E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Apparently some Republican leaders in the Senate are thinking about doing what they can to delay Judge Sotomayor's nomination hearings until September, asserting that they need the time between now and then (rather than between now and July) to study all the opinions she rendered as a district judge and as a judge of the court of appeals. (Whether the latter group includes all the cases in which she sat on a panel is unclear to me from the reports I saw.) I've also seen reports that Senator Cornyn has said that Republicans don't have the votes to mount a filibuster.
If Senator Cornyn's right, I wonder whether efforts to delay the hearings -- if there are such efforts -- demonstrate appropriate respect for the Supreme Court.
The assumption seems to be that Judge Sotomayor will be confirmed (absent the disclosure of some personal scandal -- and perhaps delay is "justified" on the ground that the longer you take, the greater the chance that something will turn up, in Dickens's phrase). If that's so, though, it would seem to make sense from the point of view of running a government to get her at her post sooner rather than later, especially if, as most people assume, the votes she casts aren't going to be dramatically different from those Justice Souter has cast. Delay puts a burden on the Court (for a short time, admittedly), and what it gains seems to me quite unclear, aside from some possible partisan advantages (and even that possibility seems to me not that large).