Balkinization |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahman sabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts The Rotation of the Justices: A Thought Experiment
|
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
The Rotation of the Justices: A Thought Experiment
JB Do you want to know how Robert Bork became Chief Justice? Why the Court never heard Bush v. Gore? Read on. I've written previously in support of a proposal that would ensure regular appointments of Supreme Court Justices. The President and Congress would nominate and confirm one Supreme Court Justice very two years, and the quorum for deciding cases would consist of the nine Justices most Junior in service. The more senior Justices will retain their commissions and life tenure. But they will hear cases with the full Court only when one of the junior Justices is recused or otherwise unable to perform his or her duties. Senior Justices can still consider petitions for certiorari (discretionary appeals), serve on other federal appellate courts, and handle matters that regularly come before individual Justices. But their caseload will be concentrated in their first eighteen years of service. How would this proposal work in practice? In order to find out, I began with the actual pattern of appointments from 1951 to the present and ran it through the proposal, appointing a new Justice very two years. I chose 1951 as the starting point because everyone on the Court at that point had been appointed by one party (the Democrats) so we could see how successive appointments by presidents of both parties changed the composition of the Court. I extended the hypothetical to 2015 and imagined for purposes of the hypothetical that the Democrats retain the White House for two terms. In each case I assumed that Justices would retire or die whey they actually did, thus creating a vacancy that would bring a Senior Justice into the quorum temporarily. This helps to demonstrate how the proposal works in practice. If we were actually to adopt this proposal, the retirement decisions of the Justices might have been very different. Most Justices would never retire, because the workload of a Senior Justice is not very onerous, and they still retain their full salaries. In addition, if the proposal had been in place from 1951 onwards, presidents might have made very different choices of whom to pick (I note a few of these below). Nevertheless, this hypothetical helps us to understand how regular appointments would make (or not make) a difference to the composition of the Court. As you will see, the biggest differences come in the later years, when Justices tended to live longer and stay on the Court longer. Some highlights: * Hugo Black, although a senior Justice after 1953, remains in the quorum for deciding cases until his death in 1971 because so many other Justices die or retire. * Similarly, William O.Douglas, although a Senior Justice for long periods of time, stays in the quorum until 1975, when he retires following a stroke. Because Douglas retires when there are no remaining Senior Justices, the Republicans get an extra appointment in 1975 according to the statutory proposal, robbing Jimmy Carter of the appointment he would have gotten in 1977. * Jimmy Carter does, however, get one appointment, who replaces William Brennan in the active quorum in 1979. As a result, Shirley Mount Hufstedler of the Ninth Circuit, and not Sandra Day O'Connor, becomes the nation's first female Justice. Because it has already been done, Ronald Reagan does not make a campaign promise to nominate the first woman Justice, and so his 1981 choice of Sandra Day O'Connor becomes somewhat less likely. * Thurgood Marshall remains in the quorum for deciding cases until 1983. He makes a brief pinch hitting appearance in 1986, replacing Lewis Powell, until he is pushed aside in 1989 by George H.W. Bush's first appointment (who we assume is David Souter, but might in fact have been very different under these circumstances). After Marshall's stint, the Justices now regularly live so long (or are appointed so young) that Senior Justices are not needed except in cases of recusal. * In real life Ronald Reagan got only three appointments, in 1981, 1986, and 1987 (O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy) plus he elevated Rehnquist to the Chief Justiceship. Under the proposal, he would have four Supreme Court appointments, in 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1986 (one year early because of Burger's retirement). If we imagine that Scalia would have been nominated in 1983, there would have been plenty of room for Robert Bork in 1985, while Lewis Powell was still on the Court. Reagan might still have designated Rehnquist to be the Chief Justice in 1986 when Burger retired; however it is possible that he might also have picked Bork or Scalia. The Bork Court: It has a nice ring to it, doesn't it? * The four Reagan appointees (instead of three) along with William Rehnquist, Byron White and Clarence Thomas would have greatly increased the chances that Roe v. Wade was overturned by the early 1990s. That is because only two of the four Reagan appointees (say, Scalia and Bork) would have had to support overturning Roe. And if O'Connor is not appointed as the first female Justice (see above) Reagan might have picked a more determinedly pro-life Justice, increasing the margin for overturning Roe to 6-3. This should make the Republicans happy. * Jimmy Carter would have gotten one appointment and Bill Clinton four. William Rehnquist leaves the quorum for deciding cases (except of course, for the occasional recusal) in 1993, Antonin Scalia leaves the quorum in 2001, and Clarence Thomas leaves the quorum in 2009. This should make the Democrats happy. * Because Rehnquist becomes a senior Justice in 1993, Bill Clinton gets to appoint a new Chief Justice. It is none other than Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who becomes the nation's first female Chief Justice. Because she stays in the quorum until 2011, John Roberts does not become Chief Justice. * In December 2000, the Court consists of Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan's fourth appointment, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton's third appointment, and Clinton's fourth appointment. Assuming that Souter votes the same way he did in real life, Bush v. Gore comes out the other way or the Court doesn't even take the case. The full results of the thought experiment are below: Rotation of Justices, 1951-2015 1951: The Supreme Court consists of Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Jackson, Burton, Vinson, Minton, Clark. We begin with these Justices, all appointed by Democrats. There are no Senior Justices held in reserve. Eisenhower's first appointment comes in 1953. It is Earl Warren. 1953: Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Jackson (replaced by Harlan in 1954), Burton, Vinson (replaced by Black in 1953), Minton, Clark, Warren. Senior Justices in reserve: Black. Vinson dies in September 1953, Black fills in as a Senior Justice. Warren (who has just been appointed) becomes Chief Justice. Jackson dies in 1954, There are no remaining Senior Justices, so Harlan is appointed a year early. He would have been the new appointment in 1955. 1955: Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Burton, Minton (replaced by Brennan in 1956), Clark, Warren, Harlan. Senior Justices in reserve: none. Minton retires in 1956. Because there is no other Senior Justice, Brennan is appointed a year early. He would have been appointed in 1957 otherwise. 1957: Black, Reed (replaced by Whittaker in 1957), Frankfurter, Douglas, Burton (replaced by Stewart in 1958), Clark, Warren, Harlan, Brennan Senior Justices in reserve: none. Reed retires in 1957. There are no other Senior Justices, so Whittaker is appointed early. Burton retires in 1958; because there are no other Senior Justices, Stewart is appointed one year early. (This gives Eisenhower five appointments). 1959: Black, Frankfurter, Douglas, Clark, Warren, Harlan, Brennan, Whittaker, Stewart. Senior Justices in reserve: none. 1961: Frankfurter (replaced by Black after 1962), Douglas, Clark, Warren, Harlan, Brennan, Whittaker (replaced by Goldberg after 1962), Stewart, White. Senior Justices in reserve: Black. Frankfurter dies in 1962, so Black replaces him. Whittaker retires in 1962. There are no remaining Senior Justices, so Goldberg is appointed a year early. 1963: Black, Douglas, Clark, Warren, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Goldberg. Senior Justices in reserve: none. Goldberg retires in 1964. There is no remaining Senior Justice, so Fortas is appointed a year early. 1965: Black, Douglas, Clark, Warren, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas. Senior Justices in reserve: none. 1967: Black, Douglas, Warren, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas, Marshall Senior Justices in reserve: none. Clark retires in 1967 just as Marshall is appointed. 1969: Douglas, Warren (quickly replaced by Blackmun), Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas (quickly replaced by Black), Marshall, Burger. Senior Justices in reserve: Black. Fortas resigns in 1969. Black fills in as Senior Justice. Warren retires in 1969. Burger becomes Chief Justice. Because there are no remaining Senior Justices, Blackmun is appointed two years early. 1971: Black, Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Burger, Blackmun. Senior Justices in reserve: none. Black and Harlan die in 1971. Because there are no Senior Justices to fill their slots, Powell and Rhenquist are appointed early (for 1973 and 1975). 1973: Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist. Senior Justices in reserve: none. 1975: Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist. Senior Justices in reserve: none. Douglas retires in 1975. There is no remaining Senior Justice to fill the vacancy, so Stevens is appointed two years early, robbing Jimmy Carter of an appointment. 1977: Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens. Senior Justices in reserve: none. Note that because Stevens was appointed early, President Carter does not get a pick in 1977. 1979: Stewart, White, Marshall, Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1. [This refers to Carter's first pick] Senior Justices in reserve: Brennan. 1981: White, Marshall, Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor. Senior Justices in reserve: Brennan, Stewart. Stewart resigns in 1981. 1983: Marshall, Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia. Senior Justices in reserve: Brennan, White, 1985: Burger (replaced by Marshall after 1986), Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy. Senior Justices in reserve: Brennan, White, Marshall. Burger retires in 1986; Rehnquist becomes Chief Justice. 1987: Blackmun, Powell (replaced by Marshall), Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4. [This refers to Reagan's fourth appointment] Senior Justices in reserve: Brennan, White, Marshall. Powell retires in 1987, and Marshall fills in until 1989. 1989: Blackmun, Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter. Senior Justices in reserve: Brennan, White, Marshall. Brennan retires in 1990. 1991: Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter, Thomas. Senior Justices in reserve: White, Blackmun, Marshall dies in 1991. 1993: Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg. Senior Justices in reserve: White, Blackmun, Rehnquist. White retires in 1993; Blackmun retires in 1994. Note that because Rehnquist is not part of the regular quorum, someone else (possibly Ginsburg, because Clinton is now President) becomes Chief Justice. 1995: Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer. Senior Justices in reserve: Rehnquist, Stevens. 1997: O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton 3. Senior Justices in reserve: Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1. 1999: Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton 3, Clinton 4. Senior Justices in reserve: Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor. 2001: Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter and Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton 3, Clinton 4, Roberts. Senior Justices in reserve: Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia. Note that Roberts does not become Chief Justice because Ginsburg is still on the Court. 2003: Reagan 4, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton 3, Clinton 4, Roberts, Alito. Senior Justices in reserve: Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy. 2005: Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton 3, Clinton 4, Roberts, Alito, G.W. Bush 3. Senior Justices in reserve: Rehnquist, Stevens, Carter 1, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4. Rehnquist dies in 2005; O'Connor retires in 2006. 2007: Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton 3, Clinton 4, Roberts, Alito, G.W. Bush 3, G.W. Bush 4. Senior Justices in reserve: Stevens, Carter 1, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter. 2009: Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton 3, Clinton 4, Roberts, Alito, G.W. Bush 3, G.W. Bush 4, Obama 1. Senior Justices in reserve: Stevens, Carter 1, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Souter, Thomas. Souter retires in 2009. 2011: Breyer, Clinton 3, Clinton 4, Roberts, Alito, G.W. Bush 3, G.W. Bush 4, Obama 1, Obama 2. Senior Justices in reserve: Stevens, Carter 1, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Thomas, Ginsburg. Ginsburg is no longer in the quorum, so someone else, possibly Obama's second appointment, becomes Chief Justice. 2013: Clinton 3, Clinton 4, Roberts, Alito, G.W. Bush 3, G.W. Bush 4, Obama 1, Obama 2, Obama 3. Senior Justices in reserve: Stevens, Carter 1, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer. 2015: Clinton 4, Roberts, Alito, G.W. Bush 3, G.W. Bush 4, Obama 1, Obama 2, Obama 3, Obama 4. Senior Justices in reserve: Stevens, Carter 1, Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan 4, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton 3. Posted 10:15 AM by JB [link]
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers ![]() Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) ![]() David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) ![]() Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). ![]() Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). ![]() Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) ![]() Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) ![]() Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) ![]() Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) ![]() Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) ![]() Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) ![]() Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) ![]() Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution ![]() Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) ![]() Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) ![]() Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) ![]() Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) ![]() James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) ![]() Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) ![]() Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) ![]() Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) ![]() Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) ![]() Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) ![]() Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic ![]() Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) ![]() Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) ![]() Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) ![]() Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) ![]() David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) ![]() Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) ![]() Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) ![]() Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |