E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Jeff Tulis on presidential constructions of emergency
JB
In response to my previous post comparing how Bush and Obama have both used of (and constructed) emergency as a political strategy, Jeff Tulis (of the University of Texas Government Department) writes:
1. On additional parallels -- both Bush and Obama define the serious crisis as an extrapolation to the future from a less serious current circumstance in the present. Thus, Bush extrapolated from 9/11 a more serious global threat if too little were done quickly and Obama extrapolates a much more serious economic crisis in the future if too little is done quickly. This is interesting because the serious crises in both cases are anticipated, not yet actual, and the actions of each President make it difficult to refute their claims (since the actions affect the future making it difficult to assess the counterfactual regarding what it would have looked like had they not acted).
2. On additional differences -- Obama has not only been more transparent, he has also been more respectful of the legislative role. He has not threatened to institute emergency regulations whether or not Congress authorizes them. He has not claimed he did not need legislative authorization. Indeed, he sought and received not just "authorization" but actual legislation. Had Bush's actions been parallel to this, he would have sought, say, a declaration of war. Or he would, like Truman in the steel seizure, have taken action but indicated at the same time that the Congress was invited to disagree and he would follow Congress's will if they rejected his policy or set a new one. To the extent that Bush did seek Congressional authorization, he presented his partisans with the bill, the wording, almost every detail. Obama, on the other hand, left considerable discretion to the legislature (and has been criticized by his own partisans for not dictating the process).