate who serves in the House of Representatives. He is elected to a four year term, has speaking privileges and can introduce legislation. However, under the current system, while he may vote in committee, he may only vote on the House floor when his vote is not definitive. Under the previous administration, he had no voting privileges at all on the House floor. Decisions by the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico were appealable to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. However, since 1961, direct appeal has been had to the Supreme Court. The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) were originally part of the Pacific Trust Territory created by the UN and administered by the United States at the end of World War II. In 1976, the Trust Territory was ended and the various components were allowed to vote on their status. The CNMI entered into negotiations with the United States to achieve a commonwealth status similar to Puerto Rico’s. The Covenant that was eventually negotiated was passed by Congress and remains in effect today. Under the Covenant, the CNMI enjoys a great deal of home rule. The majority of the protections of the Constitution apply to the Commonwealth, though for the first 25 years, land ownership was restricted solely to natives of the Islands, despite the 14th Amendment’s requirement of equal protection. Unlike Puerto Rico, the CNMI does not have a delegate in Congress. Rather, they have a “Resident Representative” who lobbies on behalf of the Islands, but does not have office space on Capitol Hill and does not serve on Congressional committees. Rather, he plays a role akin to a lobbyist. Citizens of the islands are citizens of the United States. He is elected by the people every four years and presents his credentials to the Secretary of State, much like an ambassador, although he retains none of the rights or privileges of such an office. This makes the citizens of the CNMI the only American citizens without a voice in Congress. Decisions by the Supreme Court of the Northern Mariana Islands were appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Since May 1, 2004, parties have had the right to appeal directly to the Supreme Court. The U.S. Virgin Islands The U.S. Virgin Islands were purchased from Denmark in 1917. Citizenship was granted to residents of the Virgin Islands in 1927. In the last eighty years, the organic statute has been overhauled twice, most recently in 1954. As of 2008, the Virgin Islands was making its fifth attempt to write its own constitution. The four previous attempts (in 1964, 1971, 1977 and 1980) failed to achieve the necessary votes for ratification. On May 29, 2009, the President of the Constitutional Convention submitted an approved draft to the Governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands. Like Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands have an elected, non-voting Congressional delegate. The delegate is elected every two years. They took part in the Democratic Primaries during the 2008 elections, but like other territories are not eligible to vote for President. In January, 2007, the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands became the highest court, assuming jurisdiction from the Superior Court. For its first 15 years, appeals are to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Beginning in 2022 (or sooner if Congress so directs), appeals will be directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. Guam Guam is another former member of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. It was administered by the U.S. Navy until 1950, when President Truman signed the Organic Act, providing for civilian government for the first time in Guam’s history. A locally drafted Constitution was rejected by the populace in 1979. Since that time, no further effort has been made to write a Constitution for Guam. The island has elected to deal with its political status prior to drafting a constitution. Like Puerto Rico, Guam has hosted a series of referenda on its political status. In the most recent referendum, statehood was rejected in favor of commonwealth status by 3-1. Despite these calls for commonwealth status, along with a UN mandate to establish a permanent status for the island, Guam remains an unincorporated, organized territory. Citizens of Guam are citizens of the United States. Guam has a non-voting delegate in Congress. Like the Virgin Islands, this delegate is elected every two years, serves on Congressional committees and may cast non-deciding votes on the floor of the House of Representatives. Decisions from the Supreme Court of Guam are heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. American Samoa American Samoa is the only unincorporated, unorganized territory of the United States. Congress has never passed an organic act for the islands and they are still governed using the indigenous matai system in a local legislature known as the Fono. American Samoa received the right to elect its own governor in 1980. Prior to that time, the Governor was appointed by the President. Unlike the other territories, citizens of American Samoa are merely American nationals, eligible for citizenship, but not granted such citizenship as a matter of right. Interestingly, unlike either Guam or the Virgin Islands, American Samoa has adopted its own Constitution and has been governed by it since 1967. American Samoa has its own Congressional delegate in the House of Representatives. Because of its lack of organization, American Samoa is something of a legal black hole. Judges on the High Court of American Samoa are appointed and removed by the Secretary of the Interior. American Samoa is not part of the Ninth Circuit, or any judicial circuit, like the other Pacific Territories. Appeals from the Court are to the Secretary of the Interior alone. Federal criminal cases are heard by the District Court for the District of Hawaii. Currently, the High Court is the only Article II Court in existence. In July, 2009, the American Samoan delegate introduced legislation in the House that would create a federal court for American Samoa, removing jurisdiction from the District Court in Hawaii. Conclusion Overall, the situation in the territories remains much as it has for the last century. While some steps have been made, such as the fact that all five territories elect their governors, much work still remains to be done to bring the territories into equality with each other, let alone the states. Education remains the key issue for representatives of the territories. Until members of Congress and the public at large are better educated about the existence of, and challenges facing the territories, real problems will remain. It is my hope that this post will help start this process of education. Alan Tauber is a Ph.D candidate in political science at the University of South Carolina. Posted 2:00 PM by Guest Blogger [link]
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers ![]() Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) ![]() David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) ![]() Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). ![]() Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) ![]() Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) ![]() Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) ![]() Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) ![]() Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) ![]() Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution ![]() Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) ![]() Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) ![]() Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) ![]() Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) ![]() Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic ![]() Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) ![]() David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) ![]() Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |